Comparison of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting mortality in critically ill patients*.

OBJECTIVE: Impaired consciousness has been incorporated in prediction models that are used in the ICU. The Glasgow Coma Scale has value but is incomplete and cannot be assessed in intubated patients accurately. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score may be a better predictor of mortality in critically ill patients. SETTING: Thirteen ICUs at five U.S. hospitals. SUBJECTS: One thousand six hundred ninety-five consecutive unselected ICU admissions during a six-month period in 2012. DESIGN: Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score were recorded within 1 hour of admission. Baseline characteristics and physiologic components of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation system, as well as mortality were linked to Glasgow Coma Scale/Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score information. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We recruited 1,695 critically ill patients, of which 1,645 with complete data could be linked to data in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation system. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of predicting ICU mortality using the Glasgow Coma Scale was 0.715 (95% CI, 0.663-0.768) and using the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score was 0.742 (95% CI, 0.694-0.790), statistically different (p = 0.001). A similar but nonsignificant difference was found for predicting hospital mortality (p = 0.078). The respiratory and brainstem reflex components of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score showed a much wider range of mortality than the verbal component of Glasgow Coma Scale. In multivariable models, the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score was more useful than the Glasgow Coma Scale for predicting mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score might be a better prognostic tool of ICU mortality than the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients, most likely a result of incorporating brainstem reflexes and respiration into the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score.

A multicenter prospective study of interobserver agreement using the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score coma scale in the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: The classification of the comatose patient has been greatly improved with the use of coma scales. The Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score has emerged as an alternative to the Glasgow Coma Scale in that it incorporates essential information needed to assess the depth of coma. One set of patients for which the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score could be particularly beneficial is those admitted to an intensive care unit, where approximately 30%-35% of all patients are intubated or ventilated. This manuscript reports on a study that examined the inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score in five intensive care units. SETTING: Seven intensive care units at five U.S. hospitals partici-pated. SUBJECTS: Patients admitted during parts of 2010 and 2011 had their Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score assessed independently by two nurses within 1 hr of admission. DESIGN: We evaluated the weighted kappa statistic of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score over all patients and stratified by mechanical ventilation status. Finally, we looked for evidence of heterogeneity in Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score agreement across hospitals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 907 adult critically ill patients had Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score assessments by two evaluators. The overall weighted kappa statistic was 0.92, and this did not differ by whether or not a patient was on a ventilator. Among hospitals there was modest heterogeneity for the weighted kappa; however, all of the values were >0.80. CONCLUSIONS: The Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score showed excellent inter-rater agreement overall and at each of the five hospitals. This demonstrates that the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score can be utilized reliably in critically ill patients.