A Retrospective Analysis of Dynamic Compression Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing for the Management of Shaft of Humerus Fractures in an Urban Trauma Care Center.

Introduction There is constant debate regarding the best surgical technique for the fixation of shaft humerus fractures. Intramedullary nailing and dynamic compression plating are the most popular surgical options. Materials and methods In our study, we retrospectively analyze the results of 27 patients with shaft humerus fractures managed with intramedullary nailing (10) and dynamic compression plating (17) at our institute from September 2021 to October 2022. Preoperative clinical assessment sheets, postoperative follow-up sheets, operative notes, anesthesia sheets, and preoperative and follow-up radiographs were analyzed. Reamed antegrade nailing was done in all cases, while dynamic compression plating was done through a posterior approach. Results The operative time of the nailing group was 82.1 ± 7.61 mins, which was significantly lesser (P value <0.05) than that of the plating group, which was 119.59 ± 10.16 mins. The intraoperative blood loss of the patients who were managed with nailing was 71 ± 7.38 mL, which was significantly lesser (P value <0.05) than that of the plating group, which was 130.59 ± 11.44 mL. The patients in both groups had a statistically nonsignificant difference in terms of functional results, which were assessed using Rodriguez-Merchan criteria. Complications were similar in both groups with infection (17.65%), and postoperative radial nerve palsy (11.76%) was more common among the patients undergoing plating, and shoulder impingement(20%) was common among those undergoing nailing. Conclusion This study concluded that both surgical options are similar in the case of functional results. The selection of the surgical method should be as per the surgeon's surgical familiarity and personalized to individual patients.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Has Better Long-Term Results Than Corticosteroids or Placebo for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Randomized Control Trial.

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a supersaturated concentration of autologous platelets that augments the natural healing response of fascia. Previous studies have shown the superiority of PRP over corticosteroids (CS) for chronic plantar fasciitis. The aim of this study was to compare the pain and functional outcomes of PRP with CS and placebo injections for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. We conducted a 3-arm randomized controlled trial of 90 patients: PRP (n = 30 patients), CS (n = 30 patients), and placebo (n = 30 patients). The patients were followed at regular intervals until 18 months postinjection using validated instruments. The mean visual analog scale score showed significant improvement in all groups between baseline and 18-month follow-up (PRP: 8.2 vs 2.1; CS: 8.8 vs 3.6; placebo: 8.1 vs 5.4), with CS showing significantly better improvement than PRP in the short term, whereas longer-term PRP was significantly better than CS. The mean Roles and Maudley score showed significant improvement in all groups between baseline and 18-month follow-up (PRP: 1.7 vs 3.7; CS: 1.2 vs 3.1; placebo: 1.2 vs 2.0), with CS showing significantly better improvement than PRP in the short term, whereas longer-term PRP was significantly better than CS. The mean Short Form 12 score showed significant improvement in all groups between baseline and 18-month follow-up (PRP: 55.4 vs 80.2; CS: 56.2 vs 76.2; placebo: 54.1 vs 62.4). We found that all 3 groups showed significant improvement between baseline and end of the follow-up period with regard to pain, function, and general health. The CS arm showed better improvement in the short term, whereas the PRP arm showed better results in the long term. In contrast to previous studies, we found no significant drop-off effect of CS in the long term, which may be owing to background natural healing process of the disease. In summary, both PRP and CS are safe and effective treatment options for chronic plantar fasciitis, showing superior results to placebo treatment. The longer-term results and less reinjection and/or surgery rate of PRP makes it more attractive as an injection treatment option versus CS injection.

Optimal parameters to avoid thermal necrosis during bone drilling: A finite element analysis.

The drilling bone may potentially cause excessive frictional heat, which can lead to local bone necrosis. This heat generation and local necrosis has been suggested to contribute to the resorption of bone around the placed screws, ending in loss of screw purchase in the bone and inadvertent loosening and/or the bone-implant construct. In vivo studies on this subject have inherent obstacles not the least of which is controlling the variables and real time bone temperature data acquisition. Theoretical models can be generated using computer software and the inclusion of known constants for the mechanical properties of metal and bone. These known Data points for the variables (drill bit and bone) enables finite element analysis of various bone drilling scenarios. An elastic-plastic three-dimensional (3D) acetabular bone mode was developed and finite element model analysis (FEA) was applied to various simulated drilling procedures. The FEA results clearly indicate that the depth of drilling and the drill speed both have a significant effect on the temperature during drilling procedures. The reduction of the feeding speed leads to a reduction in bone temperature. Our data suggests that reducing the feeding speed regardless of RPMs and pressure applied could be a simple useful and effective way to reduce drilling temperatures. This study is the first step in helping any surgeon who drills bone and places screws to better understand the ideal pressure to apply and drill speed to employ and advance rate to avoid osteonecrosis. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2386-2391, 2017.