Down to the wire: Patient and family experiences of k-wire removal in a paediatric specialist clinic.

INTRODUCTION: K-wire removal is a common procedure in the paediatric outpatient clinic that is a source of pain and anxiety. This study examined the current parental experience of k wire removal. METHODS: Twenty-six parents of children having k-wires removed in a paediatric outpatient clinic were asked to complete an electronic survey immediately post procedure. Questions explored prior knowledge, sedation and analgesia for the procedure. Data analysis used descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Verbal information from the ward prior to the procedure was the greatest information source for parents 22/26(85%). Thirty-eight % (10/26) of parents had expected sedation but only 6/10(23%) reported receiving sedation information. Only 7/26(27%) of parents reported their child receiving analgesia from themselves or medical staff pre-procedure. DISCUSSION: Parents recommended the need for more procedural information beforehand, especially regarding pain and sedation. Parents were unaware of the option of sedation and wanted analgesia before the procedure.

The clinical utility of the pain assessment tool in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates.

BACKGROUND: The neonatal Pain Assessment Tool (PAT) is considered a reliable and valid tool for assessing neonatal pain. No research has been conducted on the clinical utility of the PAT when assessing pain in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the clinical utility of the PAT when assessing pain in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates. METHODS: Neonatal nurses from the Royal Children's Hospital completed online surveys to assess the clinical utility of the PAT. Three focus groups were then conducted to further explore the variation of pain scores from the survey and clarify the challenges in interpreting the pain score. RESULTS: Nurses perceived the PAT clinically useful in neonates who were ventilated and minimally sedated. However, the PAT was not clinically useful in neonates who were ventilated and heavily sedated or muscle-relaxed. Further exploration via focus groups highlighted two themes related to the 'variation in the timing of the pain score' and the 'integration of critical thinking and judgement' used when assessing pain in neonates. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility of the PAT is acceptable for minimally sedated neonates; however, it decreases the more sedated a neonate becomes, and the PAT's usefulness is extremely poor in the muscle-relaxed neonate. A better understanding of the timing and interpretation of the pain score in relation to the neonate's clinical status may enable improved decision-making and pain management. The PAT requires further validity, reliability, and clinical utility research, particularly in critically ill and muscle-relaxed neonates.

An interpretive review of women's experiences of gestational diabetes mellitus: proposing a framework to enhance midwifery assessment.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects almost 5% of pregnancies in Australia, and within 15 years, 25% of affected women will go on to develop Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The adoption of preventive health behaviours may be influenced by women's experiences of GDM. QUESTION: This review sought to understand women's beliefs, values, perceptions and experiences following diagnosis of GDM. METHODS: Peer reviewed and professional journals were searched for primary research, published between January 1991 and December 2011 that explored the beliefs, values, perceptions and experiences of peripartum or postpartum women with a diagnosis or history of GDM. FINDINGS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and the majority of these studies were qualitative (n=15). Each study was reviewed and synthesis revealed three emergent themes and core concepts related to each theme: Responses (initial reaction to GDM diagnosis, negative thoughts following diagnosis, struggle to manage GDM, feelings of 'loss of control', changes to identity and adapting to change), Focus of Concern (concern for baby's health, mother's concern for her own health, perceived seriousness of GDM, perceived fear of T2DM) and Influencing Factors (cultural roles and beliefs, social stigmas, social support, professional support, adequate and appropriate information, social roles and barriers to self-care). CONCLUSION: The experiences of women with GDM are unique and personal however this review highlights common experiences evident in the existing research. The proposed framework may be used by midwives in clinical assessment and care of women diagnosed with GDM.