Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss ; 73(1): 57-62, 1980 Jan.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6770785

RESUMO

Three methods of measuring the ejection and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume were compared in 30 consecutive patients (all adults, 3 normal, 3 congestive cardiomyopathy, 6 mixed aortic valve disease, 9 pure aortic stenosis and 9 pure aortic incompetence). The haemodynamic and angiographical data was compared to the results of M-mode echocardiography and gammaangiocardiography. The global results of the ejection fractions were compared: angiography gave the lowest values (0,58 +/- 18). The non-invasive methods gave very similar results (0,67 +/- 15 for the echo and gammaangio). A better correlation was obtained in the group with pure aortic incompetence; the results in pure aortic stenosis were not reliable. The global results of end-diastolic volume showed constant underestimation by the non-invasive methods compared to angiography. The choice of method in each technique may influence the results obtained; each laboratory should determine its normal values; results should not be accepted without a critical assessment. Standardisation of techniques would be desirable.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias/fisiopatologia , Ecocardiografia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Hemodinâmica , Adulto , Idoso , Valva Aórtica , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Cintilografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...