Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Virol Methods ; 299: 114338, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34695479

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections relies on the use of sensitive, accurate and high throughput RT-PCR assays. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the analytical performance of the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 (RT-SARS), Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 (AlinSARS) assays and compared the clinical performance of the RT-SARS, AlinSARS, and Alinity m Resp-4-Plex (Alin4Plex) assays to the Seegene Allplex assay (Allplex) and an inhouse test (Inhouse). RESULTS: We found 100 % positive percent agreement (PPA) and 100 % negative percent agreement (NPA) comparing RT-SARS and Allplex. RT-SARS, AlinSARS and Inhouse showed 100 % NPA and 100 % PPA across all assays, except for the RdRp target of Inhouse (PPA = 84 %). Similarly, Alin4Plex and Allplex showed high agreement with specimens containing either SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, or RSV. Detection rates of 100 % for SARS-CoV-2 at 50 copies/mL, high precision, and no cross-reactivity with non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogens were observed for RT-SARS and AlinSARS. AlinSARS detected SARS-CoV-2 in spiked throat washes and in specimens infected with SARS-CoV-2 Alpha or Beta variants. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed RT-SARS, AlinSARS, and Alin4Plex assays proved to be useful for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , RNA Viral/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
J Clin Virol ; 129: 104514, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32688328

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accurate molecular methods to detect and quantify hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA are essential to diagnose chronic infections, guide treatment decisions, assess response to treatment, and determine risk of HBV-related complications. New generations of real-time HBV DNA assay platforms provide results in less than 2-3 h, with continuous loading of specimens and true random-access capability. OBJECTIVES: We examined the clinical performance of the new Alinity m HBV assay, run on the fully automated, continuous, random-access Alinity m platform, to accurately detect and quantify HBV DNA in a large series of patient samples infected with different HBV genotypes frequently encountered in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: This international, multisite study assessed the precision and reproducibility of the Alinity m HBV assay and compared its performance to four HBV assays currently in clinical use. RESULTS: The Alinity m HBV assay demonstrated linear quantitation of HBV DNA in plasma samples, with high precision (coefficient of variation 4.1 %-8.8 %) and reproducibility. The Alinity m HBV assay showed excellent correlation (correlation coefficients ≥0.947) with comparator HBV assays, with an overall observed bias ranging from -0.07 to 0.17 Log10 IU/mL. 97 % of quantifiable patient results were <1 Log10 IU/mL different than the respective comparator assays, with comparable results across HBV genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed real-time PCR-based Alinity m HBV assay is sensitive, reproducible, and accurately quantifies HBV DNA levels from HBsAg-positive patients across the full dynamic range of quantification.


Assuntos
Vírus da Hepatite B , Hepatite B , DNA Viral , Vírus da Hepatite B/genética , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Carga Viral
4.
J Clin Virol ; 129: 104531, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32688330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid testing is essential for the detection and quantification of HCV RNA in the diagnosis of HCV infection and treatment monitoring. The Alinity m HCV assay was recently developed by Abbott Molecular for rapid detection and quantification of HCV RNA on the fully automated, continuous, random-access Alinity m analyzer. OBJECTIVES: Our study assessed the performance of the new Alinity m HCV assay for detection and quantification of HCV RNA in a large series of patient samples of various genotypes. This international, multicentric study evaluated the linearity, precision, and reproducibility of the Alinity m HCV assay and its performance in comparison to three other HCV assays currently used in clinical practice. RESULTS: The Alinity m HCV assay demonstrated high linearity (correlation coefficient r = 1.00), precision (coefficients of variation [CV] 6.6-13.5 %) and reproducibility (CV 1.7-4.3 % across three control lots). At a concentration near the lower limit of detection, the Alinity m HCV assay exhibited >98 % detectability. The Alinity m HCV assay showed excellent correlation with comparator HCV assays in serum (n = 406) and plasma (n = 1401) samples (correlation coefficients ≥0.96, bias 0.01 to 0.14 Log10 IU/mL). More than 95 % of the quantified results with the Alinity m HCV assay were less than mean bias ± 1.96 SD different from those of the comparator assays. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed Alinity m HCV assay is sensitive, reproducible, and accurately quantifies HCV RNA levels in serum and plasma samples from patients with chronic HCV infection, with no impact of HCV genotype on assay performance.


Assuntos
Hepacivirus , Hepatite C , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , RNA Viral , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Carga Viral
5.
J Clin Virol ; 129: 104530, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32688329

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid detection of HIV-1 RNA is critical for early diagnosis, treatment decision making, and long-term management of HIV-1 infection. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Alinity m HIV-1 assay, which uses a dual target/dual probe design against highly conserved target regions of the HIV-1 genome and is run on the fully automated Alinity m platform. STUDY DESIGN: This was an international, multisite study that compared the diagnostic performance of the Alinity m HIV-1 assay to four commercially available HIV-1 assays routinely used in nine independent clinical laboratories. Alinity m HIV-1 assay precision, detectability, and reproducibility was compared across four study sites. RESULTS: The Alinity m HIV-1 assay produced comparable results to currently available HIV-1 assays (correlation coefficient >0.995), with an overall bias of -0.1 to 0.10 Log10 copies/mL. The Alinity m HIV-1 assay and its predecessor m2000 HIV-1 assay demonstrated comparable detection of 16 different HIV-1 subtypes (R2 = 0.956). A high level of agreement (>88 %) between all HIV-1 assays was seen near clinical decision points of 1.7 Log10 copies/mL (50 copies/mL) and 2.0 Log10 copies/mL (200 copies/mL). Alinity m HIV-1 assay precision was 0.08 and 0.21 Log10 copies/mL at VLs of 1000 and 50 copies/mL, respectively, with a high level of detectability (≥97 % hit rate) and reproducibility across sites. CONCLUSIONS: The Alinity m HIV-1 assay provides comparable diagnostic accuracy to current HIV-1 assays, and when run on the Alinity m system, has the capacity to shorten the time between diagnosis and treatment.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , HIV-1/genética , Humanos , RNA Viral , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Carga Viral
6.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 14: 183, 2014 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25326034

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite strong recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, participation rates are low. Understanding factors that affect screening choices is essential to developing future screening strategies. Therefore, this study assessed patient willingness to use non-invasive stool or blood based screening tests after refusing colonoscopy. METHODS: Participants were recruited during regular consultations. Demographic, health, psychological and socioeconomic factors were recorded. All subjects were advised to undergo screening by colonoscopy. Subjects who refused colonoscopy were offered a choice of non-invasive tests. Subjects who selected stool testing received a collection kit and instructions; subjects who selected plasma testing had a blood draw during the office visit. Stool samples were tested with the Hb/Hp Complex Elisa test, and blood samples were tested with the Epi proColon® 2.0 test. Patients who were positive for either were advised to have a diagnostic colonoscopy. RESULTS: 63 of 172 subjects were compliant to screening colonoscopy (37%). 106 of the 109 subjects who refused colonoscopy accepted an alternative non-invasive method (97%). 90 selected the Septin9 blood test (83%), 16 selected a stool test (15%) and 3 refused any test (3%). Reasons for blood test preference included convenience of an office draw, overall convenience and less time consuming procedure. CONCLUSIONS: 97% of subjects refusing colonoscopy accepted a non-invasive screening test of which 83% chose the Septin9 blood test. The observation that participation can be increased by offering non-invasive tests, and that a blood test is the preferred option should be validated in a prospective trial in the screening setting.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Testes Hematológicos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Sangue Oculto , Cooperação do Paciente , Idoso , Colonoscopia , DNA/sangue , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
7.
Biomark Insights ; 9: 9-13, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24812481

RESUMO

Despite efforts to standardize molecular diagnostic tests, performance differences are not rare. Laboratories are challenged in situations where treatment rules have been established using a reference assay that is different from the assays being used in daily practice. Assessing the viral load status of patients with chronic hepatitis C under modern triple therapy is a recognized example. We demonstrate the use of the range of uncertainty as an easy and efficient tool that can provide information on the certainty of a test result's interpretation in the context of making hepatitis C virus treatment decisions.

8.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 47(7): 834-41, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19496736

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measurement of C-peptide under standardized conditions provides a sensitive and well-established assessment of beta-cell function. We describe the analytical and clinical validation of an automated, microparticle-based chemiluminescent immunoassay method. The assay is designed to measure C-peptide in human serum, plasma and urine. METHODS: Assay performance characteristics such as precision and recovery were measured according to protocols established by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). A reference range study was conducted. Analytical sensitivity and specificity, interfering substances, recovery, and linearity studies were performed. Method comparison, against the ADVIA Centaur C-Peptide assay (Siemens), was evaluated with clinical specimens from patients with abnormal insulin secretion. RESULTS: The detection limit for this assay was 0.01 ng/mL. Functional sensitivity (inter-assay imprecision < or = 20%) was 0.015 ng/mL at a coefficient of variation (%CV) of 11.2%. Total imprecision was below 6.5% CV. The assay was linear upon dilution. Comparison with the ADVIA Centaur C-Peptide assay yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The ARCHITECT C-Peptide assay measures C-peptide rapidly, accurately, and precisely in human serum, plasma and urine. It provides useful improvements for beta-cell function testing and for evaluating the clinical status of a patient in combination with other diabetes markers.


Assuntos
Peptídeo C/análise , Transtornos do Metabolismo de Glucose/diagnóstico , Imunoensaio/métodos , Peptídeo C/sangue , Peptídeo C/urina , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Medições Luminescentes , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
9.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 62(3): 235-44, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18715735

RESUMO

The ARCHITECT Toxo IgG and IgG Avidity assays have been developed as a fully automated panel for immune status determination and acute infection exclusion. Resolved relative specificity and sensitivity of the ARCHITECT Toxo IgG assay were 99.6% (1359/1365) and 99.7% (1096/1099) as determined on pregnant females, blood donor, and diagnostic specimens. Seroconversion sensitivity of the ARCHITECT assay was comparable with the AxSYM Toxo IgG assay. The ARCHITECT Toxo IgG Avidity assay detected 100.0% (124/124) of acute phase specimens (<4 months after infection) as low avidity, whereas the Vidas Toxo IgG Avidity assay detected 98.9% (89/90) as low avidity. In summary, the ARCHITECT Toxo IgG assay, using recombinant antigens, showed excellent specificity and sensitivity for acute phase as well as past infection specimens. The ARCHITECT Toxoplasmosis panel can be reliably used to rule out acute Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Afinidade de Anticorpos , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Toxoplasma/imunologia , Toxoplasmose/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Animais , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/imunologia , Gravidez , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/parasitologia , Proteínas Recombinantes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Toxoplasma/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...