High-solids anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Effects of feedstock to inoculum ratio and percolate recirculation time.

The effects of feedstock to inoculum (F:I) ratio and percolate recirculation time (PRT) were studied for the high-solids anaerobic digestion (HSAD) of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Six mesophilic HSAD systems were operated at different F:I ratios (1 to 3 kg VS/kg VS; PRT = 2.5 h/d) and PRTs (1.5 to 3.5 h/d; F:I = 2 kg VS/kg VS). The F:I ratio of 1 provided up to 86% of the theoretical methane potential of OFMSW. In contrast, F:I ratio of 3 provided only 34% methane recovery due to volatile fatty acids (VFAs) accumulation and pH drop. Despite F:I ratio of 2 could provide 70% methane recovery, it could enable almost 45% higher organics processing capacity (VS basis) and lower solids washout during percolate recirculation, as compared to the F:I ratio of 1. However, different examined PRTs showed marginal impacts on methane yields with comparable changes in profiles of percolate characteristics.

Fate of disposable face masks in high-solids anaerobic digestion: Experimental observations and review of potential environmental implications.

Face masks became a part of our daily life amid the global COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Most of the face masks are made for single-use and primarily disposed of in garbage bins with other non-recyclable wastes. To date, little is known about how disposable face masks in municipal solid waste (MSW) would interfere with high-solids anaerobic digestion (HSAD) in waste management facilities. Here, we first report preliminary results from a lab experiment conducted with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) amended with used disposable face masks. The lab-scale HSAD systems were operated with percolate recirculation comparable to commercial HSAD systems typically used for full-scale processing of OFMSW. The results suggested that the presence of face masks in OFMSW could negatively affect methane productivity and kinetics. In the digesters amended with face masks, total cumulative methane production decreased by up to 18%, along with a 12-29% decrease in maximum methane production rates than the control digester (without face masks). Moreover, lag phases increased by 7-14%. The results also suggested that the type of polymeric materials used in face masks would be more critical than their total number/loading in the digester, which warrants further investigation. The visual inspection of digestate showed that the face masks were mostly undegraded after 40 days of operation. Much remains unknown about how the undegraded face masks will affect the digestate management practices, such as composting, land application, and landfilling. However, the review of existing literature suggested that they can be a potential source of plastic and microplastic pollution and amplify transmission of antibiotic resistance genes to the ecosystem. In summary, this study underscores the importance of developing safe and reliable disposal guidelines and management plans for single-use face masks.