Challenge of concomitant thymoma resection and myocardial revascularization: A Case Report.

Myocardial revascularization in patients presenting with an anterior mediastinal mass poses considerable challenges. In this report, we outline two cases involving patients with anterior mediastinal masses who underwent surgical resection alongside concurrent myocardial revascularization. One patient underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, while the other was treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent placement. Both patients fully recovered from the relative procedures and were discharged within two weeks post-surgery, ultimately diagnosed with thymoma. The concomitant intervention offered the advantage of promptly addressing both conditions, and it was performed safely through a collaborative multidisciplinary effort.

Asymptomatic giant ascending aortic aneurysm: a challenging surgical strategy for a silent bicuspid aortopathy.

We report the case of an incidental finding of a huge aneurysm of the ascending aorta with a congenital bicuspid aortic valve type 0-lateral. This severe condition was totally unknown to the patient, who was asymptomatic for cardiovascular disease. The aneurysmal mass involved the entire mediastinum, altering the normal anatomical relations, so the operative strategy was modified intraoperatively, tailoring the surgical technique to the anatomical conditions found. Despite a delayed awakening, the patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course. Therefore, this case highlights the importance of not underestimating nonspecific, seemingly harmless symptoms and signs that may reveal potentially catastrophic pathologies, while also focusing on the surgical technique used. The modified Cabrol procedure, while an underutilized technique, if present in the cardiac surgeon's "arsenal," can represent a life-saving strategy in complex cases requiring an aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement.

Endovascular Surgery of Descending Thoracic Aorta Involved in T4 Lung Tumor.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of primary lung T4 tumors is controversial especially when the cancer invades the mediastinal structures or the descending thoracic aorta. Conventional surgical treatment is associated with a high perioperative mortality and morbidity rate. Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair has emerged as a valid off-label alternative to conventional surgery. We aimed to assess perioperative and midterm aortic-related outcome of patients who have undergone aortic stent-graft implantation, followed by en bloc surgical treatment of the involved aorta and lung cancer resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2017 to May 2020, we treated 5 patients diagnosed with a T4 lung cancer by the involvement of the descending thoracic aorta. When only the descending thoracic aorta is involved, a 2-stage procedure was considered, with aortic stent-graft implantation performed before tumor resection. One-stage strategy, with stent-graft implantation carried out before thoracotomy, was preferred for patients with the involvement of cardiac and/or other vascular mediastinal structures. RESULTS: The mean age was 58.4 ± 6.2 years. All patients were affected by non-small cell lung cancer. All 5 patients required a single stent-graft to completely cover the involved segment of aorta. Four patients underwent a 2-stage procedure. One patient, with the involvement of the left inferior pulmonary vein, required a 1-stage en bloc resection of the left lower lobe, aortic wall adventitia, left inferior pulmonary vein, and reconstruction of the left atrial wall. Primary procedural success was achieved in all. At follow-up, no patient developed aortic-related complications. One patient died 2 years after surgery, due to local recurrence of the tumor. CONCLUSION: T4 lung resection combined with aortic stent-graft implantation can be safely performed. Endovascular surgery, by avoiding the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and graft replacement, can reduce significant morbidity and mortality rate. Postoperative and long-term outcome of these patients treated with endovascular surgery is mainly related to pulmonary disease, not to aortic treatment.

A Rare Case of Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis Caused by Streptococcus agalactiae: Emergency Surgical Treatment.

A 70-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency room in cardiac arrest. The patient was resuscitated and then referred to our cardiac surgery department, where he was diagnosed with suspected effusive constrictive pericarditis. A failed trial of TEE-guided pericardiocentesis led to the decision of surgical intervention. Sternotomy was performed and revealed pericardial thickening and very dense adhesions involving the pericardium and both pleurae, suggesting a neoplastic disease. An extensive pericardiectomy and bilateral pleural decortication were performed. After surgery, the patient improved significantly and was discharged from the intensive care unit 24 h later. Pericardial thickening, dense adhesions, the amount and color of pericardial fluid and the aspect of epicardial tissue increased our suspicion of neoplastic disease. Histological samples were sent to be analyzed immediately; a few days later, they were unexpectedly negative for any neoplastic disease but showed a group-B-hemolytic Streptococcus agalactiae infection, which causes pericarditis in extremely rare cases. Postoperatively, the patient, under intravenous antibiotic and anti-inflammatory therapy, remained asymptomatic and was discharged ten days after the surgery. At the three-month follow-up, transthoracic echocardiography showed a normal right and left ventricular function with no pericardial effusion.

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the care of patients with acute and chronic aortic conditions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures. METHODS: Forty departments shared their data on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures between January and May 2020 and January and May 2019 in Europe, Asia and the USA. Admission rates as well as delay from onset of symptoms to referral were compared. RESULTS: No differences in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures were observed between 2020 and the reference period in 2019 [incidence rates ratio (IRR): 0.96, confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.04; P = 0.39]. Also, no difference in the time interval from acute onset of symptoms to referral was recorded (<12 h 32% vs > 12 h 68% in 2020, < 12 h 34% vs > 12 h 66% in 2019 P = 0.29). Conversely, a decline of 35% in elective procedures was seen (IRR: 0.81, CI 0.76-0.87; P < 0.001) with substantial differences between countries and the most pronounced decline in Italy (-40%, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in Switzerland, an increase in the number of elective cases was observed (+35%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no change in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic cases and procedures during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the case load of elective operations and procedures decreased significantly. Patients with acute aortic syndromes presented despite COVID-19 and were managed according to current guidelines. Further analysis is required to prove that deferral of elective cases had no impact on premature mortality.

Off-Label Treatment With Transfemoral Bare Stents for Isolated Aortic Arch Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch dissection is a catastrophic acute event involving the aorta. Its accurate diagnosis and treatment are mandatory to optimize patient outcome. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with transfemoral bare stents of isolated aortic arch dissection as a valid alternative in patients unsuitable for conventional surgery. METHODS: In this case series, we report our experience with 3 patients affected by isolated aortic arch dissection treated with endovascular surgery from February 2019 to May 2019. All patients were associated with severe comorbidities emergently referred at our center. Vascular access was achieved by surgical exposure of the right common femoral artery performed under general anesthesia. All patients were observed for at least 3 months. RESULTS: All patients were treated in a hybrid operative room with transfemoral implantation of a bare metal Jotec E-XL stent released in the aortic arch. The postoperative period was uneventful, and all 3 patients were discharged or transferred on the fourth postoperative day. At follow-up, computed tomography scans showed good results in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: A purely endovascular approach to located aortic arch dissections, with bare stents, remains challenging, although it has been proven to be a valid alternative treatment in some off-label cases.

Acute Aortic Syndromes: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathways.

Acute aortic syndromes are life-threatening medical conditions that include classic acute aortic dissection (AAD), aortic intramural hematoma, penetrating aortic ulcer, and even aortic pseudoaneurysm and traumatic aortic injury. The European Society of Cardiology has designed a multiparametric diagnostic algorithm to provide stepwise diagnosis. All patients with AAD should receive aggressive medical therapy to control blood pressure and heart rate. Urgent surgical repair is recommended for type A AAD. Uncomplicated type B AAD requires aggressive medical therapy. In contrast thoracic endovascular repair is recommended for complicated type B. AAD should be considered a lifelong disease that affects the entire aorta.

Paraneoplatic Obstruction of Descending Thoracic Aorta: A New Indication for Endovascular Surgery?

We describe the rare case of a 61-year-old man admitted to our emergency department with visceral-organ and lower-limb malperfusion because of an unknown retroperitoneal high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and a severe paraneoplastic obstruction of the descending thoracic aorta, treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged within 4 days. At 6-month follow-up, computed tomography showed complete patency of the descending thoracic aorta. This single case experience shows that thoracic endovascular aortic repair can be a less invasive and effective off-label alternative to exclude infiltrated or obstructed descending thoracic aorta, thus avoiding conventional surgery.

Right thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement in the adolescents with bicuspid aortic valve.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared our experience about early and midterm follow-up outcomes for right anterolateral minithoracotomy (RAMT) vs full sternotomy (FS) in surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) among adolescents with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). METHODS: Patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2008 to December 2017. Inclusion criteria were patients with BAV who had to undergo to AVR. They were divided in two groups: RAMT and FS. The choice of RAMT was based on individual surgeon's preferences or when expressly requested by patient that was informed of nonconventional approach. RESULTS: We enrolled 61 patients, 23 in RAMT group and 38 in FS group. The mean age was 15.6 ± 1.7 years for RAMT group and 16.1 ± 1.5 years for FS group (P = .23). The RAMT group had a higher prevalence of female gender (P = .04). The patients in the RAMT group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (115.2 ± 18.5 vs 102.2 ± 16.5 min; P = .006) and cross-clamp time (78.6 ± 18.1 vs 74.3 ± 15.2 min; P = .01). No patients required intraoperative conversion to FS. No differences were found in ventilation times, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital length of stay for both groups. Follow-up echocardiograms were available for all patients at median of 5.2 years (range 0.5-9.6 years, median 5.4 years for RAMT and 5.1 for FS) and no patient required reoperation for aortic prosthesis malfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that RAMT is safe and effective as FS. Although the RAMT operation takes slightly more operation time, it is not associated with major adverse effects.

Accuracy of a 3-Dimensionally Printed Navigational Template for Localizing Small Pulmonary Nodules: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Localization of small lung nodules are challenging because of the difficulty of nodule recognition during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Using 3-dimensional (3-D) printing technology, a navigational template was recently created to assist percutaneous lung nodule localization; however, the efficacy and safety of this template have not yet been evaluated. Objective: To assess the noninferiority of the efficacy and safety of a 3-D-printed navigational template guide for localizing small peripheral lung nodules. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted between October 2016 and October 2017 at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China, compared the safety and precision of lung nodule localization using a template-guided approach vs the conventional computed tomography (CT)-guided approach. In total, 213 surgical candidates with small peripheral lung nodules (<2 cm) were recruited to undergo either CT- or template-guided lung nodule localization. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Interventions: Percutaneous lung nodule localization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the accuracy of lung nodule localization (localizer deviation), and secondary outcomes were procedural duration, radiation dosage, and complication rate. Results: Of the 200 patients randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to the template- and CT-guided groups, most were women (147 vs 53), body mass index ranged from 15.4 to 37.3, the mean (SD) nodule size was 9.7 (2.9) mm, and the mean distance between the outer edge of target nodule and the pleura was 7.8 (range, 0.0-43.9) mm. In total, 190 patients underwent either CT- or template-guided lung nodule localization and subsequent surgery. Among these patients, localizer deviation did not significantly differ between the template- and CT-guided groups (mean [SD], 8.7 [6.9] vs 9.6 [5.8] mm; P = .36). The mean (SD) procedural durations were 7.4 (3.2) minutes for the template-guided group and 9.5 (3.6) minutes for the CT-guided group (P < .001). The mean (SD) radiation dose was 229 (65) mGy × cm in the template-guided group and 313 (84) mGy × cm in CT-guided group (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The use of the 3-D-printed navigational template for localization of small peripheral lung nodules showed efficacy and safety that were not substantially worse than those for the CT-guided approach while significantly simplifying the localization procedure and decreasing patient radiation exposure. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02952261.

The Fate of the Tricuspid Valve After the Transatrial Closure of the Ventricular Septal Defect.

BACKGROUND: The transatrial repair of the ventricular septal defect (VSD) requires an adequate exposure of its rim. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of using the tricuspid valve incision (TVI) technique, with detachment or radial incision, on the postoperative outcome of children undergoing surgical VSD repair. METHODS: From January 2008 to September 2017, we retrospectively enrolled 141 patients, divided into two groups: 97 patients (68.8%) underwent TVI and 44 patients (31.2%) did not undergo TVI. All patients received an echocardiogram upon discharge from the hospital and after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year from the treatment. RESULTS: No perioperative or late deaths occurred. TVI was associated with a slightly longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time, but there were no differences in the surgical outcome between the two groups. Moreover, no differences occurred concerning residual VSD, atrioventricular block, or tricuspid regurgitation at discharge. Echocardiograms at follow-up were available for 134 patients (95%) with a median of 5.3 years (range, 0.5 to 9.3 years), and the degree of tricuspid regurgitation did not differ between groups. No patient required reoperation for tricuspid regurgitation or residual interventricular shunt. Finally, no difference was found when the two TVI subgroups were compared. CONCLUSIONS: TVI should be used whenever intraoperative exposure of VSD is compromised to avoid a residual shunt and atrioventricular block. Here we show that this procedure does not significantly compromise tricuspid function, although a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial is advised to validate this hypothesis.

Treatment with transfemoral bare-metal stent of residual aortic arch dissection after surgical repair of acute type an aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Here we evaluate the usefulness of transfemoral uncovered stent implantation to avoid secondary conventional surgery for residual type A aortic dissection (TAAD) of the aortic arch after ascending aorta replacement. METHODS: From June 2009 to April 2015, 11 patients were treated with transfemoral implantation of uncovered stents in the aortic arch after surgical replacement of ascending aorta performed on average 4.7±2.3 years earlier. An enlarged dissected aortic arch or a dangerous median growth of more than 5 mm/yr or impending rupture presenting as chest pain were indications for treatment. The dissected aortic tracts diameter must not exceed 45 mm. Five patients (45.5%) were treated with Djumbodies Dissection System, 6 patients (54.5%) with Jotec E-XL aortic stent. RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths or permanent neurologic complications. Primary procedural success was obtained in all patients and the residual TAAD in aortic arch was obliterated, with disappearance of the false lumen. Median intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 24 hours; post-operative hospital stay was 5.2±1.4 days. One death, not aortic related, occurred during follow-up period (mean 5.2±1.9 years). Descending thoracic aorta diameter significantly increased in 3 patients (27.3%): one patient (9.0%) needed a secondary conventional surgery, the other 2 (18.2%) of a distal extension with PETTICOAT approach. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular approach with uncovered metal bare stent is surely an evolving strategy to perform a purely endovascular treatment, indicated only for treatment of an aortic arch with a diameter of less than 40 or 45 mm, to avoid progressive thoracic aortic dilatation and/or rupture.

Endovascular Treatment of Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysm Associated with Coarctation of Aorta in a Jehovah's Witness.

Late aneurysm formation in the proximal aorta or distal aortic arch is a recognized sequela of untreated stenosis of the aortic isthmus and is associated with substantial risk of aortic rupture. We describe the case of a 44-year-old man with untreated coarctation of the aorta who presented with a prestenotic dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm. He declined surgery because he was a Jehovah's Witness. Instead, we performed emergency endovascular aortic repair in which 2 stent-grafts were placed in the descending aorta. Our experience suggests that this procedure is a useful and safe alternative to open surgery in patients who have aneurysms associated with coarctation of the aorta.

Y grafts with the left internal mammary artery and radial artery. Mid-term functional and angiographic results. Cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study investigated the functional and haemodynamic mid-term results over 3-years follow up of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) conduit in composite Y-graft configuration with radial artery (RA) in a population of patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: 148 patients who underwent off-pump CABG with composite Y-graft, were evaluated over 3-year follow up. Two-day dipyridamole induced maximal hyperaemia/rest 99mTc-sestamibi was scheduled preoperatively and 36 months after surgery for functional evaluation. Morphological evaluation was performed by 64 slice multidetector computed tomography (CT) 36 months after surgery. RESULTS: Clinical adverse events were rare within 3 years follow up. Minimal to severe scintigraphic evidence of stress induced ischaemia occurred in 24 patients. Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (HR 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-9.3; p = 0.01) and poor coronary run off (HR 4.1; 95% CI, 2.1-10.8; p = 0.005) were significant multivariate predictors of reversible stress induced ischaemia. 64 slice multidetector CT showed that the main stem of Y composite grafts was patent in all patients, while distal LIMA or RA was stenosed or occluded in 9 patients. CONCLUSION: Composite Y-graft was adequate to meet the flow requirements of target coronary artery either at rest or during maximal hyperaemia. The use of Y-graft should be carefully evaluated in patients with LV hypertrophy and/or poor coronary run-off.