Procedural outcomes in children with mild type 1 von Willebrand disease.

Background: In patients with mild type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD), treatment guidelines suggest individualization of surgical management. However, these conditional recommendations are based on very low-certainty evidence due to limited data on surgical outcomes in this population. Objectives: To characterize procedural bleeding prophylaxis strategies and outcomes in children with mild type 1 VWD. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients aged between 0 and 21 years with mild type 1 VWD (defined as von Willebrand factor antigen and/or an activity of 30-50 IU/dL) who underwent a procedure from July 1, 2017, to July 1, 2022. Demographic, surgical, medication, and bleeding data were collected by manual chart review. Results: A total of 161 procedures were performed in 108 patients. The population was primarily female (75%), White (77.8%), and non-Hispanic (79.6%). Median age was 15.8 years (IQR, 8.2-17.6). Fifty-nine surgeries were classified as major, 66 as minor, and 36 as dental. For most procedures, patients received only antifibrinolytics for bleeding prophylaxis (n = 128, 79.5%); desmopressin was used in 17 (10.6%) procedures, and von Willebrand factor concentrate was used in 12 (7.5%) procedures. Bleeding complications occurred in 8 (5.0%) procedures: these included 1 major, 4 clinically relevant nonmajor, and 3 minor bleeding events. No patient required blood transfusion or an additional procedure to achieve hemostasis. Most bleeding complications were seen following intrauterine device (IUD) placement (5/8). Nearly 30% of patients who underwent IUD placement reported bleeding. Conclusion: Pediatric patients with mild type 1 VWD can safely undergo procedures using a tailored approach. Bleeding complications were uncommon, with the majority following IUD placement.

Screening for von Willebrand disease does not impact posttonsillectomy bleeding in a low-risk population.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is an important complication in children following tonsillectomy. Screening with coagulation tests prior to procedure is common to assess bleeding risk in the perioperative period, although ASH/ASPHO Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend against routine PT/PTT testing. Our aim was to compare von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) and activity levels among patients with postoperative bleeding following tonsillectomy to evaluate for potential risk for bleeding. PROCEDURE: Eligible subjects were aged 0-18 without significant personal or family history of major bleeding. Postoperative bleeding diaries were collected and symptoms measured using a postoperative bleeding score. Plasma VWF levels were drawn at time of anesthesia administration. RESULTS: Postoperative bleeding occurred in 248 cases out of 1399 total subjects. Median VWF:Ag was 86 in patients with postoperative bleeding scores of 1-2, 86 for scores 3-4, 84 for scores 5-6, and 83 for scores >6, with no significant difference among groups (p = .98). Additionally, no difference was observed for subjects with multiple days of postoperative bleeding as compared to those with only 1 day of postoperative bleeding. Finally, no difference in VWF:Ag was observed for subjects whose first reported bleed occurred early in the postoperative course compared to those whose first reported bleed occurred later. VWF:Ag does not correlate with severity of bleeding, time of onset of first bleeding event, or recurrence of bleeding in healthy children with no personal or family history of bleeding who have postoperative bleeding following tonsillectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This data does not support routine von Willebrand disease screening prior to tonsillectomy.

Laboratory variability in the diagnosis of type 2 VWD variants.

Essentials Patients with von Willebrand disease were enrolled in our study. Type 2 VWD diagnoses were based on original test results. Repeat evaluation resulted in many patients receiving a different type 2 diagnosis. Some genetic variants were particularly likely to move type 2 subcategories. ABSTRACT: Introduction Type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) refers to patients with a qualitative defect in von Willebrand factor. Accurate diagnosis of type 2 VWD subtypes can be challenging. Aim of the study To compare the historical diagnosis of type 2 VWD with current laboratory testing. Methods Subjects were enrolled in the Zimmerman Program either because of a preexisting diagnosis of VWD (retrospective cohort) or from evaluation for bleeding symptoms or suspected VWD (prospective cohort). Original diagnosis was assigned by the local center and central diagnosis was based on central laboratory testing. Results Two hundred and seventeen index cases in the retrospective cohort and 35 subjects in the prospective cohort carried a local diagnosis of type 2 VWD (29% and 6% of enrolled index cases, respectively). In the retrospective cohort, the diagnosis was confirmed in 66% of cases with a preexisting diagnosis of 2A, 77% 2B, 54% 2M, and 72% 2N. In the prospective cohort, 31% were confirmed 2A, 60% 2B, 23% 2M, and 100% 2N. Several genetic variants were repeatedly implicated in subjects with changed diagnosis: p.M1304R, p.R1315C, p.R1374C, and p.R1374H. Conclusions Both the prospective and retrospective cohorts demonstrated consistent variation in subjects whose diagnosis changed between 2A, 2B, and 2M. The importance of accurately diagnosing type 2 VWD may be most significant in the 2B subtype given potential concerns with the use of desmopressin in type 2B VWD. Some genetic variants appear in multiple types of VWD, making specific diagnoses challenging.