Return to sport activities after medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus transfer.

PURPOSE: Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy with flexor digitorum longus transfer is a common treatment for the management of the adult flatfoot associated with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. In the literature, there is a paucity of information regarding the ability of patients to return to sport and recreational activities after this surgical procedure. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the rate and type of athletic activities that patients participated in before and after medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy with flexor digitorum longus transfer. METHODS: A consecutive series of 42 patients with a mean age at surgery of 41 years (range 19-74 years) was evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 24 months (range 18-31 months). Pre- and post-operative sporting activities were assessed. At final follow-up, patients were asked to complete a Sports Athlete Foot and Ankle Score (SAFAS). Each patient was also evaluated with weight-bearing radiographs of the foot before surgery and at final follow-up. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 27 of 42 (64.3 %) patients were engaged in athletic activities, participating in an average of 1.4 h/week (range 0-6 h/week); post-operatively, 36/42 (85.7 %) participated in sport and recreational activities for an average of 3.5 h/week (range 0-15 h/week). Meary's angle improved significantly from 11.5 ± 6.2 degrees preoperatively to 7.0 ± 5.7 degrees at final follow-up (p < 0.01); calcaneal pitch improved significantly from 16.5 ± 4.6 degrees to 19.0 ± 5.0 degrees (p < 0.01). At final follow-up, patients demonstrated good SAFASs in symptom tolerance (86.4 %), pain tolerance (89.0 %), daily living performance (96.1 %), and sports performance (86.7 %). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients returned to sports and recreational activity after medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus for the treatment of adult flatfoot associated with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Outcomes of the calcaneo-stop procedure for the treatment of juvenile flatfoot in young athletes.

PURPOSE: Flexible flatfoot (FFF) is a widespread condition in juvenile patients. If symptomatic, FFF can require surgical treatment. The calcaneo-stop procedure has shown excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes and low rates of complications. The aim of the present study was to assess the sport practice of young athletes affected by FFF having undergone the calcaneo-stop procedure. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, 68 sport practitioners were bilaterally treated by the calcaneo-stop procedure, for a total of 136 FFF cases. Clinical evaluation, including the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), the Yoo et al score and The Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and FADI Sport scores were assessed. Radiographic evaluation was based on measurement of talar declination, Costa-Bertani's angle and calcaneal pitch. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 57.6 months (sd 16.8). The AOFAS score mean increased from 79.3 (sd 5.7) to 97.3 (sd 4.5) three years after surgery. The Yoo score improved from 3.1 (sd 1.0) preoperatively to 11.7 (sd 0.6) three years after surgery. The FADI Sport subscale mean improved from 74.1 (sd 10.4) preoperatively to 95.9 (sd 4.9) three years after surgery.Costa-Bertani's angle decreased from 156.1° (sd 4.2°) to 135.8° (sd 7.3°) at three years postoperatively; mean talar declination angle decreased from 44.2° (sd 6.3°) to 30.6° (sd 3.2°) at three years postoperatively and mean calcaneal pitch increased from 12.6° (sd 2.3°) to 16.3° (sd 1.3°) at three years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Adolescent patients who underwent the calcaneo-stop procedure reported satisfactory outcomes in terms of clinical and radiological evaluations. Moreover, our results showed an improvement of sport activity levels, with patients recovering sports activity within three months of surgery and without limitation in the execution of preferred activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.