The American Broncho-Esophagological Association Position Statement on Swallowing Fluoroscopy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an expert consensus statement on the clinical use of swallowing fluoroscopy in adults that reduces practice variation and identifies opportunities for quality improvement in the care of patients suffering from swallowing impairment. METHODOLOGY: A search strategist reviewed data sources (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus) to use as evidence for an expert development group to compose statements focusing on areas of controversy regarding swallowing fluoroscopy. Candidate statements underwent two iterations of a modified Delphi protocol to reach consensus. RESULTS: A total of 2184 publications were identified for title and abstract review with 211 publications meeting the criteria for full text review. Of these, 148 articles were included for review. An additional 116 publications were also included after reviewing the references of the full text publications from the initial search. These 264 references guided the authors to develop 41 candidate statements in various categories. Forty statements encompassing patient selection, fluoroscopic study choice, radiation safety, clinical team dynamics, training requirements, videofluoroscopic swallow study and esophagram techniques, and interpretation of swallowing fluoroscopy met criteria for consensus. One statement on esophagram technique reached near-consensus. CONCLUSIONS: These 40 statements pertaining to the comprehensive use of swallowing fluoroscopy in adults can guide the development of best practices, improve quality and safety of care, and influence policy in both the outpatient and inpatient settings. The lack of consensus on some aspects of esophagram technique likely reflects gaps in knowledge and clinical practice variation and should be a target for future research. Laryngoscope, 133:255-268, 2023.

Upper Instrumented Vertebrae, Number of Levels Fused, and Plate Morphology Do Not Affect Severity of Chronic Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Disordered swallowing, or dysphagia, is the most common complication after anterior cervical spine (ACS) surgery. Many operative factors are associated with development of dysphagia. The aim of this study was to explore how number of levels instrumented, specific levels fused, and plate morphology affect chronic dysphagia after ACS surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to a tertiary center for otolaryngology evaluation for chronic dysphagia after ACS surgery between 2012 and 2017 were enrolled. Basic demographic data were obtained. Plain radiographs were reviewed for number of levels fused, upper instrumented vertebrae, and plate morphology. Plate morphology was categorized as a closed, small window, large window, or no profile plate. The 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was used to assess dysphagia severity. RESULTS: Of 171 patients referred for dysphagia, 126 met inclusion criteria; 54% were female, with a mean age of 63 years (range, 32-88 years). Mean EAT-10 score was 18.5 ± 10.1. Mean time from spine surgery to videofluoroscopic swallow study for dysphagia was 58.3 months. Mean number of levels fused was 2.2 ± 0.9. There were no significant differences in EAT-10 scores in single-level versus multilevel fusion (19.0 vs. 18.4, P = 0.76) as well as with regard to upper instrumented vertebrae or plate morphology. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients with chronic dysphagia following ACS surgery, the severity of dysphagia as measured by the EAT-10 was not affected by upper instrumented vertebrae, number of levels fused, or plate morphology.

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus status on laryngeal cancer survival and locoregional control.

OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term outcomes of laryngeal cancer (LC) in people living with HIV (PLWH) versus uninfected individuals and determine how clinical and viral factors-such as demographics, cancer stage, HIV viral load, and CD4 nadir-contribute to these outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of 749 patients seen for LC at a single tertiary care center between 2003 and 2017. Of these, 22 had HIV at the time of LC diagnosis, and they were matched in a 1:4 ratio to uninfected controls based on sex, presence of smoking history, and age at cancer diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to identify overall and disease-free survival differences based on HIV status, as well as other clinical and viral factors. RESULTS: Compared to all uninfected individuals, PLWH were diagnosed with LC approximately 6 years younger (p = .013). 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival for PLWH were 86.4% (63.4%-95.4%), 77.3% (53.7%-89.9%), and 65.8% (40.8%-82.2%), respectively following LC diagnosis, and HIV was not significantly associated with overall (HR = 3.34 [0.59-18.79]) or disease-free survival (HR = 2.12 [0.71-6.36]). The incidence rate of locoregional recurrence among PLWH was 541 compared to 371 per 10,000 person-years in controls, which were not significantly different (p = .420). Furthermore, among PLWH, peak viral load and CD4 nadir were not associated with overall or disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: While previous work has shown that HIV is associated with elevated risk of LC, survival did not differ significantly between PLWH and uninfected individuals in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

An Otolaryngologist Redeployed to a COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit: Lessons Learned.

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a significant personnel burden on intensive care units across the globe. Physicians from various specialties, including otolaryngology, have heeded the call and been redeployed to provide support, serving in a capacity outside their usual scope of practice. The author shares personal experience from redeployment and provides a framework for otolaryngologists to maximize their impact while providing high-quality patient care and preserving their personal safety.