Severe and moderate haemophilia A and B in US females.

Haemophilia A and B are rare X-lined hemorrhagic disorders that typically affect men. Women are usually asymptomatic carriers, but may be symptomatic and, rarely, also express severe (factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) <0.01 U mL(-1)) or moderately severe (FVIII/FIX 0.01-0.05 U mL(-1)) phenotypes. However, data on clinical manifestations, genotype and the psychosocial ramifications of illness in severely affected females remain anecdotal. A national multi-centre retrospective study was conducted to collect a comprehensive data set on affected US girls and women, and to compare clinical observations to previously published information on haemophilic males of comparable severity and mildly affected haemophilic females. Twenty-two severe/moderate haemophilia A/B subjects were characterized with respect to clinical manifestations and disease complications; genetic determinants of phenotypic severity; and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Clinical data were compared as previously indicated. Female patients were older than male patients at diagnosis, but similarly experienced joint haemorrhage, disease- and treatment-related complications and access to treatment. Gynaecological and obstetrical bleeding was unexpectedly infrequent. F8 or F9 mutations, accompanied by extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation pattern (XIP), were primary determinants of severity. HR-QoL was diminished by arthropathy and viral infection. Using systematic case verification of participants in a national surveillance registry, this study elucidated the genetics, clinical phenotype and quality of life issues in female patients with severe/moderate haemophilia. An ongoing international case-controlled study will further evaluate these observations. Novel mechanistic questions are raised about the relationship between XIP and both age and tissue-specific FVIII and FIX expression.

Immune tolerance induction in haemophilia: evidence and the way forward.

Given the inhibitor-associated morbidity resulting from limited effective treatment options, antibody eradication is the ultimate goal of inhibitor management. The only clinically proven strategy for achieving antigen-specific tolerance to factor VIII is immune tolerance induction (ITI). First reported over 30 years ago, much of our current knowledge about ITI in haemophilia A and B was derived from small cohort studies and retrospective national and international ITI registries. More recently, prospective randomised ITI trials have been designed and initiated to answer outstanding questions related to the optimisation of current therapeutic strategy in haemophilia A. However, due to the low incidence of inhibitor development in haemophilia B compared to haemophilia A, there are few comparable data from which to develop a useful evidence-based approach to the prevention and eradication of FIX inhibitors. The lack of an effective strategy is particularly problematic given the even greater morbidity associated with the almost unique occurrence of allergic and anaphylactic reactions that often herald FIX antibody development, and further complicates attempts to eradicate FIX inhibitors. Ultimately, successful inhibitor prevention and eradication strategies for both diseases will emerge from the clinical translation of our evolving knowledge of immune stimulation and tolerance. This paper will discuss our current understanding of immune tolerance outcome and outcome predictors for haemophilia A and B; it will also review the current consensus recommendations for ITI, as well as the emerging scientific body of immunological knowledge that may significantly impact the therapeutic and preventative strategies of the future.

Mutations in the fibrinogen aalpha gene account for the majority of cases of congenital afibrinogenemia.

Congenital afibrinogenemia is a rare, autosomal, recessive disorder characterized by the complete absence of detectable fibrinogen. We previously identified the first causative mutations in a nonconsanguineous Swiss family; the 4 affected persons have homozygous deletions of approximately 11 kb of the fibrinogen alpha (FGA) gene. Haplotype data implied that these deletions occurred on distinct ancestral chromosomes, suggesting that this region may be susceptible to deletion by a common mechanism. We subsequently showed that all the deletions were identical to the base pair and probably resulted from a nonhomologous recombination mediated by 7-bp direct repeats. In this study, we have collected data on 13 additional unrelated patients to identify the causative mutations and to determine the prevalence of the 11-kb deletion. A common recurrent mutation, at the donor splice site of FGA intron 4 (IVS4 + 1 G > T), accounted for 14 of the 26 (54%) alleles. One patient was heterozygous for the previously identified deletion. Three more frameshift mutations, 2 nonsense mutations, and a second splice site mutation were also identified. Consequently, 86% of afibrinogenemia alleles analyzed to date have truncating mutations of FGA, though mutations in all 3 fibrinogen genes, FGG, FGA, and FGB, might be predicted to cause congenital afibrinogenemia.

Immune tolerance: a synopsis of the international experience.

Because of the increased morbidity and cost of care associated with inhibitor development, immune tolerance therapy (ITT) is of crucial value in the care of haemophilia. The 24-year experience with this modality, primarily in the treatment of factor VIII inhibitors, has included the use of both high and low doses of clotting factor, with and without immune modulation. Overall success rates for ITT in haemophilia A have been similar (63-83%), while median time to IT has been variable (1.2-24 months). The role of type and purity of clotting factor used remains unclear. Three immune tolerance registries have suggested the potential importance of treatment parameters such as pre-induction inhibitor titer and daily factor dose in the prediction of successful outcome. Ultimately, prospective randomized studies of ITT are required to definitively compare therapeutic regimens with respect to efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness.