Minimally invasive management of chylous fistula after esophagectomy.

Chyle leak is an unwelcome complication of esophagectomy that is associated with a high mortality. The diagnosis of this condition may be difficult or delayed and requires a high index of suspicion. Management varies from conservative treatment with drainage, intravenous nutrition, treatment and prevention of septic complications, to re-operation, either by thoracotomy or laparotomy to control the fistula. To reduce the mortality, early surgical intervention is advised and a minimally invasive approach has recently been reported in several cases. From June 2002 through August 2005 we have used video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to diagnose and treat chyle fistulas from 6/129 (5%) patients who underwent esophagectomy for resectable carcinoma of the esophagus or high-grade dysplasia. The fistula was successfully controlled in 5/6 cases by direct thoracoscopic application of a suture, clips or fibrin glue. One patient required a laparotomy and ligation of the cysterna chyli after thoracoscopy failed to identify an intrathoracic source of the leak. An early minimally invasive approach can be safely and effectively applied to the diagnosis and management of post-esophagectomy chylous fistula in the majority of cases. Open surgery may be appropriate where minimally invasive approaches fail or where the availability of such skills is limited.

Effect of surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus on the clinical outcome of oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance programmes for Barrett's oesophagus have been implemented in an effort to detect oesophageal adenocarcinoma at an earlier and potentially curable stage. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of endoscopic surveillance on the clinical outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma complicating Barrett's oesophagus. METHOD: Consecutive patients who underwent oesophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett's oesophagus were studied retrospectively. The pathological stage and survival of patients identified as part of a surveillance programme were compared with those of patients presenting with symptomatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Seventeen patients in the surveillance group and 74 in the non-surveillance group underwent oesophagectomy. Disease detected in the surveillance programme was at a significantly earlier stage: 13 of 17 versus 11 of 74 stage 0 or I, three versus 26 stage II, and one versus 37 stage III or IV (P < 0.001). Lymphatic metastases were seen in three of 17 patients in the surveillance group and 42 of 74 who were not under surveillance (P = 0.004). Three-year survival was 80 and 31 per cent respectively (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Patients with surveillance-detected adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus are diagnosed at an earlier stage and have a better prognosis than those who present with symptomatic tumours.

Multivariate analysis of clinical, operative and pathologic features of esophageal cancer: who needs adjuvant therapy?

The failure of adjuvant therapy to significantly improve the prognosis of patients undergoing esophago-gastrectomy for cancer may be because of poor patient selection. We sought prognostic factors that would identify those patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapy. Data on 15 possible prognostic factors were prospectively collected on 225 patients undergoing esophago-gastrectomy at a single institution, and univariate and multivariate analyzes performed. T, N, M and overall UICC stage, differentiation, involvement of the circumferential resection margin and number of metastatic of lymph nodes were identified as significant prognostic factors by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that the completeness of resection (R-category), ratio of metastatic to total nodes resected and the presence of vascular invasion were independently significant prognostic factors. Following R0 or R1 resection, patients with a metastatic to total lymph node ratio > 0.2 and /or the presence of vascular invasion have a poor prognosis, and the effects of adjuvant therapy in these patients should be studied.

Evaluation of POSSUM in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing resection.

BACKGROUND: The Physiogical and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) has been used to produce a numerical estimate of expected mortality and morbidity after a variety of general surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of POSSUM to predict mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. METHODS: POSSUM predictor equations for morbidity and mortality were applied retrospectively to 204 patients who had undergone oesophagectomy for cancer. Observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with rates predicted by POSSUM using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Evaluation of the discriminative capability of POSSUM predictor equations was performed using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The observed and predicted mortality rates were 12.7 and 19.1 per cent respectively, and the respective morbidity rates were 53.4 and 62.3 per cent. However, the POSSUM model showed a poor fit with the data both for the observed 30-day mortality (chi2 = 16.26, P = 0.002) and morbidity (chi2 = 63.14, P < 0.001) using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. ROC curve analysis revealed that POSSUM had poor predictive accuracy both for mortality (area under curve 0.62) and morbidity (area under curve 0.55). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that POSSUM does not accurately predict mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing oesophagectomy and must be modified.

Does pneumatic dilatation affect the outcome of laparoscopic cardiomyotomy?

BACKGROUND: Controversy surrounds the choice of laparoscopic cardiomyotomy as the primary treatment for achalasia or a second-line treatment following the failure of nonsurgical treatment. Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy can be more difficult technically following pneumatic dilatations. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome obtained with primary laparoscopic cardiomyotomy to that achieved when the procedure is performed following failed pneumatic dilatation. METHODS: Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy was performed in seven patients following a median of four pneumatic dilatations (group A) and in five patients as their primary treatment (group B). Outcome was measured using manometry, a modified DeMeester symptom scoring system, and a quality-of-life questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups A and B in sex, age, preoperative modified DeMeester score, or mean barrier pressure. Six of seven group A patients had evidence of periesophageal and submucosal fibrosis at surgery, but this condition was not seen in group B patients. The operative time was slightly longer in group A patients. There was no difference in complication rates (one primary hemorrhage in group A and one esophageal perforation in group B), and both groups had a significantly improved modified DeMeester score at 6 weeks and at long-term follow-up (median, 26 months). Eleven of 12 patients said that they would choose laparoscopic cardiomyotomy as their primary treatment if newly diagnosed with achalasia. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy is safe and effective as a primary or second-line treatment following pneumatic dilatations in patients with achalasia.

Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: For rectal carcinoma, the presence of tumour within 1 mm of the circumferential margin is an important independent prognostic factor for both local recurrence and survival. Similar prospective data have not been reported for oesophageal carcinoma and we wished to ascertain the prognostic importance of this variable following potentially curative resection for oesophageal carcinoma. AIM: To prospectively assess the impact of circumferential margin involvement (tumour within 1 mm) following potentially curative resection for oesophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, resection specimens of 135 patients treated with potentially curative oesophageal resection alone were studied for the presence of tumour within 1 mm of the circumferential margin (margin positive), using inked margins and cross sectional slicing of the specimen. All tumours were also staged using the 1987 UICC TNM classification. Patients were followed for a mean of 19 months, and overall and cancer specific survival analysed. RESULTS: The finding of tumour cells within 1 mm of the circumferential margin (CRM+) was a significant and independent predictor of survival following potentially curative oesophageal resection. Overall, 64 (47%) patients were CRM+. Median survival in this group was 21 months compared with 39 months in the CRM- group (p=0.015). The impact of CRM status on survival was only seen in patients with a low nodal metastatic burden (<25% nodes positive). The odds ratio for the risk of dying from oesophageal cancer was 2.08 when the CRM was involved (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of tumour within 1 mm of the circumferential margin following potentially curative resection for oesophageal carcinoma is an important independent prognostic variable and should be reported routinely.

Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparotomy remains the commonest intervention in patients with abdominal complications of laparoscopic surgery. Our own policy is to employ relaparoscopy to avoid diagnostic delay and unnecessary laparotomy. The results of using this policy in patients with suspected intra-abdominal complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy are reviewed. METHODS: Data were collected from laparoscopic cholecystectomies carried out by five consultant surgeons in one center. Details of relaparoscopy for complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent relaparoscopy within 7 days of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for intra-abdominal bleeding (2 patients) or abdominal pain (11 patients). The causes of pain were subhepatic haematoma (1), acute pancreatitis (1), small bowel injury (1), and minor bile leakage (6). In 2 patients no cause was identified. Twelve patients were managed laparoscopically and 1 patient required laparotomy. Median stay after relaparoscopy was 7 days (range 2 to 19). CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory laparotomy can be avoided by prompt relaparoscopy in the majority of patients with abdominal complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal insufflation to 15 mmHg diminishes venous return and reduces cardiac output. Such changes may be dangerous in patients with a poor cardiac reserve. The aim of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic effects of high (15 mmHg) and low (7 mmHg) intraabdominal pressure during laparoscopic cholestectomy (LC) METHODS: Twenty patients were randomized to either high- or low-pressure capnoperitoneum. Anesthesia was standardized, and the end-tidal CO2 was maintained at 4.5 kPa. Arterial blood pressure was measured invasively. Heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output were measured by transesophageal doppler. RESULTS: There were 10 patients in each group. In the high-pressure group, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) increased during insufflation. Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output were depressed by a maximum of 26% and 28% (SV 0.1 > p > 0.05, cardiac output p > 0. 1). In the low-pressure group, insufflation produced a rise in MABP and a peak rise in both stroke volume and cardiac output of 10% and 28%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible for LC and minimizes the adverse hemodynamic effects of peritoneal insufflation.

Laparoscopic enucleation of a solitary pancreatic insulinoma.

Insulinomas are usually small, benign tumors of the pancreas, often found in obese patients, which require an incision that is out of all proportion to the size of the lesion. A laparoscopic technique for enucleation of a pancreatic insulinoma is described.

Micropuncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) significantly reduces the discomfort and disability typically associated with open cholecystectomy, but there is still room for improvement. METHODS: In order to further reduce the trauma of access, we have introduced a technique of micropuncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) that utilizes three 3-mm cannulae in addition to the standard 10-mm cannula at the umbilicus. MPLC was performed in 25 patients (median age, 52 years; m/f, three of 22) with symptomatic cholelithiasis. RESULTS: The operation was completed in all patients. The median duration of surgery was 75 min (range, 45-180). Sixteen patients were discharged the same day and nine patients the next day. All the patients had an uncomplicated recovery. Only eight patients requested postoperative analgesia while in hospital. Micropuncture exploration of the bile duct was carried out in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: MPLC is a feasible and safe technique that appears to improve on the benefits of LC; it makes the operation even more feasible as a day-surgery procedure.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after pancreatic debridement.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic debridement is a lifesaving operation in patients with severe acute pancreatitis and pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis. Even in the presence of gallstones, cholecystectomy may be avoided during the procedure, but definitive treatment of the stones is needed at a later stage. METHODS: Five patients (median age 58 years) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, at a median time interval of 15 months, after pancreatic debridement via a dome-shaped upper abdominal incision for severe acute pancreatitis. The use of alternative methods for primary access, additional cannulae to enable division of adhesions, the harmonic scalpel, and the fundus first technique made the laparoscopic approach possible and safe. RESULTS: The median operating time was 130 min. Four patients were discharged home the first or second postoperative day. One patient required a "mini-laparotomy" for drainage of a periumbilical hematoma and was discharged on the 13th day. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be considered an effective and safe approach for the treatment of gallstones in patients who have undergone pancreatic debridement.

Long operation and the risk of complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Data collected prospectively from patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under one consultant surgical team were analysed to examine the influence of duration of operation on postoperative complications. METHODS: Between June 1990 and March 1994, 411 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, of which nine (2.2 per cent) were converted to open operation. Patients whose laparoscopic operation took 3 h or more (32 patients) were compared with those whose operation took less than 3 h (370 patients) with respect to postoperative complications. RESULTS: There was a higher incidence of acute biliary disease (28 versus 7.0 per cent), upper abdominal adhesions (16 versus 3.2 per cent), significant gallbladder adhesions (69 versus 25.4 per cent) and common bile duct exploration (16 versus 1.4 per cent) in patients having a long operation. Complications were divided into "surgical' and "general', and included cardiovascular, respiratory and thromboembolic events. The overall complication rate was 9 per cent in the long operation group and 3.8 per cent in the short operation group (P not significant) (4.2 per cent for both groups combined). No general complications occurred in those having a longer operation. CONCLUSION: The duration of operation does not affect the risk of general complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, so enabling the advantages of the minimally invasive approach to be realized in patients with more advanced biliary disease.

Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis occurs as a stress response to surgery and may predispose the patient to thromboembolic complications. Other components of the surgical stress response (cytokine release, neurohumoral response, etc.) have been shown to differ between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy, and the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of laparoscopic and open surgery on the coagulation and fibrinolytic pathways. METHODS: Fourteen patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 12 patients undergoing open cholecystectomy had blood taken in the perioperative period for fibrinopeptide A (FPA) prothrombin fragment F1.2, antithrombin 3, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and its fast-acting inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1 antigen and activity), and the euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT). RESULTS: The only significant differences between the two groups occurred 6 h after surgery when the ECLT was longer (p < 0.005; Mann Whitney), and PAI-1 antigen and activity were higher (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively; Mann Whitney) after open cholecystectomy than laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Other changes in fibrinolysis and coagulation were similar for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. With respect to hemostasis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not increase the risk of thromboembolic complications compared to the conventional procedure.

Conservative management of infective mastitis and breast abscesses after ultrasonographic assessment.

Current practice in this unit for a suspected breast abscess is preliminary ultrasonographic scan, aspiration of any pus, antibiotic therapy and repeat aspiration in the outpatient clinic if necessary. Inflammatory masses are treated with antibiotics alone. A retrospective review of this strategy has been made. Over a 2-year interval 53 patients were admitted to hospital with a suspected breast abscess. Twenty-two abscesses were aspirated, of which 19 resolved and three required subsequent incision and drainage. Eight patients underwent primary incision and drainage, one of whom required a second drainage procedure. In five patients the abscess discharged spontaneously before intervention. The remaining 18 patients were found on ultrasonography to have inflammation without evidence of focal pus which settled with antibiotic therapy in all but two patients. One of these was found to have an inflammatory cancer and the other developed an abscess, which was drained. Aspiration combined with ultrasonographic imaging is an effective alternative to incision and drainage.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy. A safe option during the second trimester?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones; while symptomatic gallstones during pregnancy are not frequent they are by no means rare. The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy is controversial but initial reports suggest it is both safe and feasible. METHODS: During a consecutive series of 500 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 3 patients have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy. The 3 patients were 16-27 weeks pregnant with an average age of 32 years. The indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was severe pain in two patients and gallstone pancreatitis in one patient. Following standard obstetric anesthesia, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Open cannulation was used to establish peritoneal access, following which "standard," four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed without complication. The insufflation pressure used was 8-10 mmHg CO2 and a liver retractor was employed to facilitate access. RESULTS: In each case the postoperative recovery was rapid and uneventful for both mother and fetus. The patients were discharged on the first or second postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the second trimester of pregnancy is both safe and feasible provided both suitable surgical and anesthetic expertise are available. Even up to the end of the second trimester there is sufficient access for the technique to be employed.

Laparoscopic splenectomy. The suspended pedicle technique.

BACKGROUND: Elective splenectomy is often performed for hematological diseases, some of which cause only moderate enlargement of the spleen. The avoidance of an extensive upper abdominal incision is desirable in such cases and laparoscopic splenectomy offers significant potential advantages over the open operation if it can be performed safely and economically. METHODS: Eight consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy. The operation was carried out with the patient at 40 degrees in the right lateral position so that rotating the operating table would make a full right lateral position possible. After fenestration of the gastrocolic omentum and division of the short gastric vessels, this position allowed the spleen to be pushed up under the diaphragm to facilitate access to the splenic vessels and the hilum. Vessels were divided individually between clips. RESULTS: All eight cases were completed laparoscopically. Mean length of operation was 259 min (range 230-285). Postoperative stay ranged from 2 to 7 days (median 4 days). There was no mortality, although minor complications did occur in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found laparoscopic splenectomy to be a safe and feasible procedure for the elective removal of the moderately enlarged spleen.

Radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Much of the morbidity of conventional esophagectomy for cancer is thought to relate to the thoracotomy wound and while transhiatal esophagectomy removes the need for a thoracotomy, it is not oncologically sound. Videothoracoscopy could potentially provide an oncologically sound means for resecting the thoracic esophagus without the need for a thorcotomy. METHODS: Between June 1991 and June 1994, thoracoscopic mobilization of the thoracic esophagus combined with radical lymphadenectomy was attempted in 24 patients as part of three-stage esophagectomy for cancer (5 squamous and 19 adenocarcinomas). Mean age was 59 years (range 43-76). Eight patients were ASA grade I, 10 were ASA II, and 6 ASA III. Two patients had early lesions (T1N0) but all other cancers were T2 or T3. Dissection of the thoracic esophagus was attempted via a right-sided approach, followed by a laparotomy and a cervical incision. RESULTS: The thoracoscopic procedure was successful in 22 patients; it was abandoned in one patient with dense pleural adhesions and in another with inoperable tumor. Mean duration of the thoracic component was 184 min(120-330). There were three post-operative deaths. Ten further patients had major complications. Median post-operative stay was 18 days(9-129). Mean node harvest was 13 nodes(6-28). Two-year survival (cancer specific) was 33%. CONCLUSIONS: Radical thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus is feasible, but the potential for complications remains high and requires further study.

Bile leakage following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now the treatment of choice for gallstones, but there has been concern that bile leakage with LC is more frequent than after open cholecystectomy (OC). We have analyzed our experience of this complication with regard to both its incidence and management. From a consecutive series of 500 LC, in which both operative cholangiography and drainage of the gallbladder bed were routine, bile leakage was identified in ten patients (2%). There was no bile duct injury. Nine of the ten patients presented with bile in the drain within 24 h of operation and one patient presented 1 week after operation with a subphrenic collection. Of the ten patients, five settled spontaneously. Of the five remaining patients, two needed laparotomy--one for a subphrenic collection not responding to percutaneous drainage and one for biliary peritonitis. One patient was treated by relaparoscopy and suture of a duct of Luschka and one patient had successful percutaneous drainage of an infected collection; the fifth patient who presented with a late subphrenic collection of bile was shown at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to have a cystic duct stump leak and was treated with an endoscopic stent. Bile leakage is seen more frequently after LC than OC for reasons that are currently unclear. We believe that the use of routine gallbladder bed drainage is justified for this reason alone. The majority of bile leaks settle either spontaneously or with minimally invasive intervention.

Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Removal of the gallbladder with commencement of dissection at the fundus is well recognized as a safe technique during difficult "open" cholecystectomy because it minimizes the risks of damage to the structures in or around Calot's triangle. We report here the routine employment of liver retractors and fundus-first dissection during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as an alternative to techniques previously described. Retraction of the liver and "fundus-first" dissection was used in 53 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecytectomy. There were 16 male and 37 female patients. Seven were operations performed during an acute admission and 20 had moderate or severe adhesions involving the gallbladder. Thirteen patients had a preexisting abdominal incision. The procedure was successful in 52 patients (98%), but in one patient it was converted to open operation because of dense adhesions. Median duration of operation was 90 min (range 35-240 min). There was no mortality and two complications (persistent right upper quadrant pain for 2 weeks after operation and bile leakage from the gallbladder bed). The facility to retract the liver and carry out a fundus-first dissection extends techniques developed for "open" surgery into the laparoscopic arena. It offers the surgeon the safety and versatility during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that it confers during conventional open surgery.