Innovative Care for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Use of Bedside Intestinal Ultrasound to Optimize Management.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has reduced access to endoscopy and imaging. Safe alternatives, available at the bedside, are needed for accurate, non-invasive strategies to evaluate disease activity. The aim of this study is to establish the impact of clinic-based bedside intestinal ultrasound (IUS) on decision making, reduction in reliance on endoscopy and short-term healthcare utilization. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic, of the impact of a regional comprehensive care pathway to manage IBD patients consecutively recruited with acute symptoms, or suspected new diagnosis of IBD. Clinic-based access to sigmoidoscopy and bedside intestinal ultrasound were evaluated, used to direct clinical care and avoid hospitalization or hospital-based endoscopy. Results: A total of 72 patients were seen between March 15 and June 30, 2020. Of these, 57% (41/72) were female, 64% had Crohn's disease (46/72) with 14% (10/72) presenting with symptoms requiring investigation, of which 5 new cases of IBD were identified (50%). Immediate access to ultrasound and sigmoidoscopy led to meaningful changes in management in 80.5% (58/72) of patients. Active inflammation was detected by IUS alone (72.5%, 29/40) or in combination with in-clinic sigmoidoscopy (78%, 18/23) or sigmoidoscopy alone (78% 7/9). Six patients were referred to colorectal surgery for urgent surgical intervention including two patients admitted directly. Conclusion: Implementation of IUS as part of a clinical care pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic is a useful strategy to enhance care delivery and improve clinical decisions, while sparing other important acute care resources.

Complementary and alternative medications in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

The use of complementary and alternative medications (CAM), products, and therapies not considered to be part of conventional medicine is common among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients often turn to these therapies as they are considered natural and safe, with significant benefit reported beyond disease control. There is emerging evidence that some of these therapies may have anti-inflammatory activity; however, robust evidence for their efficacy in modulating disease activity is currently lacking. Patients often avoid discussing the use of CAM with their physicians, which may lead to drug interactions and/or reduced adherence with conventional therapy. It is important for physicians to be aware of the commonly used CAM and current evidence behind these therapies in order to better counsel their patients about their use in the management of IBD. This narrative review provides an overview of the evidence of the more commonly used CAM in patients with IBD.

Appropriate Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologic Agents for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is widely available for biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We reviewed current data and provided expert opinion regarding the clinical utility of TDM for biologic therapies in IBD. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi method to establish consensus. A comprehensive literature review was performed regarding the use of TDM of biologic therapy in IBD and presented to international IBD specialists. Subsequently, 28 statements on the application of TDM in clinical practice were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = strongly disagree and 10 = strongly agree) by each of the panellists. Statements were accepted if 80% or more of the participants agreed with a score ≥7. The remaining statements were discussed and revised based on the available evidence followed by a second round of voting. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 24 (86%) statements. For anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, proactive TDM was found to be appropriate after induction and at least once during maintenance therapy, but this was not the case for the other biologics. Reactive TDM was appropriate for all agents both for primary non-response and secondary loss of response. The panellists also agreed on several statements regarding TDM and appropriate drug and anti-drug antibody (ADA) concentration thresholds for biologics in specific clinical scenarios. CONCLUSION: Consensus was achieved towards the utility of TDM of biologics in IBD, particularly anti-TNF therapies. More data are needed especially on non-anti-TNF biologics to further define optimal drug concentration and ADA thresholds as these can vary depending on the therapeutic outcomes assessed.

Real-world clinical, endoscopic and radiographic efficacy of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab is an α4ß7 integrin antagonist with proven efficacy for inducing and maintaining clinical response and remission in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM: To evaluate clinical and objective response and remission rates with vedolizumab in a large, real world cohort. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult CD and UC patients receiving vedolizumab between 2012 and 2017 was conducted. PRIMARY OUTCOME: clinical or objective response and remission at 3, 6 and 12 months after induction. Clinical remission was defined by complete, steroid-free absence of symptoms. Objective remission was defined by endoscopic mucosal healing or normalisation of radiographic appearance on contrast-enhanced ultrasound or CT/MR enterography. RESULTS: The study included 222 vedolizumab patients (122 CD, 100 UC). In CD, clinical remission at 3, 6 and 12 months was achieved in 19.8% (22/111), 22.1% (21/95) and 22.1% (15/68) of patients, respectively. Objective remission occurred in 11.5% (6/52), 21.2% (14/66), and 18.9% (7/37) of patients at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In UC, clinical remission at 3, 6, and 12 months was 51.0% (51/100), 61.8% (55/89) and 61.9% (39/63), respectively. Endoscopic remission occurred in 27.5% (11/40), 41.0% (16/39) and 47.8% (22/46) of patients at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with UC as compared to CD, and those with milder disease activity were more likely to achieve objectively defined remission at both 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab was effective for induction and maintenance of clinical and objective remission, both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Appropriateness of Combination Therapy for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: One Size Still Does Not Fit All.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and α4ß7 integrin are effective when given as monotherapy in inducing and/or maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), but data from RCTs are less clear on whether concomitant immunomodulator (IM) therapy confers additional benefit. In CD, RCT data are mixed,1,2 as are results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, showing no benefit overall,3 minimal benefit with individual agents,4 and comparative benefit over some monotherapies but not others.5 For example, concomitant azathioprine with infliximab is more effective than either drug alone in patients with CD naive to both drugs,2 but whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy with infliximab in nonnaive patients, or with other approved biologic drugs in any population, remains unknown. In UC, RCTs have shown that the benefit may be limited to specific populations,6 whereas systematic reviews suggest no benefit at all.7.

Preoperative Ustekinumab Treatment Is Not Associated With Increased Postoperative Complications in Crohn's Disease: A Canadian Multi-Centre Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab (UST), an anti-IL12/23 inhibitor is indicated for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). However, it is unclear if patients treated with UST are at increased risk for postoperative complications. AIM: To evaluate the postoperative safety outcomes in UST-treated CD patients. METHODS: A multicentre cohort study of UST-treated CD patients at two tertiary care centres (University of Calgary, University of Alberta, Canada) undergoing abdominal surgery between 2009 and 2016 was performed. Postoperative outcomes were compared against a control cohort of anti-TNF-treated patients over the same time-period. The primary outcome was occurrence of postoperative complications up to six months postoperatively, stratified by timing (early <30 days vs. late complications ≥30 days). RESULTS: Twenty UST-treated patients and 40 anti-TNF-treated patients were included with a median preoperative treatment exposure of 6.5 months and 18 months, respectively (p=0.01). Bowel obstruction was the most common surgical indication in both cohorts. UST-treated patients were more likely to require an ostomy (70.0% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001) and be on combination therapy with either systemic corticosteroids or concurrent immunomodulators (azathioprine or methotrexate) (25.0% vs. 2.5%, p=0.01). Despite the increased concomitant use of immunosuppression in the UST-treated cohort, there were no significant differences in early or late postoperative wound infections (1/20 in UST-cohort, 2/40 in anti-TNF cohort, p=1.00), anastomotic leak (0/20 in UST-cohort, 3/40 in anti-TNF cohort, p=0.54), or postoperative ileus/obstruction (3/20 in UST-cohort, 4/40 in anti-TNF cohort, p=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: CD patients receiving preoperative UST did not experience an increase in postoperative complications, despite increased use of concurrent immunosuppression.

Long-term Maintenance of Clinical, Endoscopic, and Radiographic Response to Ustekinumab in Moderate-to-Severe Crohn's Disease: Real-world Experience from a Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukins 12 and 23. While effective in clinical trials for Crohn's disease (CD), long-term maintenance of response in the real-world setting is unclear. We aim to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab for maintaining clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic response in CD. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed on patients with CD achieving steroid-free clinical response to ustekinumab induction, and advanced onto a regularly scheduled maintenance ustekinumab regimen between 2011 and 2016. The primary outcome was loss of response, defined by an increase in Harvey Bradshaw Index of >3 points from baseline requiring ustekinumab dose escalation, reinduction, rescue corticosteroids, immunomodulators, surgery, or ustekinumab discontinuation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify clinical factors associated with loss of response. RESULTS: One hundred four patients with CD achieving steroid-free response with ustekinumab induction were included; 92.3% (96/104) had previously failed antitumor necrosis factor therapy. Median follow-up was 57.2 weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 36.7-103.4). Cumulative probability of maintained response at 52 weeks was 71.8%. Sixty-seven patients (64.4%) maintained endoscopic or radiographic response. Thirty-five patients (33.7%) lost response at a median time of 47.4 weeks (IQR: 35.3-68.4). Dose escalation was required in 17 patients (16.3%); response was recaptured in 9/17 (52.9%). Nine patients (8.7%) required surgery. In Cox multivariate regression, concurrent immunomodulation was associated with reduced risk of loss of response (hazards ratio 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17-0.92)). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous ustekinumab is an effective treatment option for maintaining long-term clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic response in patients with moderate-to-severe CD failing antitumor necrosis factor therapy.

Appropriateness of Testing for Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agent and Antibody Concentrations, and Interpretation of Results.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The availability of tests for blood concentrations of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and antibodies against these drugs could improve dose selection for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is little consensus on when to test and how to interpret test results. We used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to determine when these tests are appropriate and how to clinically interpret their results. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in November 2013 to identify observational or experimental studies of the measurement of anti-TNF drug and antibody concentrations in patients with IBD and interpretation of their results. We developed 35 scenarios that assessed the appropriateness of testing and 143 scenarios that addressed clinical strategies in response to test results, and presented the findings to an expert panel. The appropriateness of each scenario was rated before and after an in-person meeting with the panel. Panelists rated the appropriateness of various clinical management options including changing therapy within class, switching out of class, adjusting drug dose or interval, adding or adjusting concomitant immune modulators, and doing nothing for each of 6 permutations of high versus low drug concentrations and high, low, or undetectable antibody concentrations. Disagreement was assessed using a validated index. RESULTS: Assessment of anti-TNF drug and antibody concentrations was rated appropriate at the end of induction therapy in primary nonresponders, in secondary nonresponders, at least once during the first year of maintenance therapy, and following a drug holiday. Routine assessment in responders at the end of induction was rated uncertain. In nearly all scenarios, escalation of drug dosing was rated appropriate when drug concentration was low in the absence of antibodies, and switching within class was rated appropriate when antibodies were present. Other recommendations depended on the specific clinical scenario for which the test was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method of analysis, an expert panel recommends testing for drug and antibody concentrations in many clinical scenarios. The appropriate timing and best way to respond to anti-TNF drug and antibody testing for IBD depends on the specific clinical scenario. These recommendations can help guide clinicians to best optimize anti-TNF therapy.

Recommendations for Quality Colonoscopy Reporting for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results from a RAND Appropriateness Panel.

BACKGROUND: Consensus on what constitutes a quality colonoscopy report for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is lacking. We developed a template for quality colonoscopy reporting that can be used broadly by endoscopists. METHODS: After a literature review of topics relevant to colonoscopy reporting, members of the Building Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Globally (BRIDGe) group and 2 external experts proposed candidate reporting elements. The RAND/University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness method was applied to rate the importance and feasibility of elements for inclusion in colonoscopy reports for patients with IBD. Panelists used the modified Delphi method to anonymously rate the importance and feasibility of candidate elements on a 1-to-9 scale (1-3: not important/feasible, 4-6: moderately important/feasible, 7-9: very important/feasible). Disagreement was assessed using a validated index. The panelists then met in person for discussion followed by a second round of voting. Elements rated a median of 7 or higher on importance after rerating were retained. RESULTS: One hundred two reporting elements were proposed. A total of 48 elements were retained across the four themes of "disease background," "findings and interventions," "Crohn's disease with an ileocolonic anastomosis," and "pouchoscopy." CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive list of recommended elements for quality IBD colonoscopy reporting stratified by clinical scenario has been described, using a rigorous and evidence-based approach. These elements can be incorporated into endoscopy reporting software platforms. Standardized endoscopy reporting may improve the quality of care in IBD.

Defining quality indicators for best-practice management of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of published data regarding the quality of care of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Canada. Clinical quality indicators are quantitative end points used to guide, monitor and improve the quality of patient care. In Canada, where universal health care can vary significantly among provinces, quality indicators can be used to identify potential gaps in the delivery of IBD care and standardize the approach to interprovincial management. METHODS: The Emerging Practice in IBD Collaborative (EPIC) group generated a shortlist of IBD quality indicators based on a comprehensive literature review. An iterative voting process was used to select quality indicators to take forward. In a face-to-face meeting with the EPIC group, available evidence to support each quality indicator was presented by the EPIC member aligned to it, followed by group discussion to agree on the wording of the statements. The selected quality indicators were then ratified in a final vote by all EPIC members. RESULTS: Eleven quality indicators for the management of IBD within the single-payer health care system of Canada were developed. These focus on accurate diagnosis, appropriate and timely management, disease monitoring, and prevention or treatment of complications of IBD or its therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These quality indicators are measurable, reflective of the evidence base and expert opinion, and define a standard of care that is at least a minimum that should be expected for IBD management in Canada. The next steps for the EPIC group involve conducting research to assess current practice across Canada as it pertains to these quality indicators and to measure the impact of each of these indicators on patient outcomes.

A survey of perceptions and practices of complementary alternative medicine among Canadian gastroenterologists.

BACKGROUND: Despite a high prevalence of complementary alternative medicine (CAM) use among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, there is a dearth of information about the attitudes and perceptions of CAM among the gastroenterologists who treat these patients. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the beliefs, perceptions and practices of gastroenterologists toward CAM use in patients with IBD. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to member gastroenterologists of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. The survey included multiple-choice and Likert scale questions that queried physician knowledge and perceptions of CAM and their willingness to discuss CAM with patients. RESULTS: Fifty-three per cent of respondents considered themselves to be IBD subspecialists. The majority (86%) of gastroenterologists reported that less than one-half of their patient population had mentioned the use of CAM. Only 8% of physicians reported initiating a conversation about CAM in the majority of their patient encounters. Approximately one-half (51%) of respondents were comfortable with discussing CAM with their patients, with lack of knowledge being cited as the most common reason for discomfort with the topic. Most gastroenterologists (79%) reported no formal education in CAM. While there was uncertainty as to whether CAM interfered with conventional medications, most gastroenterologists believed it could be effective as an adjunct treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that gastroenterologists were hesitant to initiate discussions about CAM with patients. Nearly one-half were uncomfortable or only somewhat comfortable with the topic, and most may benefit from CAM educational programs. Interestingly, most respondents appeared to be receptive to CAM as adjunct therapy alongside conventional IBD treatment.

Colometer: a real-time quality feedback system for screening colonoscopy.

AIM: To investigate the performance of a new software-based colonoscopy quality assessment system. METHODS: The software-based system employs a novel image processing algorithm which detects the levels of image clarity, withdrawal velocity, and level of the bowel preparation in a real-time fashion from live video signal. Threshold levels of image blurriness and the withdrawal velocity below which the visualization could be considered adequate have initially been determined arbitrarily by review of sample colonoscopy videos by two experienced endoscopists. Subsequently, an overall colonoscopy quality rating was computed based on the percentage of the withdrawal time with adequate visualization (scored 1-5; 1, when the percentage was 1%-20%; 2, when the percentage was 21%-40%, etc.). In order to test the proposed velocity and blurriness thresholds, screening colonoscopy withdrawal videos from a specialized ambulatory colon cancer screening center were collected, automatically processed and rated. Quality ratings on the withdrawal were compared to the insertion in the same patients. Then, 3 experienced endoscopists reviewed the collected videos in a blinded fashion and rated the overall quality of each withdrawal (scored 1-5; 1, poor; 3, average; 5, excellent) based on 3 major aspects: image quality, colon preparation, and withdrawal velocity. The automated quality ratings were compared to the averaged endoscopist quality ratings using Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Fourteen screening colonoscopies were assessed. Adenomatous polyps were detected in 4/14 (29%) of the collected colonoscopy video samples. As a proof of concept, the Colometer software rated colonoscope withdrawal as having better visualization than the insertion in the 10 videos which did not have any polyps (average percent time with adequate visualization: 79% ± 5% for withdrawal and 50% ± 14% for insertion, P < 0.01). Withdrawal times during which no polyps were removed ranged from 4-12 min. The median quality rating from the automated system and the reviewers was 3.45 [interquartile range (IQR), 3.1-3.68] and 3.00 (IQR, 2.33-3.67) respectively for all colonoscopy video samples. The automated rating revealed a strong correlation with the reviewer's rating (ρ coefficient= 0.65, P = 0.01). There was good correlation of the automated overall quality rating and the mean endoscopist withdrawal speed rating (Spearman r coefficient= 0.59, P = 0.03). There was no correlation of automated overall quality rating with mean endoscopists image quality rating (Spearman r coefficient= 0.41, P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The results from a novel automated real-time colonoscopy quality feedback system strongly agreed with the endoscopists' quality assessments. Further study is required to validate this approach.

Patient-specific approach to combination versus monotherapy with the use of antitumor necrosis factor α agents for inflammatory bowel disease.

It is likely that the debate surrounding combination versus monotherapy will continue for the foreseeable future, because there will always be a risk-benefit ratio that must be taken into account with IBD therapy. However, because more studies now include a thoughtful approach with respect to concomitant IS therapy with inclusion of objective end points such as mucosal healing and drug pharmacokinetics, it is anticipated that this issue will become clearer over time, which will benefit patients and practitioners. The BRIDGe approach described in this review is a useful tool but must be taken in the context of the subjectivity of much of the analyzed data and the individual perspectives that influenced the results. It cannot in any way be interpreted as a clinical practice guideline or standard of care, but rather a tool that seeks to interpret and incorporate the available literature and, it is hoped, aid clinicians in making sense of the conflicting data in this area. The decision regarding the risks and benefits of combination therapy must be carefully weighed in each individual patient.

Assessment of variables associated with smoking cessation in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who smoke have a more complicated disease course. AIMS: Our primary objective was to assess smoking related variables that were associated with smoking cessation versus continued smoking in patients with CD. METHODS: A multi-center study identified CD patients who were seen at the University of Chicago and University of Calgary IBD clinics. Patients were categorized into three subgroups: lifetime non-smokers, current smokers, or ex-smokers. Participants completed questionnaires assessing their cigarette smoking behavior. Current smokers were prospectively followed for 6 months to assess smoking status and attempts to quit. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with smoking cessation. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were enrolled with 148 identifying themselves as lifetime non-smokers, 70 as current smokers, and 82 as ex-smokers. Patients who reported their first cigarette within 5 min of waking were more likely to be current smokers (OR = 21; 95% CI 3.94-107.3) as compared to patients who waited greater than 60 min. Current smokers were more likely to have one or more household members who smoked compared to ex-smokers (P < 0.05). Nearly half (49%) of the current smokers were in the precontemplation stage of change (i.e. no intention to quit smoking). At the 6-month follow-up, only 11% reported they quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who report a short time to first cigarette in the morning may have more difficulty in smoking cessation. Current smokers were more likely to have another smoker in the household compared to ex-smokers. Current smokers had low levels of motivation to quit smoking and consequently with no intervention, very few quit 6 months after the baseline assessment.

The appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents for Crohn's disease: one size does not fit all.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is no consensus on the appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for Crohn's disease. Some patients benefit from concomitant immunomodulators, but concerns related to infections and lymphoma risk have dampened enthusiasm for this approach. We applied the RAND/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method toward establishing appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators and anti-TNF therapies for Crohn's disease. METHODS: A literature review was conducted regarding efficacy and safety of concomitant immunomodulators in the setting of anti-TNF therapy for Crohn's disease and presented to the Building Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Globally group, a globally diverse panel of 13 gastroenterologists clinically experienced in inflammatory bowel disease. A total of 134 scenarios were constructed using several clinical variables. Panelists used a modified Delphi method to rate the appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators, and met to discuss and re-rate appropriateness. Disagreement was assessed using a validated index. RESULTS: Concomitant immunomodulators were generally rated appropriate for 63 scenarios, uncertain for 60 scenarios, and inappropriate for 11 scenarios. In general, concomitant immunomodulators were appropriate for those with extensive disease, shorter duration of disease, perianal involvement, prior surgery, females, and older patients (>26 y). Concomitant immunomodulators were generally rated inappropriate for young males, and in some scenarios involving uncomplicated disease. Smoking and the particular anti-TNF medication did not influence ratings. Disagreement was observed in 6 of 134 scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators with anti-TNF therapy for Crohn's disease was determined through a modified Delphi panel approach based on expert interpretation of the available literature. Clinicians should consider multiple factors when considering concomitant immunomodulators with anti-TNF treatment.

Evolving inflammatory bowel disease treatment paradigms: top-down versus step-up.

Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) comprise a group of inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that can vary in severity of disease, anatomic extent of inflammation, presence and nature of extraintestinal manifestations, and response to therapeutic approaches. There have been attempts to classify CD based on the location and behavior of disease. Advances in understanding of genetic susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) suggest that CD and UC may represent a continuum of overlapping disorders. This has led to an attempt to classify IBD on clinical, molecular, and serologic grounds. Differences in clinical, genetic, and immunologic profiles may require more targeted, refined treatment approaches to help clinicians make decisions regarding recently introduced biologic agents. This article provides an overview of the current approaches to therapy for CD and UC and focuses on the evidence supporting the rationale for changing paradigms in the management of IBD, including mucosal healing as an end point and earlier use of immunosuppressive and biologic agents, particularly in CD (so-called top-down therapy).

Evolving inflammatory bowel disease treatment paradigms: top-down versus step-up.

Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) comprise a group of inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that can vary in severity of disease, anatomic extent of inflammation, presence and nature of extraintestinal manifestations, and response to therapeutic approaches. There have been attempts to classify CD based on the location and behavior of disease. Advances in understanding of genetic susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) suggest that CD and UC may represent a continuum of overlapping disorders. This has led to an attempt to classify IBD on clinical, molecular, and serologic grounds. Differences in clinical, genetic, and immunologic profiles may require more targeted, refined treatment approaches to help clinicians make decisions regarding recently introduced biologic agents. This article provides an overview of the current approaches to therapy for CD and UC and focuses on the evidence supporting the rationale for changing paradigms in the management of IBD, including mucosal healing as an end point and earlier use of immunosuppressive and biologic agents, particularly in CD (so-called top-down therapy).