Impact of Interventions on the Survival of Salmonella enterica I 4,[5],1 2:i:- in Pork.

ABSTRACT: A mixed culture of Salmonella enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- isolates was compared with a mixed culture of reference Salmonella serovars and nonpathogenic Escherichia coli surrogates. The two groups of Salmonella were compared for their resistance to commonly used pork carcass interventions, survival in ground pork, and thermal resistance in ground pork. No differences in responses were observed between the two groups of Salmonella serovars and the nonpathogenic E. coli surrogates within intervention type. No differences in recovery and survival or in heat resistance were observed between the two groups of Salmonella serovars in pork that had been treated, ground, and stored at 5°C for 2 weeks. However, the heat resistance of both groups of Salmonella serovars decreased after refrigerated storage. Because no differences were observed between Salmonella serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- and the reference Salmonella serovars in response to interventions commonly used in the pork industry, Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- does not present a unique challenge to the pork industry.

Dissolved carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations in purge of vacuum-packaged pork chops and the relationship to shelf life and models for estimating microbial populations.

The objectives of this study were to determine the dissolved CO2 and O2 concentrations in the purge of vacuum-packaged pork chops over a 60 day storage period, and to elucidate the relationship of dissolved CO2 and O2 to the microbial populations and shelf life. As the populations of spoilage bacteria increased, the dissolved CO2 increased and the dissolved O2 decreased in the purge. Lactic acid bacteria dominated the spoilage microflora, followed by Enterobacteriaceae and Brochothrix thermosphacta. The surface pH decreased to 5.4 due to carbonic acid and lactic acid production before rising to 5.7 due to ammonia production. A mathematical model was developed which estimated microbial populations based on dissolved CO2 concentrations. Scanning electron microscope images were also taken of the packaging film to observe the biofilm development. The SEM images revealed a two-layer biofilm on the packaging film that was the result of the tri-phase growth environment.

The effect of pH and nitrite concentration on the antimicrobial impact of celery juice concentrate compared with conventional sodium nitrite on Listeria monocytogenes.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of pH and nitrite from celery juice concentrate (CJ) on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes in broth and on ham slices, and to evaluate the impact of pH and nitrite from CJ on quality attributes of the ham. The pH of both broth and ham were increased by the addition of CJ. The CJ was less effective than conventional nitrite at 100 mg/kg nitrite in broth, but in ham, the CJ treatments at both 100 and 200 mg/kg resulted in growth of L. monocytogenes (p>0.05) similar to that of the conventional nitrite at the same concentrations. Reducing the pH of CJ before addition to the ham had greater impact on L. monocytogenes growth at 200 mg/kg nitrite than at 100 mg/kg. Celery juice concentrate may increase meat product pH which could have implications for the antimicrobial impact of nitrite in some products.

Control of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in chicken breast meat by irradiation combined with modified atmosphere packaging.

Salmonella is one of the leading causes of human foodborne illnesses originating from meat and poultry products. Cross-contamination of Salmonella from raw to cooked products continues to be problematic in the food industry. Therefore, new intervention strategies are needed for meat and poultry products. Vacuum or modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) are common packaging techniques used to extend the shelf life of meat products. Irradiation has been well established as an antibacterial treatment to reduce pathogens on meat and poultry. Combining irradiation with high-CO(2)+CO MAP was investigated in this study for improving the control of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium on chicken breast meat. The radiation sensitivities (D10-values) of this pathogen in chicken breast meat were found to be similar in vacuum and in high-CO(2)+CO MAP (0.55 ± 0.03 kGy and 0.54 ± 0.03 kGy, respectively). Irradiation at 1.5 kGy reduced the Salmonella population by an average of 3 log. Some Salmonella cells survived in both vacuum and high-CO(2) + CO MAP through 6 weeks of refrigerated storage following irradiation. This pathogen also grew in both vacuum and MAP when the product was held at 25°C. This study demonstrated that irradiation is an effective means of reducing Salmonella on meat or poultry, but packaging in either vacuum or MAP had little impact during subsequent refrigerated storage.

The REFLECT statement: reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration.

Concerns about the completeness and accuracy of reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the impact of poor reporting on decision-making have been documented in the medical field over the past several decades. Experience from RCTs in human medicine would suggest that failure to report critical trial features can be associated with biased estimated effect measures, and there is evidence to suggest similar biases occur in RCTs conducted in livestock populations. In response to these concerns, standardized guidelines for reporting RCTs were developed and implemented in human medicine. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was first published in 1996 with a revised edition published in 2001. The CONSORT statement consists of a 22-item checklist for reporting a RCT and a flow diagram to follow the number of participants at each stage of a trial. An explanation and elaboration document not only defines and discusses the importance of each of the items, but also provides examples of how this information could be supplied in a publication. Differences between human and livestock populations necessitate modifications to the CONSORT statement to maximize its usefulness for RCTs involving livestock. These have been addressed in an extension of the CONSORT statement titled the REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized control trials for livestock and food safety. The modifications made for livestock trials specifically addressed the common use of group housing and group allocation to intervention in livestock studies, the use of a deliberate challenge model in some trials, and common use of non-clinical outcomes, such as contamination with a foodborne pathogen. In addition, the REFLECT statement for RCTs in livestock populations proposed specific terms or further clarified terms as they pertained to livestock studies.

The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety.

The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health, and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A two-day consensus meeting was held on November 18-19, 2008 in Chicago, Ill, United States of America, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors, and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety (LFS) and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist, and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes.

The REFLECT statement: reporting guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration.

Concerns about the completeness and accuracy of reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the impact of poor reporting on decision making have been documented in the medical field over the past several decades. Experience from RCTs in human medicine would suggest that failure to report critical trial features can be associated with biased estimated effect measures, and there is evidence to suggest that similar biases occur in RCTs conducted in livestock populations. In response to these concerns, standardized guidelines for reporting RCTs were developed and implemented in human medicine. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was first published in 1996, with a revised edition published in 2001. The CONSORT statement consists of a 22-item checklist for reporting a RCT and a flow diagram to follow the number of participants at each stage of a trial. An explanation and elaboration document not only defines and discusses the importance of each of the items, but also provides examples of how this information could be supplied in a publication. Differences between human and livestock populations necessitate modifications to the CONSORT statement to maximize its usefulness for RCTs involving livestock. These have been addressed in an extension of the CONSORT statement titled the REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized control trials for livestock and food safety. The modifications made for livestock trials specifically addressed the common use of group housing and group allocation to intervention in livestock studies; the use of deliberate challenge models in some trials and the common use of non-clinical outcomes, such as contamination with a foodborne pathogen. In addition, the REFLECT statement for RCTs in livestock populations proposed specific terms or further clarified terms as they pertained to livestock studies.

The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the CONSORT statement.

The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A 2-day consensus meeting was held on 18-19 November 2008 in Chicago, IL, USA, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock-production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health and food-safety outcomes.

The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety.

The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health, and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A two-day consensus meeting was held on November 18-19, 2008 in Chicago, IL, United States of America, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock-production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors, and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines For Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety (LFS) and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist, and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes.

Antilisterial activity and consumer acceptance of irradiated chicken breast meat vacuum-infused with grape seed and green tea extracts and tartaric acid.

Contamination of poultry with pathogenic bacteria contributes to human foodborne disease, causes damage to industry brand names, and has a significant economic impact on the food industry in the form of both damage to industry brand names and losses associated with recalls. Irradiation is a safe and effective means of decontaminating poultry products, but the maximum dose strengths allowed negatively impact poultry sensory quality characteristics. The 1st objective of this study was to investigate the potential interactive inhibitory effects of natural antimicrobials as components of a vacuum-marination in addition to various dose levels of irradiation. Tartaric acid (TA) at 2 levels and grape seed (GS) and green tea (GT) extracts were combined, vacuum-infused into chicken breast fillets, and irradiated at 1, 2, and 3 kGy by electron beam irradiation. The 2nd objective was to use a consumer test group to evaluate TA and plant extract infusion into chicken breast fillets with and without irradiation at 2 kGy on overall impression, flavor, texture, appearance, and tenderness. The results showed that samples vacuum-infused with TA at 37.5 and 75.0 mM and irradiated at 1 kGy significantly reduced Listeria monocytogenes (L.m.) levels by 2 and 3 log CFU/g compared to the control after 12 d of refrigerated storage. Vacuum-infusion of TA at 37.5 and 75.0 mM at 2 and 3 kGy irradiation, reduced L.m. to near nondetectable levels. The addition of TA and GS and GT to chicken breast fillets with and without irradiation did not significantly impact consumer preference, tenderness, appearance, or flavor. The addition of tartaric acid and natural plant extracts to chicken marinades could contribute to the prevention of L.m. contamination.

The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety.

The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health, and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that might not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A 2-day consensus meeting was held on November 18-19, 2008 in Chicago, IL, to achieve the objective. Before the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors, and associate editors. Before the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items would need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist, and an additional subitem was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes.

Evaluation of nonpathogenic surrogate bacteria as process validation indicators for Salmonella enterica for selected antimicrobial treatments, cold storage, and fermentation in meat.

Prerigor lean and adipose beef carcass tissues were artificially inoculated individually with stationary-phase cultures of five nonpathogenic Escherichia coli cultures that had been previously identified as surrogates for E. coli O157:H7 or a mixture of five Salmonella strains in a fecal inoculum. Each tissue sample was processed with microbial interventions comparable with those used in the meat industry. The log reductions of the E. coli isolates were generally not statistically different from the salmonellae inoculum within a specific treatment. Inoculation experiments were also conducted with ground beef stored at either 4 or -20 degrees C. When compared with the Salmonella inoculum, at least three of the five E. coli strains survived in a manner that was not statistically different from the salmonellae. The E. coli strains and the Salmonella mixed culture were also inoculated into summer sausage batter, and the population enumerated both before and after fermentation. Four of the E. coli strains showed a lower population reduction (higher survival) than the Salmonella mixed culture. The five nonpathogenic E. coli strains may be used as individually or collectively for specific process validation indicators for Salmonella.

Identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 meat processing indicators for fresh meat through comparison of the effects of selected antimicrobial interventions.

Fresh meat products can become contaminated with the pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the slaughter process; therefore, an E. coli O157:H7 indicator to verify the effectiveness of process controls in slaughter establishments would be extremely useful. The hides of 20 beef cattle were sampled, and 113 bacterial isolates were obtained. Thirteen of these isolates representing four genera, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Providencia, and Serratia, were selected based on growth and biochemical characteristics similar to those of five clinical strains of E. coli O157:H7. The temperature sensitivity was determined for the individual isolates and the five E. coli O157:H7 strains at 55 and 65 degrees C. D65-values for all 13 isolates were not significantly different from D65-values of the E. coli O157:H7 strains. E. coli isolates were the only isolates whose D55-values were not significantly different from those of the E. coli O157:H7 strains. E. coli isolates P3 and P68 were more resistant to the effects of 55 degrees C than were the other E. coli isolates but were not significantly different from E. coli O157:H7 WS 3331 (P > 0.05). The remaining E. coli isolates (P1, P8, and P14) were not significantly different from E. coli O157:H7 strains ATCC 35150, ATCC 43894, ATCC 43895, and WS 3062 (P > 0.05). Prerigor lean and adipose beef carcass tissue was artificially contaminated with stationary-phase cultures of the five E. coli beef cattle isolates or a cocktail of five E. coli O157:H7 strains in a fecal inoculum. Each tissue sample was processed with the following microbial interventions: 90 degrees C water; 90 degrees C water followed by 55 degrees C 2% lactic acid; 90 degrees C water followed by 20 degrees C 2% lactic acid; 20 degrees C water followed by 20 degrees C 2% lactic acid; 20 degrees C water followed by 20 degrees C 20 ppm chlorine; and 20 degrees C water followed by 20 degrees C 10% trisodium phosphate. The appropriateness of the E. coli isolates as potential E. coli O157:H7 indicators was dependent upon the microbial intervention utilized. For all microbial intervention methods applied irrespective of tissue type, the mean log reductions of at least two E. coli isolates were not significantly different from the mean log reduction of the E. coli O157:H7 cocktail (P > 0.05). Because of the frequent employment of multiple microbial interventions in the cattle industry, no single isolate can realistically represent the effectiveness of all microbial interventions for reduction of E. coil O157:H7. Thus, the use of a combination of E. coli isolates may be required to accurately predict the effectiveness of microbial intervention methods on the reduction of E. coli O157:H7 in beef carcass tissue.

Combining pediocin (ALTA 2341) with postpackaging thermal pasteurization for control of Listeria monocytogenes on frankfurters.

Frankfurters packaged in 1-link, 5-link, or 10-link packages were surface-inoculated with a five-strain mixture of Listeria monocytogenes (3.40 or 5.20 log CFU/g) after treatments with 3,000 arbitrary units (AU) or 6,000 AU pediocin (in ALTA 2341) per link. The frankfurters were vacuum packaged, after which the packages were heated in hot water at 71, 81, or 96 degrees C for 30, 60, or 120 s. L. monocytogenes was enumerated following the treatments. Selected treatments were subsequently evaluated during storage at 4, 10, and 25 degrees C for up to 12 weeks. L. monocytogenes was reduced by all treatments, but 81 degrees C or more for at least 60 s in combination with pediocin (Pdn-6000) was necessary to achieve a 50% reduction of initial inoculations. Heat treatments were most effective for 1-link packages and least effective for 10-link packages. Little or no growth of L. monocytogenes occurred on frankfurters for 12 weeks at 4 or 10 degrees C, and for 12 days at 25 degrees C. Generally, the treatments mentioned above did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect the sensory qualities of frankfurters. Therefore, pediocin (in ALTA 2341) in combination with postpackaging thermal treatment offers an effective treatment combination for improved control of L. monocytogenes on frankfurters.

Combining pediocin with postpackaging irradiation for control of Listeria monocytogenes on frankfurters.

Frankfurters, in 1-link, 5-link, or 10-link packages, were surface inoculated with a five-strain mixture of Listeria monocytogenes (3.40 or 5.20 log CFU/g) after treatment with 3,000 arbitrary units (AU) or 6,000 AU of pediocin (in ALTA 2341) per link. The frankfurters were vacuum packaged, after which the 1-link and 5-link packages were irradiated at 1.2 or 2.3 kGy and the 10-link packages were irradiated at 1.4 or 3.5 kGy. L. monocytogenes was enumerated following the treatments. Selected treatments were subsequently evaluated during storage at 4, 10, and 25 degrees C for up to 12 weeks. Combination of pediocin with postpackaging irradiation at 1.2 kGy or more was necessary to achieve a 50% reduction of L. monocytogenes on frankfurters in 1-link or 5-link packages. The combination of 6,000 AU of pediocin and irradiation at 2.3 kGy or more was effective in all package sizes for inhibition of the pathogen for 12 weeks at 4 or 10 degrees C. There was a synergistic effect between pediocin and irradiation for inhibition of L. monocytogenes. Storage at 4 degrees C enhanced the antilisterial effects of the treatment combinations, with little or no growth of the pathogen in 1-link or 5-link packages during 12 weeks of storage. In general, these treatments did not affect the sensory quality of frankfurters.

Survival of Listeria monocytogenes in a simulated recirculating brine chiller system.

Contamination by Listeria monocytogenes of processed meats after cooking presents a significant food safety risk. The purpose of this study was to determine the survival of L. monocytogenes in a simulated recirculating brine chiller system using pH values of 5, 6, and 7 with free chlorine concentrations of 0, 3, 5, and 10 ppm in 20% salt brine at -12 degrees C. At pH values of 5, 6, and 7 with chlorine concentrations of 2 and 3 ppm, using 10(8) CFU in a test tube system, an immediate drop of 0.28 log CFU/ml with no significance between treatments (P > 0.05), followed by a steady survival phase with a slope close to 0, was observed. In brine at a pH of 5 with 5 and 10 ppm of chlorine, an initial drop of 0.8 log CFU/ml was observed, which was followed by a steady survival phase with a destruction slope close to zero. At an inoculation concentration of 10(2) CFU in a test tube system (pH values of 5 and 7 with 0 and 10 ppm of chlorine), the average initial drop for all treatments was 0.1 log CFU/ml, which was followed by a steady survival phase. In a recirculating system, very few cells were destroyed during the brine chilling process, but only low numbers of L. monocytogenes were recovered from the brine and uninoculated hot dogs. Although little destruction of L. monocytogenes was noted, the dilution effect observed during the study indicates that environmental contamination of a brine chiller system poses little danger of postcooking contamination for processed meats if the system is regularly cleaned and sanitized.

A predictive model to determine the effects of temperature, sodium pyrophosphate, and sodium chloride on thermal inactivation of starved Listeria monocytogenes in pork slurry.

The effects and interactions of 27 combinations of heating temperature (57.5 to 62.5 degrees C), sodium pyrophosphate (SPP) level (0 to 0.5%, wt/vol), and salt (NaCl) level (0 to 6%, wt/vol) on the thermal inactivation of starved Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19116 in pork slurry were investigated. A split-split plot experimental design was used to compare all 27 combinations. L. monocytogenes survivors were enumerated on tryptic soy agar supplemented with 0.6% yeast extract. The natural logarithm (loge) of the means of decimal reduction times (D-values) were modeled as a function of temperature, SPP level, and NaCl level. Increasing concentrations of SPP or NaCl protected starved L. monocytogenes from the destructive effect of heat. For example, D-values for the pathogen at 57.5 degrees C in pork slurry with 0, 3, and 6% NaCl were 2.79, 7.75, and 14.59 min, respectively. All three variables interacted to affect the thermal inactivation of L. monocytogenes. A mathematical model describing the combined effect of temperature, SPP level, and NaCl level on the thermal inactivation of starved L. monocytogenes was developed. There was strong correlation (R2 = 0.97) between loge D-values predicted by the model and those observed experimentally. The model can predict D-values for any combination of variables that falls within the range of those tested. This predictive model can be used to assist food processors in designing thermal processes that include an adequate margin of safety for the control of L. monocytogenes in processed meats.

Destruction of Bacillus anthracis strain Sterne 34F2 spores in postal envelopes by exposure to electron beam irradiation.

AIMS: To determine the irradiation dose necessary to reduce the populations of Bacillus anthracis spores in a dry medium in postal envelopes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bacillus anthracis Sterne 34F2 spores were dispersed in non-fat dry milk and then placed into standard business postal envelopes. The spores were treated with a sequence of irradiation doses to determine the decimal reduction value (D10) in kiloGrays (kGy). The average D10 value was 3.35 +/- 0.02 kGy. CONCLUSIONS: An irradiation dose of 40.2 kGy would be required to result in a process equivalent to the thermal canning process (12 D10 reduction) to eliminate Clostridium botulinum spores. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Irradiation is an effective means of reducing or eliminating B. anthracis spores in a dry medium in postal envelopes.

Impact of pH enhancement on populations of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in boneless lean beef trimmings.

Boneless lean beef trimmings were inoculated with multiple strains of salmonellae, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 at levels of ca. 6 log10 CFU/g. pH enhancement with ammonia gas was then used to increase the pH of the trimmings to ca. 9.6. The product was then frozen, chipped, and compressed into blocks. pH enhancement reduced the populations of salmonellae, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli O157:H7 by approximately 4, 3, and 1 log10 cycles, respectively. After the product had been frozen and compressed into blocks, no salmonellae or E. coli O157:H7 were detectable by enumeration or after enrichment and isolation. The final populations of L. monocytogenes were reduced by ca. 3 log10 cycles relative to the initial populations. When uninoculated pH-enhanced lean boneless trimmings were blended with inoculated ground beef to a final concentration of 15% (wt/wt), pathogen populations in the ground beef were reduced by approximately 0.2 log10 cycles.

Storage and packaging effects on sensory and color characteristics of ground beef.

Effects of irradiation (2 kGy) of ground beef patties from trimmings stored aerobically for 0 or 6 days on lean color, odor, and sensory attributes were investigated. Beef trimings were coarse ground and split into 2 groups. Group one was fine ground, pattied, and packaged immediately; group-two was stored 6 days then fine ground, pattied, and packaged. Irradiated beef patties had greater (P<0.05) off-odors, and off-flavors, lower (P<0.05) CIE L(∗), a(∗) and b(∗) and saturation indexes values (P<0.05) after four days of storage at 0±1 °C. Irradiation of patties produced from trimmings aged an extra 6 days resulted in increased (P<0.05) saturation indexes and b(∗) values, but not off-odors when compared to non-aged and irradiated patties. Thus, the production of irradiated beef patties should utilize beef trimmings with the shortest postmortem aging time and a dose of less than 2 kGy to minimize discoloration and off-odors.