RESUMO
A non-invasive method to estimate cardiac output (CO) in mechanically ventilated patients, based on prolonged expiration, has been previously described. With the aim to assess its performances, we prospectively enrolled fifteen cardiac surgery patients, and compared the results obtained with the non-invasive method with the ones obtained using two invasive approaches based on thermodilution. The correlations between the prolonged expiration method with both the thermodilution-based ones show high values (ρ(2)>0.77 and ρ(2)>0.89). This encouraging agreement is also confirmed by the closeness between the measured values of CO: the mean differences considering all patients and the two reference invasive techniques are -0.8 % and -7.5 %. These values show the slight underestimation of CO by the proposed non-invasive method with respect to the gold standard. On the other hand the described method could represent a good compromise between accuracy and non-invasiveness, which fosters the implementation of a new monitoring tool suitable for a semi-continuous CO assessment.