Synchronous "skip" facial metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma: a case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Skin metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma are rare conditions that are metachronous in most of cases and may represent the first sign of a recurrence. These lesions are usually located to the abdominal wall on postoperative scars, perineum and chest due to direct spread from the tumor or to the lymphatic and venous dissemination. We describe a rare case of synchronous skin metastases in a patient affected by sigmoid adenocarcinoma with no sign of liver and lung repetitive lesions. CASE PRESENTATION: We admitted a 59 years old male, with no relevant medical history. He was evaluated by our tertiary center of colorectal surgery complaining diarrhoea and abdominal pain. The physical examination revealed a palpable mass in left flank of the abdomen. The colonoscopy showed a sub-stenosis of the sigmoid colon (G2 adenocarcinoma). No repetitive lesions were detected by the preoperative CT scan. The patient reported a rapid grow of a soft supralabial and chin nodules in the last 2 months, which he believed to be related to the use of the mask due to COVID-19 pandemic. A laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision and a local excision of both facial nodules were performed. The histological examination revealed a poorly differentiated signet ring cell colorectal adenocarcinoma with metastases in seven pericolic lymphonodes. The excisional biopsy of the skin nodules revealed a subcutaneous metastases from primary colorectal tumour. CONCLUSIONS: As far as we know, synchronous facial metastases from colorectal cancer in the absence of any other metastases has never been described before. The onset of new skin nodules in patients affected by colorectal cancer should raise-up the clinical suspicion of metastatic lesions even when repetitive lesions are not detected in the liver or lungs.

Ageing with sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence: how many patients get benefit after more than 10 years?

Sacral nerve modulation (SNM) has represented a major advancement in the minimally invasive management of patients with fecal incontinence (FI). Although the success rate in the short-medium term has widely been demonstrated, the very long-term outcomes are poorly investigated. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of SNM in a cohort of patients with a follow-up longer than 10 years. Clinical records of patients submitted to SNM for FI in our tertiary referral colorectal Unit between 1998 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed looking for status of the implantable pulse generator (IPG), follow-up duration, severity of FI by the St Marks' score and quality of life. 58 patients fulfilled the entry criteria and 36 (58%, median follow-up, 12 years) accepted to take part to the telephone interview, while 22 (38%) were lost to the follow-up. Nineteen patients had their IPG removed (Group A) while 17 (27%) had the SNM still active after a median follow-up of 13 years (Group B). In the group A, the median baseline St Marks' score was 13 and did not change after the IPG removal. In group B, the median baseline St Marks' score was 14, at last IPG substitution, it was of 7 and at the last follow-up dropped to 4. In the group A, the median SF-12 physical and mental scores did not change significantly while they improved significantly in group B. A progressive deterioration of the success rate of SNM with the time has been documented after a very long-term follow-up.

The REALISE score: a new statistically validated scoring system to assess the severity of anal fissures.

BACKGROUND: Anal fissure (AF) is a common, painful disease that strongly affects patients' quality of life, however, no scoring system to assess the severity of AF is available in the literature. The aim of this study was to set up and validate a reliable scoring system to quantify the severity of AF, to be used in prospective trials comparing the efficacy and the outcomes of surgical or medical treatments. METHODS: The study was conducted on patients with acute or chronic AF and a control group in a tertiary centre for coloproctology in June 2020-September 2020. Two researchers independently carried out a structured interviewer-led questionnaire at two different time points (T1/T2). The questionnaire consisted of five items selected according to the most commonly reported symptoms for AF: the item pain, was scored from 0 to 10 using a visual analogue scale, and quality of life, duration of pain, use of painkillers, and bleeding were scored from 1 to 5 using Likert-scale questions. The scoRing systEm for AnaL fIsSurE (REALISE) score was the sum of the points. Patients with AF and a control group of patients with haemorrhoids, anal fistula, or obstructed defecation syndrome entered the study. Main outcome measures were reliability, inter-/intraobserver agreement, and repeatability. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty well-matched patients (75 with AF and 75 controls) were enrolled. A significant difference was found between the mean REALISE score for patients with AF and controls (p < 0.001). The two REALISE scores were highly correlated (r = 0.99). The coefficient of repeatability was 1.45 in T1 and 1.18 in T2. CONCLUSIONS: The REALISE score may have an important role in the assessment and management of AF, in grading the severity of AF and comparing results of different treatments.