Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Ann Ig ; 26(3): 195-204, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24998210

RESUMO

AIM: Aim of this study was to validate the Comprehensive Appropriateness Scale for the Care of Obesity in Rehabilitation (CASCO-R) and to determine the cut-off score for indicating the most appropriate health care setting for patients with obesity. METHODS: The CASCO-R scale was developed according to the available scientific literature and expertise of an expert panel working for a Consensus document endorsed by the Italian Society of Obesity (SIO) and the Italian Society for the Study of Eating Disorders (SISDCA). 16 Italian centres, specialized in the treatment of obesity, characterised by different settings of care (specialist outpatient service, day-hospital service, intensive inpatient rehabilitation), participated in the study. RESULTS: 449 obese subjects were enrolled in the study (30.5% males and 69.5% females): 38.3% from outpatient services, 20.7% from day-hospital services and 40.9% from intensive inpatient rehabilitation units. After 2-month of treatment, a workload summary sheet, including medical and nursing interventions, number of expert advices and diagnostic procedures, and adverse clinical events (ACEs) was fulfilled for each patient. Statistically significant correlation was found between the CASCO-R scale score, overall workload and ACEs. The CASCO-R scale demonstrated also an excellent performance in terms of internal validity and test-retest analysis. Three total score cut-off have been proposed: >25 for inpatient intensive rehabilitation; 20-25 for day-hospital service; <20 for outpatient treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the CASCO-R scale was demonstrated to be a valid tool for assessing the appropriateness of the choice of the level of care. Hence, it can be used to verify the proper allocation of patients, as it was well correlated with measures of workload and the incidence of ACEs.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/normas , Obesidade Mórbida/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Eat Weight Disord ; 15(1-2 Suppl): 1-31, 2010.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20975326

RESUMO

This paper is an Italian Expert Consensus Document on multidimensional treatment of obesity and eating disorders. The Document is based on a wide survey of expert opinion. It presents, in particular, considerations regarding how clinicians go about choosing the most appropriate site of treatment for a given patient suffering from obesity and/or eating disorders: outpatient, partial hospitalization, residential rehabilitation centre, inpatient hospitalization. In a majority of instances obesity and eating disorders are long-term diseases and require a multiprofessional team-approach. In determining an initial level of care or a change to a different level of care, it is essential to consider together the overall physical condition, medical complications, disabilities, psychiatric comorbidity, psychology, behaviour, family, social resources, environment, and available services. We first created a review manuscript, a skeleton algorithm and two rating scales, based on the published guidelines and the existing research literature. As the second point we highlighted a number of clinical questions that had to be addressed in the specific context of our National Health Service and available specialized care units. Then we submitted eleven progressive revisions of the Document to the experts up to the final synthesis that was approved by the group. Of course, from point to point, some of the individual experts would differ with the consensus view. The document can be viewed as an expert consultation and the clinical judgement must always be tailored to the particular needs of each clinical situation. We will continue to revise the Document periodically based on new research information and on reassessment of expert opinion to keep it up-to-date. The Document was not financially sponsored.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Prova Pericial , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/terapia , Hospitalização , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Obesidade/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Tratamento Domiciliar , Algoritmos , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnóstico , Anorexia Nervosa/terapia , Transtorno da Compulsão Alimentar/diagnóstico , Transtorno da Compulsão Alimentar/terapia , Bulimia Nervosa/diagnóstico , Bulimia Nervosa/terapia , Comorbidade , Consenso , Hospital Dia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/psicologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/reabilitação , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Itália , Atividade Motora , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Estado Nutricional , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Obesidade/psicologia , Obesidade/reabilitação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tratamento Domiciliar/normas , Fatores de Risco , Meio Social , Caminhada
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...