A New Method to Evaluate Pressure Distribution Using a 3D-Printed C2-C3 Cervical Spine Model with an Embedded Sensor Array.

Cervical degenerative disc diseases such as myelopathy and radiculopathy often require conventional treatments like artificial cervical disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). When designing a medical device, like the stand-alone cage, there are many design inputs to consider. However, the precise biomechanics of the force between the vertebrae and implanted devices under certain conditions require further investigation. In this study, a new method was developed to evaluate the pressure between the vertebrae and implanted devices by embedding a sensor array into a 3D-printed C2-C3 cervical spine. The 3D-printed cervical spine model was subjected to a range of axial loads while under flexion, extension, bending and compression conditions. Cables were used for the application of a preload and a robotic arm was used to recreate the natural spine motions (flexion, extension, and bending). To verify and predict the total pressure between the vertebrae and the implanted devices, a 3D finite element (FE) numerical mathematical model was developed. A preload was represented by applying 22 N of force on each of the anterior tubercles for the C2 vertebra. The results of this study suggest that the sensor is useful in identifying static pressure. The pressure with the robot arm was verified from the FE results under all conditions. This study indicates that the sensor array has promising potential to reduce the trial and error with implants for various surgical procedures, including multi-level artificial cervical disk replacement and ACDF, which may help clinicians to reduce pain, suffering, and costly follow-up procedures.

Effect of graded posterior element and ligament removal on annulus stress and segmental stability in lumbar spine stenosis: a finite element analysis study.

The study aimed to investigate the impact of posterior element and ligament removal on the maximum von Mises stress, and maximum shear stress of the eight-layer annulus for treating stenosis at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels in the lumbar spine. Previous studies have indicated that laminectomy alone can result in segmental instability unless fusion is performed. However, no direct correlations have been established regarding the impact of posterior and ligament removal. To address this gap, four models were developed: Model 1 represented the intact L2-L5 model, while model 2 involved a unilateral laminotomy involving the removal of a section of the L4 inferior lamina and 50% of the ligament flavum between L4 and L5. Model 3 consisted of a complete laminectomy, which included the removal of the spinous process and lamina of L4, as well as the relevant connecting ligaments between L3-L4 and L4-L5 (ligament flavum, interspinous ligament, supraspinous ligament). In the fourth model, a complete laminectomy with 50% facetectomy was conducted. This involved the same removals as in model 3, along with a 50% removal of the inferior/superior facets of L4 and a 50% removal of the facet capsular ligaments between L3-L4 and L4-L5. The results indicated a significant change in the range of motion (ROM) at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels during flexion and torque situations, but no significant change during extension and bending simulation. The ROM increased by 10% from model 1 and 2 to model 3, and by 20% to model 4 during flexion simulation. The maximum shear stress and maximum von-Mises stress of the annulus and nucleus at the L3-L4 levels exhibited the greatest increase during flexion. In all eight layers of the annulus, there was an observed increase in both the maximum shear stress and maximum von-Mises stress from model 1&2 to model 3 and model 4, with the highest rate of increase noted in layers 7&8. These findings suggest that graded posterior element and ligament removal have a notable impact on stress distribution and range of motion in the lumbar spine, particularly during flexion.

A Review of Finite Element Modeling for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

The cervical spine poses many complex challenges that require complex solutions. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been one such technique often employed to address such issues. In order to address the problems with ACDF and assess the modifications that have been made to the technique over time, finite element analyses (FEA) have proven to be an effective tool. The variations of cervical spine FEA models that have been produced over the past couple of decades, particularly more recent representations of more complex geometries, have not yet been identified and characterized in any literature. Our objective was to present material property models and cervical spine models for various simulation purposes. The outlining and refinement of the FEA process will yield more reliable outcomes and provide a stable basis for the modeling protocols of the cervical spine.

Factors influencing cage subsidence in anterior cervical corpectomy and discectomy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Various factors have been examined in relation to cage subsidence risk, including cage material, cage geometry, bone mineral density, device type, surgical level, bone graft, and patient age. The present study aims to compare and synthesize the literature of both clinical and biomechanical studies to evaluate and present the factors associated with cage subsidence. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature from January 2003 to December 2021 was conducted using the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Following the screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 49 clinical studies were included. Correlations between clinical and biomechanical studies are also discussed. RESULTS: Patients treated with the cage and plate combination had a lower subsidence rate than patients with the stand-alone cage. Overall, Polyetheretherketone material was shown to have a lower subsidence rate than titanium and other materials. The subsidence rate was also higher when the surgery was performed at levels C5-C7 than at levels C2-C5. No significant correlation was found between age and cage subsidence clinically. CONCLUSIONS: Cage subsidence increases the stress on the anterior fixation system and may cause biomechanical instability. Severe cage subsidence decreases the Cobb angle and intervertebral height, which may cause destabilization of the implant system, such as screw/plate loosening or breakage of the screw/plate. Various factors have been shown to influence the risk of cage subsidence. Examining clinical research alongside biomechanical studies offers a more comprehensive understanding of the subject.