Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vis Exp ; (175)2021 09 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34542531

RESUMO

Targeting of microbubbles (ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging) has been researched for more than two decades. However, methods of microbubble preparation and targeting ligand attachment are cumbersome, complicated, and lengthy. Therefore, there is a need to simplify the targeted microbubble preparation procedure to bring it closer to clinical translation. The purpose of this publication is to provide a detailed description and explanation of the steps necessary for targeted microbubble preparation, functional characterization and testing. A sequence of the optimized and simplified procedures is presented for two systems: a biotin-streptavidin targeting pair model, and a cyclic RGD peptide targeting the recombinant αvß3 protein, which is overexpressed on the endothelial lining of the tumor neovasculature. Here, we show the following: covalent coupling of the targeting ligand to a lipid anchor, assessment of the reagent quality, and tests that confirm the successful completion of the reaction; preparation of the aqueous precursor medium containing microbubble shell components, followed by microbubble preparation via amalgamation; assessment of the efficacy of lipid transfer onto the microbubble stabilizer shell; adjustment of microbubble size distribution by flotation at normal gravity to remove larger microbubbles that might be detrimental for in vivo use; assessment of microbubble size distribution by electrozone sensing; evaluation of targeted binding of the microbubbles to receptor-coated surface in a static binding assay test (in an inverted dish); and evaluation of targeted binding of the microbubbles to receptor-coated surface in a parallel plate flow chamber test.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Microbolhas , Imagem Molecular , Estreptavidina , Ultrassonografia
2.
Invest Radiol ; 55(11): 736-740, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569011

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Molecular ultrasound imaging of tumor vasculature is being actively investigated with microbubble contrast agents targeted to neovasculature biomarkers. Yet, a universal method of targeting tumor vasculature independent of specific biomarkers, or in their absence, would be desirable. We report the use of electrostatic interaction to achieve adherence of microbubbles to tumor vasculature and resulting tumor delineation by ultrasound imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Microbubbles were prepared from decafluorobutane gas by amalgamation of aqueous micellar medium. Distearoyl phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-stearate were used as microbubble shell-forming lipids; cationic lipid distearoyl trimethylammoniumpropane (DSTAP) was included to introduce positive electrostatic charge. Microbubbles were subjected to flotation in normal gravity, to remove larger particles. Murine colon adenocarcinoma tumor (MC38, J. Schlom, National Institutes of Health) was inoculated in the hind leg of C57BL/6 mice. Contrast ultrasound imaging was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, using a clinical imaging system in low power mode, with tissue signal suppression (contrast pulse sequencing, 7 MHz, 1 Hz; Mechanical Index, 0.2). The ultrasound probe was positioned to monitor the tumor and contralateral leg muscle; microbubble contrast signal was monitored for 30 minutes or more, after intravenous bolus administration of 2.10 microbubbles. Individual time point frames were extracted from ultrasound video recording and analyzed with ImageJ. RESULTS: Mean bubble diameter was ~1.6 to 2 µm; 99.9% were less than 5 µm, to prevent blocking blood flow in capillaries. For cationic DSTAP-carrying microbubbles, contrast signal was observed in the tumor beyond 30 minutes after injection. As the fraction of positively charged lipid in the bubble shell was increased, adherent contrast signal in the tumor also increased, but accumulation of DSTAP-microbubbles in the normal muscle increased as well. For bubbles with the highest positive charge tested, DSTAP-DSPC molar ratio 1:4, at 10 minutes after intravenous administration of microbubbles, the contrast signal difference between the tumor and normal muscle was 1.5 (P < 0.005). At 30 minutes, tumor/muscle contrast signal ratio improved and reached 2.1. For the DSTAP-DSPC 1:13 preparation, tumor/muscle signal ratio exceeded 3.6 at 10 minutes and reached 5.4 at 30 minutes. Microbubbles with DSTAP-DSPC ratio 1:22 were optimal for tumor targeting: at 10 minutes, tumor/muscle signal ratio was greater than 7 (P < 0.005); at 30 minutes, greater than 16 (P < 0.01), sufficient for tumor delineation. CONCLUSIONS: Cationic microbubbles are easy to prepare. They selectively accumulate in the tumor vasculature after intravenous administration. These microbubbles provide target-to-control contrast ratio that can exceed an order of magnitude. Adherent microbubbles delineate the tumor mass at extended time points, at 30 minutes and beyond. This may allow for an extension of the contrast ultrasound examination time. Overall, positively charged microbubbles could become a universal ultrasound contrast agent for cancer imaging.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/irrigação sanguínea , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Colo/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste/química , Microbolhas , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Animais , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Fosfatidilcolinas/química , Polietilenoglicóis/química
3.
Langmuir ; 35(31): 10034-10041, 2019 08 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509068

RESUMO

For preparation of ligand-decorated microbubbles for targeted ultrasound contrast imaging, it is important to maximize the amount of ligand associated with the bubble shell. We describe optimization of the use of a biocompatible cosurfactant in the microbubble formulation media to maximize the incorporation of targeting ligand-lipid conjugate into the microbubble shell, and thus reduce the fraction of ligand not associated with microbubbles, following amalgamation preparation. The influence of the concentration of a helper cosurfactant propylene glycol (PG) on the efficacy of microbubble preparation by amalgamation and on the degree of association of fluorescent PEG-lipid with the microbubble shell was tested. Three sets of targeted bubbles were then prepared: with VCAM-1-targeting peptide VHPKQHRGGSK(FITC)GC-PEG-DSPE, cyclic RGDfK-PEG-DSPE, selective for αVß3, and control cRADfK-PEG-DSPE, without such affinity. Microbubbles were prepared by 45 s amalgamation, with DSPC and PEG stearate as the main components of the shell, with 15% PG in aqueous saline. In vitro microbubble targeting was assessed with a parallel plate flow chamber with a recombinant receptor coated surface. In vivo targeting was assessed in MC-38 tumor-bearing mice (subcutaneous tumor in hind leg), 10 min after intravenous bolus of microbubble contrast agent (20 million particles per injection). Ultrasound imaging of the tumor and control nontarget muscle tissue in a contralateral leg was performed with a clinical scanner. Amalgamation technique with PG cosurfactant produced microbubbles at concentrations exceeding 2 × 109 particles/mL, and ∼50-60% or more of the added fluorescein-PEG-DSPE or VCAM-1-targeted fluorescent peptide was associated with microbubbles, about 2 times higher than that in the absence of PG. After intravenous injection, peptide-targeted bubbles selectively accumulated in the tumor vasculature, with negligible accumulation in nontumor contralateral leg muscle, or with control nontargeted microbubbles (assessed by contrast ultrasound imaging). For comparison, administration of RGD-decorated microbubbles prepared by traditional sonication, and purified from free peptide-PEG-lipid by repeated centrifugation, resulted in the same accumulation pattern as for translatable amalgamated microbubbles. Following amalgamation in the presence of PG, efficient transfer of ligand-PEG-lipid to microbubble shell was achieved and quantified. Purification of microbubbles from free peptide-PEG-lipid was not necessary, as proven by in vitro and in vivo targeting studies, so PG cosurfactant amalgamation technique generated peptide-targeted microbubbles are amenable for bedside preparation and clinical translation. The pathway to clinical translation is simplified by the fact that most of the materials used in this study either are on the United States Food and Drug Administration GRAS list or can be procured as pharmaceutical grade substances.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste/química , Microbolhas , Peptídeos Cíclicos/química , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Animais , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Camundongos , Ultrassonografia/métodos
4.
Invest Radiol ; 51(12): 758-766, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27654582

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the minimum microbubble dose for ultrasound molecular imaging to achieve statistically significant detection of angiogenesis in a mouse model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preburst minus postburst method was implemented on a Verasonics ultrasound research scanner using a multiframe compounding pulse inversion imaging sequence. Biotinylated lipid (distearoyl phosphatidylcholine-based) microbubbles that were conjugated with antivascular endothelial growth factor 2 (VEGFR2) antibody (MBVEGFR2) or isotype control antibody (MBControl) were injected into mice carrying adenocarcinoma xenografts. Different injection doses ranging from 5 × 10 to 1 × 10 microbubbles per mouse were evaluated to determine the minimum diagnostically effective dose. RESULTS: The proposed imaging sequence was able to achieve statistically significant detection (P < 0.05, n = 5) of VEGFR2 in tumors with a minimum MBVEGFR2 injection dose of only 5 × 10 microbubbles per mouse (distearoyl phosphatidylcholine at 0.053 ng/g mouse body mass). Nonspecific adhesion of MBControl at the same injection dose was negligible. In addition, the targeted contrast ultrasound signal of MBVEGFR2 decreased with lower microbubble doses, whereas nonspecific adhesion of MBControl increased with higher microbubble doses. CONCLUSIONS: The dose of 5 × 10 microbubbles per animal is now the lowest injection dose on record for ultrasound molecular imaging to achieve statistically significant detection of molecular targets in vivo. Findings in this study provide us with further guidance for future developments of clinically translatable ultrasound molecular imaging applications using a lower dose of microbubbles.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Imagem Molecular/métodos , Neovascularização Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Fosfatidilcolinas/administração & dosagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Animais , Meios de Contraste/metabolismo , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Microbolhas , Neovascularização Patológica/patologia , Fosfatidilcolinas/metabolismo , Receptor 2 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...