Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 20(1): 108-112, 2019 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31058622

RESUMO

AIM: To establish an effective combination of drying time and drying method of the tray adhesive so that maximum bond strength can be achieved between impression tray and impression material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindrical specimens of auto-polymerizing resin and addition silicone impression material were made. A total of 150 specimens were tested. They were divided into two groups Dentsply and GC. Each group was further divided into five subgroups: • Drying with compressed air for half the time as recommended by the manufacturer • Drying with air blower for half the time as recommended by the manufacturer • Open air drying as recommended by the manufacturer • Open air drying for 15 minutes • Open air drying for 1 hour The samples were tested for tensile bond strength using the universal testing machine. The results were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULT: Open air drying as recommended by the manufacturer was better than drying with a blower or compressed air. There was no significant difference between open-air drying for 5 minutes and open-air drying for 15 minutes or 1 hour. CONCLUSION: Open air drying as recommended by the manufacturer, i.e. 5min, showed good bond strength and drying for more than 5mins does not significantly increase bond strength. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Tray adhesive should not be dried with compressed air or air blower. Tray adhesive should be applied and kept to dry according to the manufacturer's recommended time.


Assuntos
Colagem Dentária , Adesivos , Cimentos Dentários , Teste de Materiais , Polivinil , Siloxanas , Resistência à Tração
2.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 11(4): ZC101-ZC104, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28571274

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Acrylic resins have been used extensively for the fabrication of denture bases because of their aesthetic qualities, ease of manipulation and repairability. Flexural fatigue of the denture base has been shown to be a factor in the clinical failure of polymethyl methacrylate resin dentures. Also, the fracture can result from impact, fatigue or degradation of the base material. Hence, there is a need to increase the strength of denture base resins. AIM: To evaluate the effect of reinforcing alumina oxide filler on the flexural strength of different acrylic resins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 acrylic specimens were fabricated, which were divided into three groups self cure acrylic resin (SC), conventional heat cure resin (HC) and high strength heat cure resin (HI). Each group was divided into four subgroups i.e., control group and the specimens of the remaining three groups were reinforced with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) powder by 5%, 10% and 15% by weight. Specimens were stored in distilled water for one week; flexural strength was tested by universal testing machine. Results were analysed by one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey paired group comparison tests. RESULTS: Flexural strength of SC increased by 9%, 13% and 19%, Flexural strength of HC increased by 8%, 15% and 19% and that of HI increased by 21%, 26% and 29% compared to control group by adding 5%,10% and 15% of alumina filler (p-value <0.001). Addition of 15% of alumina powder to SC showed high flexure strength compared to control group of HC (p-value <0.001). Addition of 10% and 15% of alumina powder to HC showed high flexural strength compared to control group of HI (p-value <0.001). CONCLUSION: Addition of alumina to self cure acrylic resin, conventional heat cure acrylic resin and high strength heat cure acrylic resin increased the flexural strength. Increasing the flexural strength of the acrylic resin base material could lead to more clinical success.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...