Assuntos
Comportamento Alimentar , Obesidade/psicologia , Personalidade , Adulto , Imagem Corporal , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Relações Interpessoais , Obesidade/terapia , Fase OralRESUMO
Three methods of measuring the ejection and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume were compared in 30 consecutive patients (all adults, 3 normal, 3 congestive cardiomyopathy, 6 mixed aortic valve disease, 9 pure aortic stenosis and 9 pure aortic incompetence). The haemodynamic and angiographical data was compared to the results of M-mode echocardiography and gammaangiocardiography. The global results of the ejection fractions were compared: angiography gave the lowest values (0,58 +/- 18). The non-invasive methods gave very similar results (0,67 +/- 15 for the echo and gammaangio). A better correlation was obtained in the group with pure aortic incompetence; the results in pure aortic stenosis were not reliable. The global results of end-diastolic volume showed constant underestimation by the non-invasive methods compared to angiography. The choice of method in each technique may influence the results obtained; each laboratory should determine its normal values; results should not be accepted without a critical assessment. Standardisation of techniques would be desirable.