Evaluating the effectiveness of patient tailored treatment for patients with non-specific low back pain: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review summarizes the relevant literature on the effectiveness of tailored interventions in non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). METHODS: The search strategy has been executed in December 2019 in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were done independently by two authors. RESULTS: A total six eligible studies were identified. Five out of six articles used a classification system to subgroup patients. All active patient tailored interventions had similar or better results than the non-patient tailored interventions, most importantly on pain (short- and mid-term, not for long term follow-up). Two motor control interventions revealed sustained or increased effects at 12 months follow-up for disability. For cost-effectiveness, medication use and work absenteeism, results were inconclusive. Global rating of change evaluation confirmed significant between-group results at 10 weeks to 4 months follow-up, but results were not maintained at 12-month evaluation. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: Our findings support the preliminary evidence for the use of patient tailored treatment for reductions in pain and disability. However, our results are of very low to moderate quality evidence and the observed effects strongly depend on the subgroups and the chosen interventions. More high-quality RCT's with homogenous designs and larger sample sizes are needed.

Articular dysfunction patterns in patients with mechanical low back pain: A clinical algorithm to guide specific mobilization and manipulation techniques.

Recent systematic reviews have demonstrated reasonable evidence that lumbar mobilization and manipulation techniques are beneficial. However, knowledge on optimal techniques and doses, and its clinical reasoning is currently lacking. To address this, a clinical algorithm is presented so as to guide therapists in their clinical reasoning to identify patients who are likely to respond to lumbar mobilization and/or manipulation and to direct appropriate technique selection. Key features in subjective and clinical examination suggestive of mechanical nociceptive pain probably arising from articular structures, can categorize patients into distinct articular dysfunction patterns. Based on these patterns, specific mobilization and manipulation techniques are suggested. This clinical algorithm is merely based on empirical clinical expertise and complemented through knowledge exchange between international colleagues. The added value of the proposed articular dysfunction patterns should be considered within a broader perspective.