Topical ABT-263 treatment reduces aged skin senescence and improves subsequent wound healing.

Senescent cells (SnC) accumulate in aging tissues, impairing their ability to undergo repair and regeneration following injury. Previous research has demonstrated that targeting tissue senescence with senolytics can enhance tissue regeneration and repair by selectively eliminating SnCs in specific aged tissues. In this study, we focused on eliminating SnC skin cells in aged mice to assess the effects on subsequent wound healing. We applied ABT-263 directly to the skin of 24-month-old mice over a 5-day period. Following topical ABT-263, aged skin demonstrated decreased gene expression of senescent markers p16 and p21, accompanied by reductions in SA-ß-gal and p21-positive cells compared to DMSO controls. However, ABT-263 also triggered a temporary inflammatory response and macrophage infiltration in the skin. Bulk RNA sequencing of ABT-263-treated skin revealed prompt upregulation of genes associated with wound healing pathways, including hemostasis, inflammation, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, collagen synthesis, and extracellular matrix organization. Aged mice skin pre-treated with topical ABT-263 exhibited accelerated wound closure. In conclusion, topical ABT-263 effectively reduced several senescence markers in aged skin, thereby priming the skin for improved subsequent wound healing. This enhancement may be attributed to ABT-263-induced senolysis which in turn stimulates the expression of genes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling and wound repair pathways.

Molecular Basis of Surgical Coaptation Techniques in Peripheral Nerve Injuries.

Peripheral nerve injuries requiring surgical repair affect over 100,000 individuals in the US annually. Three accepted methods of peripheral repair include end-to-end, end-to-side, and side-to-side neurorrhaphy, each with its own set of indications. While it remains important to understand the specific circumstances in which each method is employed, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the repair can add to the surgeon's decision-making algorithm when considering each technique, as well as help decide nuances in technique such as the need for making epineurial versus perineurial windows, length and dept of the nerve window, and distance from target muscle. In addition, a thorough knowledge of individual factors that are active in a particular repair can help guide research into adjunct therapies. This paper serves to summarize the similarities and divergences of the three commonly used nerve repair strategies and the scope of molecular mechanisms and signal transduction pathways in nerve regeneration as well as to identify the gaps in knowledge that should be addressed if we are to improve clinical outcomes in our patients.