Anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibodies in ACPA-Negative and ACPA-Positive Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The objective of this study was to assess the level of antibodies to carbamylated proteins and analyze the clinical and immunological associations in patients with ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive variants of rheumatoid arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: . The study involved 150 patients with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and 25 patients as healthy controls. Depending on ACPA values, two groups of patients were recruited: ACPA-positive (n = 75) and ACPA-negative (n = 75). RA activity was assessed by the DAS28 index. Determination of antibodies to carbamylated proteins was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (BlueGene Biotech, China). Quantitative determination of ACPA in serum was performed by enzyme immunoassay using a commercial reagent kit (AxisShield, UK; upper limit of normal 5.0 U/mL; Orgentec, Germany; upper limit of normal 20.0 U/mL). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: . Median anti-CarP in patients with RA was 126.2 [100.83; 157.41] ng/mL and was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in healthy controls (88.89 [70.53; 107.75] ng/mL). Among all patients with RA, 50 (33.3%) were anti-Carp-positive (22 (29.3%) in the ACPA(+) group and 28 (37.3%) in the ACPA(-) group), and one (2%) volunteer from healthy controls was anti-CarP(+) (p = 0.002). In ROC analysis performed to assess the diagnostic significance of anti-CarP for RA for all patients with RA, the area under the curve was 0.783 ± 0.047 with 95% CI: 0.691-0.874 (p < 0.001), with a cut-off point of 143 ng/mL, specificity 96%, sensitivity 36.7%. In the ACPA(+) RA group, the erosion count was statistically significantly higher (p = 0.044) in anti-CarP(+) patients than in anti-CarP(-) patients. A weak direct correlation between anti-CarP and DAS28 was found in the ACPA(-) RA group. CONCLUSIONS: . We studied the predictive value of anti-CarP as an auxiliary biomarker in ACPA(+) and ACPA(-) subtypes of RA. ACPA(+) anti-CarP(+) patients have a more "erosive" subtype of the disease than ACPA(+) anti-CarP(-) patients. In ACPA(-) patients, anti-CarP helps to identify a more erosive subtype of the disease, and among ACPA(-) patients it helps to reduce the proportion of seronegative patients. Further studies are required to determine the optimal standards for the laboratory diagnosis of anti-CarP and to clarify the diagnostic potential of these ABs as part of the differential diagnosis of arthritis in other rheumatic diseases.

Clinical Features of ACPA-Negative and ACPA-Positive Variants of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The aim of the study was to investigate the features of the clinical picture of the disease in patients with ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive variants of rheumatoid arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : The study included patients with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to the criteria of ACR/EULAR 2010. Depending on the ACPA values, two groups of patients were recruited: ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative, comparable in gender, age, duration of the disease, and therapy. The nature of the onset and course of the disease and the activity of RA were evaluated (according to the DAS28, SDAI, CDAI indices). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: : The study involved 79 patients with ACPA-negative variant of RA and 79 ACPA-positive patients. The age of patients (Me [IR] (in years)) with the ACPA(-) variant was 52 [39; 62]; with the ACPA(+) variant, 54 [42; 62]; the duration of the disease (in months) was 59 [23; 122] and 48 [17; 84], respectively. In ACPA(+) patients, a higher disease activity was determined (by the indices DAS 28crp, DAS28esr, SDAI, CDAI), higher values of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and a greater number of painful and swollen joints (p < 0.05). According to the localization of the involved joints, arthritis of the proximal interphalangeal, metacarpal, wrist and shoulder joints was more often determined in ACPA(+) patients. Systemic manifestations of RA at the time of examination and in the anamnesis were statistically significantly more common in ACPA(+) (32.9%) than in ACPA(-) (17.7%) patients. Of the systemic manifestations, rheumatoid nodules were more common in ACPA(+) patients, whereas a tendency to a higher frequency of neuropathy, sclerites, and episcleritis was revealed in ACPA(-) patients. CONCLUSIONS: . In patients with ACPA(-) subtype, clinical signs of joint damage and the inflammatory component are less pronounced compared to ACPA(+). However, the mixed picture of manifestation, the less "bright" course of the disease, the absence of characteristic immunological biomarkers necessitate long-term and careful monitoring of this group of patients. At the same time, the subjective severity of the disease and dysfunction due to ankylosing joints do not differ from the ACPA(+) variant of RA.