Influence of sternal size and inadvertent paramedian sternotomy on stability of the closure site: a clinical and mechanical study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of sternal size and of inadvertent paramedian sternotomy on stability of the closure site is not well defined. METHODS: Data on 171 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery through a midline sternotomy were prospectively collected. Intraoperative measurements of sternal dimension included thickness and width at the manubrium, the third and fifth intercostal spaces; paramedian sternotomy was defined as width of one side of the sternum equaling 75% or more of the entire width, at any of the three levels. The chest was closed with simple peristernal steel wires and inspected to detect deep wound infection and/or instability for 3 postoperative months. The sternal factors and several patient/surgery-related factors were included in a multivariate analysis model to identify factors affecting stability. An electromechanical traction test was conducted on 6 rewired sternal models after midline or paramedian sternotomy and separation data were analyzed. RESULTS: Chest instability was detected in 12 (7%) patients and wound infection in 2 (1.2%). Patient weight (P = .03), depressed left ventricular function (P = .04), sternum thickness (indexed to body weight, P = .03), and paramedian sternotomy (P = .0001) were risk factors of postoperative instability; paramedian sternotomy was the only independent predictor (P = .001). The electromechanical test showed more lateral displacement of the two rewired sternal halves after paramedian than midline sternotomy (P = .002); accordingly, load at fracture point was lower after paramedian sternotomy (220 +/- 20 N vs 545 +/- 25 N, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inadvertent paramedian sternomoty strongly affects postoperative chest wound stability independently from sternal size, requiring prompt reinforcement of chest closure.

Liver transplantation with vena cava in situ and selective use of temporary portacaval shunt or portal clamping.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recipient hepatectomy with vena cava in situ in liver transplantation has overcome the need of venous-venous bypass thanks to temporary porta caval shunt or portal clamping. METHODOLOGY: 150 orthotopic liver transplants in 137 patients were performed and the vena cava in situ technique was used in 142 (venous bypass in 7, temporary porta caval shunt in 49, portal clamping in 87). The suprahepatic cava veins anastomosis was performed with Belghiti in 97 and piggyback techniques in 45. RESULTS: There were no differences in operative and warm ischemia times nor in blood requirements, while a greater stability of body temperature was documented in the vena cava In Situ group: in the latter temporary porta caval shunt preserved the temperature better than portal clamping (P < 0.01). In anhepatic phase mean artery pressure decreased in veno-venous bypass and increased in the vena cava In situ groups (P < 0.01). The venous return and the cardiac performances (anhepatic phase) were better preserved in the vena cava In Situ group. (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary portal caval shunt or portal clamping and piggyback or Belgiti Techniques allow a better hemodynamic stability through out the procedure, obviating the need for veno-venous bypass or fluid overload, if selectively used.

Laparoscopic surgery after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Laparoscopic surgery is currently a widely accepted approach to several surgical fields because of its advantages in terms of postoperative pain reduction and easy patient recovery. This approach may be useful even in solid-organ transplantation surgery as a diagnostic or treatment procedure in some surgical complications. From July 1991 to December 1998, we performed 142 liver transplantations on 129 patients. During the postoperative period, many complications occurred. Here we report two cases of intestinal occlusion caused by adhesions and three cases of lymphocele, all approached with laparoscopic surgery. In all cases but one, we were able to complete the surgery by laparoscopic means; in one of the two occlusions, the procedure was switched to laparotomy because of a choledochojejunal anastomosis lesion. The three cases of lymphocele must be considered in a particular manner because such cases, to our knowledge, have never been described in the literature. They always presented with a late-onset right pleural effusion and were located in the retrohepatic, retrogastric, and left paracaval areas, close to the esophageal hiatus. In conclusion, we believe a laparoscopic approach is a useful strategy to solve some surgical complications in patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation; however, the use of laparoscopic surgery in this field is strictly connected to the surgeon's experience and versatility.