Infant consumption of 100% lactose-based and reduced lactose infant formula in the United States: Review of NHANES data from 1999 to 2020.

OBJECTIVES: An acceptable alternative to human milk is US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)-registered infant formula, which must meet the requirements of the US FDA Infant Formula Act. Human milk contains lactose, but some infant formulas may contain alternative carbohydrate sources such as corn syrup solids, maltodextrin, and sucrose. Recent research shows that infant-formula made with corn syrup solids may be associated with increased obesity risk in the first 5 years of life. A previous study found that of all formulas purchased, 59.0% were lactose-reduced. More US infants consume infant formula with nonlactose carbohydrates more frequently than is medically necessary. The purpose of this study is to use National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data to describe the type and prevalence of nonlactose carbohydrates consumed in infant formula. METHODS: NHANES data from 1999 to 2020 was used to perform cross-sectional analyses and analyses of comparison of prevalence over time on consumption of nonlactose carbohydrate sources in infant formulas. RESULTS: We identified 3709 unique infant IDs associated with 36,084 feeding sessions. More than half of the feeding sessions involved a formula with at least one nonlactose carbohydrate. Feeding sessions involving a formula with at least one nonlactose carbohydrate increased by 163% from 1999-2004 to 2017-2020; formulas containing single or multiple nonlactose carbohydrate types account for the increase in prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights an increase in the consumption of infant formula containing a nonlactose carbohydrate. More studies are needed to understand the short- and long-term effects of early exposure to these carbohydrates.

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Infant Diet, Outcomes, Consumer Behavior and Parental Perspectives to Optimize Infant Feeding in Response to the 2022 U.S. Infant Formula Shortage.

In May of 2022, millions of U.S. parents encountered uncertainty in safely feeding their infants due to the infant formula shortage. METHODS: An anonymous, electronic, cross-sectional, retrospective survey was used. RESULTS: U.S. parents (n = 178) whose infants were ~10 weeks old during the shortage completed the survey. Of parents, 81% switched formulas during the shortage, 87% switched because they could not find the formula they typically used, 34% switched 3-5 times, 29% of parents visited ≥4 stores/24 h and 26% of parents traveled >20 miles/24 h to purchase formula. Use of infant formula increased (p < 0.01); in infants requiring specialty formula, use of intact cow's milk formula increased (p < 0.05) and use of premature infant formulas decreased (p < 0.05). Infants relying on specialty formulas experienced at least one undesirable outcome compared with non-specialty users. Parents used social media, relatives/friends and healthcare providers for support during the shortage, but their helpfulness scores were suboptimal. Parents reported the need for greater infant formula availability, free prenatal lactation education and postpartum lactation support. CONCLUSIONS: Government, regulatory and healthcare policy oversight are needed to protect the infant feeding system, including more commercially available products, access to banked donor milk and lactation support.

Nutrition Content of Young Child Formulas.

OBJECTIVE: European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the American Academy of Pediatrics state that young child formula (YCF) is not considered necessary for healthy children. Despite these recommendations, YCF accounts for approximately 13% of overall formula sales. Five percent of infants less than 1 year of age in the United States are being fed YCF. The purpose of this study is to identify the most Internet recommended and encountered YCF in the United States and determine if they meet nutritional recommendations for use in children 0-3 years. STUDY DESIGN: We used the search terms "toddler formula," "toddler milk," "follow-up formula," or "young child formula" in Google and DuckDuckGo to identify the most like encountered or recommended YCF on the Internet. We compared their labeled nutrients to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Infant Formula Act (IFA) and international nutrient recommendations, given the absence of US nutrient requirements for YCF recommendations, for children 12-36 months. RESULTS: Twenty-nine YCF were reviewed. On average, YCF did not meet nutrient recommendations for infants and toddlers with 2.17 and 4.6 ingredients not meeting formula recommendations for younger and older infants, respectively, and between 3 and 4 ingredients for 12-36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition content of YCF are variable and do not meet FDA IFA requirements or YCF international recommendations. Increased US regulation is needed for YCF. It is important for health care providers to ask patients what they are feeding their infants and toddlers so they can educate parents on potential nutritional safety concerns.

Nutritional and Safety Concerns of Infant Feeding Trends.

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition recommend either exclusively breastfeeding for at least 6 months or an u.S. Food and Drug Administration-reviewed infant formula or donor breast milk from an established milk bank as alternatives. The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of contemporary infant feeding practices such as informal human milk sharing, imported European infant formula, toddler formula and homemade formula and gain insight into the parental reasoning for their choices. STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous, cross-sectional, voluntary electronic survey was sent to active prescribers to a Yumi (a baby food subscription company) list server in April and May 2021. Basic demographic, utilization of infant feeding practices and general feeding practices were collected. RESULTS: Of 2315 respondents, at least 18% of the families were following at least one contemporary feeding practice. Thirty six percent of parents using donor breast milk obtained it from unregulated sources, 14% of the respondents were using European infant formula, 5% were using toddler formula for their infants, and 2% were making homemade infant formula. CONCLUSION: The AAP has clear guidelines on infant nutrition and breastfeeding and when not possible, FDA reviewed infant formula or donor breast milk from an established milk bank as alternatives. Yet, our study found that at least 18% of the families across the united States were following at least one contemporary feeding practice with possible nutritional and safety concerns. it is important for pediatric gastroenterologists and dieticians to ask their patients how they are feeding their infants and be aware of these feeding practices that may pose significant health risks.

Non-FDA-Reviewed Imported European Formula Use Among Parents in Urban Pediatric Private Practice.

In 2018, the American Academy of Pediatrics warned consumers over the increasing use of imported infant formulas. The purpose of this study was to assess the usage of imported European infant formula among parents in a large urban private practice. An anonymous survey was distributed at well-child appointments to a convenience sample of parents at an urban private pediatric practice from November 2017 to March 2018. Of the 750 eligible respondents, 552 (74%) completed the survey. Of the parents using formula, 20% were using imported European infant formulas. The most commonly used formula was Holle (33%), and 72% were acquired from web-based third-party vendors. Parents chose to use these formulas because they believed that European formulas contained better ingredients. Only 8% of parents received information about European infant formula from their pediatricians. Pediatricians need to be aware of these formulas and their risks to educate families on the use and safety of these formulas.

Comparison of Imported European and US Infant Formulas: Labeling, Nutrient and Safety Concerns.

OBJECTIVE: Infant formula in the United States is highly regulated. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has reported concerns over the use of non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-registered imported infant formulas. The purpose of this study is to identify Internet purchased and recommended imported European infant formulas and compare them with FDA labeling and nutrient requirements. STUDY DESIGN: We searched "European infant formulas" in Google and DuckDuckGo to identify vendors of European formulas and blogs discussing these formulas to determine the most frequently purchased and recommended brands. We then compared the identified European formula's label and listed nutrients to FDA labeling and nutrient requirements. RESULTS: Thirteen of 18 vendors responded to our inquiry of their top selling formula and 17 blogs were reviewed. Sixteen formulas were identified. None met all FDA label requirements. Listed nutrients fell within FDA requirements in 15 of 16 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Non-FDA-registered imported European formulas do not meet all FDA-labeling requirements. Although linoleic acid, which was not listed on all of the European formulas, could not be evaluated, all formulas except one met the remaining FDA nutrient requirements. These European infant formulas are being imported into the United States via third party vendors and are not FDA-regulated, limiting the notable consumer protections set by the FDA that ensure infant formula safety. Pediatric gastroenterologists and healthcare providers need to understand the composition, labelling and lack of FDA regulation and safety concerns of these formulas in order to better counsel parents.

TV guides: exposure of hospitalized children to inappropriate programming.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the policy recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) regarding television viewing are heeded in an inpatient pediatric setting. SETTING: An inner-city academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 199 pediatric inpatients. METHODS: An investigator visited all pediatric inpatient rooms. Observations were made when the patient was present in the room, alert, and awake. The main outcome measure was exposure to inappropriate programming. In accordance with AAP guidelines, we used the established television rating system to code programs as appropriate versus inappropriate for children. We classified G- and PG-rated shows that centered on adult themes or that were not informational, educational, and nonviolent as inappropriate. We tested parental demographics, age of child, time of day, and presence of an adult in the room as possible predictors. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of the patients had the television turned on. Of these, 53% were tuned to inappropriate programming. Exposure to inappropriate programming did not differ by parental ethnicity, language, or education. Exposure was highest for infants and toddlers as compared with children or adolescents (74% vs 40% vs 52%, P =.001); it did not vary by time of day. Exposure was higher when an adult was present in the room (58% vs 42%, P =.05); this effect was most pronounced for adolescents (68% vs 41%, P =.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite AAP recommendations, hospitalized children are exposed to inappropriate programming, especially when parents are present in the room. Hospital stays may be a unique opportunity to educate parents about the AAP recommendations for television viewing by children.