RESUMO
Background: Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are osteolytic, non-malignant, vascular lesions of the bone. Pathological fractures can be a manifestation of the ABCs, which occur in about 8% of ABCs. Different treatments have been described in the literature, but, nowadays, an optimal management of the pathological fractures in patients with ABCs is still a matter of debate and there are no standard guidelines for treatment nor any shared indication about the best surgical intervention. The aim of our study is to review the current literature available on this matter exploring and confronting different surgical treatments for pathological fractures in ABC in order to clarify the surgical approach to these patients. Methods: A systematic review of the literature indexed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases was carried out. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematically Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were followed. Results: A total of 37 articles were relevant and were finally included in the study. In total, we reached a population of 140 patients. Of the 140 patients included in the review, 124 patients (88.6%) underwent curettage surgery, 15 patients (10.7%) underwent en bloc resection surgery. A total of 47% of patients (70) underwent synthesis surgery with a plate, screw, nail, or external fixator. Adjuvant treatments were used in 8.6% of patients (12). Complications involved 20.7% of the patients (29). Conclusions: In conclusion, the treatment of pathological fractures in aneurysmal bone cysts requires careful patient assessment, considering factors such as age, the presence of open growth plates, the location of the lesion, and the surgeon's expertise.
RESUMO
(1) Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) significantly impacts patients' quality of life and negatively affects public healthcare costs. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) in OA treatment across different anatomical districts, determining pain reduction and overall improvement in the patient's quality of life. (2) Methods: In this systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials involving patients with osteoarthritis undergoing PEMF therapy. Seventeen studies (1197 patients) were included. (3) Results: PEMF therapy demonstrated positive outcomes across various anatomical districts, primarily in knee osteoarthritis. Pain reduction, assessed through VAS and WOMAC scores, showed significant improvement (60% decrease in VAS, 42% improvement in WOMAC). The treatment duration varied (15 to 90 days), with diverse PEMF devices used. Secondary outcomes included improvements in quality of life, reduced medication usage, and enhanced physical function. (4) Conclusions: Diverse PEMF applications revealed promising results, emphasizing pain reduction and improvement in the quality of life of patients. The variability in the treatment duration and device types calls for further investigation. This review informs future research directions and potential advancements in optimizing PEMF therapies for diverse osteoarthritic manifestations.
