RESUMO
Aim: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia (IH) repair is an alternative to open surgery. A potential advantage of laparoscopic repair is prevention of contralateral metachronous hernia although some studies report higher recurrence rate. We aim to determine the cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic IH repair taking into account metachronous and recurrence rates. Methods: Retrospective single-center study of children (<5 years) undergoing elective open or laparoscopic repair for a unilateral IH between February 2018 and October 2019. Ten cases in each of four groups were included (open day case, open overnight, laparoscopic day case, and laparoscopic overnight). Cases incurring a higher cost due to comorbidities or additional procedure were excluded. Patient-level information and costing system data were obtained from the hospital finance. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) procedural cost was compared for open and laparoscopic procedures. A financial model was created factoring metachronous and recurrent rates. Results: Cost of open day case repair was £1866.24 (SD: 311.15) compared with £2210.13 (SD: 391.36) for day case laparoscopic repair. For overnight repair, cost of open was £2442.82 (SD: 497.05) compared with £2585.35 (SD: 384.66) for laparoscopic. On calculating the cost-effectiveness point using the difference in metachronous and recurrence rate between the two procedures, laparoscopic is more cost-effective than open day case repair at 18.43%. For overnight repair, the difference rate is 5.84%. Conclusion: Our data suggest that based on metachronous and recurrence rates in the current literature, laparoscopic IH repair is more cost-effective than open repair for cases requiring overnight stay, whereas for day case procedures open IH repair is more cost-effective.
