Diagnosing Growth Hormone Deficiency: Can a Combined Arginine and Clonidine Stimulation Test Replace 2 Separate Tests?

OBJECTIVE: Given the large number of false-positive growth hormone deficiency (GHD) diagnoses from a single growth hormone (GH) stimulation test in children, 2 different pharmacologic tests, performed on separate days or sequentially, are required. This study aimed to assess the reliability and safety of a combined arginine-clonidine stimulation test (CACST). METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. During 2017-2019, 515 children aged >8 years underwent GH stimulation tests (CACST: n = 362 or clonidine stimulation test [CST]: n = 153). The main outcome measures used to compare the tests were GH response (sufficiency/deficiency) and amplitude and timing of peak GH and safety parameters. RESULTS: Population characteristics were as follows: median age of 12.2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.7, 13.4), 331 boys (64%), and 282 prepubertal children (54.8%). The GHD rate was comparable with 12.7% for CACST and 14.4% for CST followed by a confirmatory test (glucagon or arginine) (P = .609). Peak GH was higher and occurred later in response to CACST compared with CST (14.6 ng/mL [IQR: 10.6, 19.4] vs 11.4 ng/mL [IQR: 7.0, 15.8], respectively, P < .001; 90 minutes [IQR: 60, 90] vs 60 minutes [IQR: 60, 90], respectively, P < .001). No serious adverse events occurred following CACST. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the reliability and safety of CACST in detecting GHD in late childhood and adolescence, suggesting that it may replace separate or sequential GH stimulation tests. By diminishing the need for the second GH stimulation test, CACST saves time, is more cost-effective, and reduces discomfort for children, caregivers, and medical staff.

Diagnosis of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Children: The Efficacy of Glucagon versus Clonidine Stimulation Test.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of childhood growth hormone deficiency (GHD) requires a failure to respond to 2 GH stimulation tests (GHSTs) performed with different stimuli. The most commonly used tests are glucagon stimulation test (GST) and clonidine stimulation test (CST). This study assesses and compares GST and CST's diagnostic efficacy for the initial evaluation of short children. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center, observational study of 512 short children who underwent GHST with GST first or CST first and a confirmatory test with the opposite stimulus in cases of initial GH peak <7.5 ng/mL during 2015-2018. The primary outcome measure was the efficacy of the GST first or CST first in diagnosing GHD. RESULTS: Population characteristics include median age of 9.3 years (interquartile range 6.2, 12.1), 78.3% prepubertal, and 61% boys. Subnormal GH response in the initial test was recorded in 204 (39.8%) children: 148 (45.5%) in GST first and 56 (30%) in CST first, p < 0.001. Confirmatory tests verified GHD in 75/512 (14.6%) patients. Divergent results between the initial and confirmatory tests were more prevalent in GST first than CST first (103/148 [69.6%] vs. 26/56 [46.4%], p < 0.001) indicating a significantly lower error rate for the CST first compared to the GST first. In multivariate analysis, the only significant predictive variable for divergent results between the tests was the type of stimulation test (OR = 0.349 [95% CI 0.217, 0.562], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Screening of GH status with CST first is more efficient than that with GST first in diagnosing GHD in short children with suspected GHD. It is suggested that performing CST first may reduce the need for a second provocative test and avoid patients' inconvenience of undergoing 2 serial tests.