Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT. Methods and Materials: Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED10), LC, and toxicity incidence. Results: Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED10 was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy10 increase in BED10 associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts. Conclusions: SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics.

Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery in the Management of Optic Nerve Sheath Meningiomas: An International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twenty Studies.

BACKGROUND: Optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONMs) are often managed with radiotherapy (RT) with the goal of achieving radiographic local control (LC) and preventing deterioration of visual acuity (VA). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for patients with ONM treated with RT. METHODS: The PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection criteria were used to identify studies. Primary outcomes were stable or improved VA and radiographic LC at last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were incidences of radiation-induced retinopathy and xerophthalmia and stable or improved visual fields (VFs). Weighted random-effects meta-analyses using the DerSimonian and Laird methods were conducted to characterize effect sizes. Mixed-effects regression models were used to examine potential correlations between gross tumor volume (GTV) and outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 444 patients with ONM across 20 published studies were included. The estimated LC rate was 99.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.3%-100%), and the estimated proportion of patients with stable or improved VA or VF was 89.7% (95% CI, 86.2%-92.4%) and 93.3% (95% CI, 89.5%-95.8%), respectively. Estimated incidences of radiation-induced retinopathy and xerophthalmia were 7.2% and 10.1%, respectively. GTV was significantly associated with VA (P = 0.014) with estimated VA rates of 96.4%, 91.4%, and 80.5% for GTVs of 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RT was well tolerated, with excellent LC achieved. Nearly 90% of patients noted either stability or improvement in VA and VF. Larger ONMs were associated with poorer VA.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) are often treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to achieve complete obliteration (CO), prevent future hemorrhages, and ameliorate neurological symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To summarize outcomes after SRS for dAVFs and propose relevant practice recommendations. METHODS: Using a PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE protocol, we included patients with dAVFs treated with SRS and data for at least one of the outcomes of the study. Relevant outcomes were CO, symptom improvement and cure, and post-SRS hemorrhage or permanent neurological deficits (PNDs). Estimated outcome effect sizes were determined using weighted random-effects meta-analyses using DerSimonian and Laird methods. To assess potential relationships between patient and lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes, mixed-effects weighted regression models were used. RESULTS: Across 21 published studies, we identified 705 patients with 721 dAVFs treated with SRS. The CO rate was 68.6% (95% CI 60.7%-76.5%) with symptom improvement and cure rates of 97.2% (95% CI 93.2%-100%) and 78.8% (95% CI 69.3%-88.2%), respectively. Estimated incidences of post-SRS hemorrhage and PNDs were 1.1% (95% CI 0.6%-1.6%) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.8%-1.8%), respectively. Noncavernous sinus (NCS) dAVFs were associated with lower CO (P = .03) and symptom cure rates (P = .001). Higher grade was also associated with lower symptom cure rates (P = .04), whereas previous embolization was associated with higher symptom cure rates (P = .01). CONCLUSION: SRS for dAVFs results in CO in the majority of patients with excellent symptom improvement rates with minimal toxicity. Patients with NCS and/or higher-grade dAVFs have poorer symptom cure rates. Combined therapy with embolization and SRS is recommended when feasible for clinically aggressive dAVFs or those refractory to embolization to maximize the likelihood of symptom cure.

Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.

Objectives: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for patients with locally recurrent brain metastases treated with a repeat course of stereotactic radiosurgery (rSRS). Method: Primary outcomes were 1-year local control(LC) and radionecrosis (RN). Secondary outcomes were 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year distant brain control (DBC). Weighted random effects meta-analyses utilizing the DerSimonian and Laird methods were conducted to characterize summary effect sizes. Mixed effects regression models were utilized to analyze potential correlations between prognostic factors and outcomes. Results: In total, 347 patients with 462 brain metastases treated with rSRS were included. Estimated 1-year LC, OS, and DBC rates were 69.0% (95% CI: 61.0-77.0%), 49.7% (95% CI: 28.9-70.6%), and 41.6% (95% CI: 33.0-50.4%), respectively. The estimated RN rate was 16.1% (95% CI: 6.3-25.9%). Every 1 Gy increase in prescription dose was estimated to result in roughly 5% increase in 1-year LC (p = 0.14). Conclusions: rSRS was well-tolerated with reasonable 1-year LC and OS. Dose escalation may result in improved LC.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: an international systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes for patients with acromegaly treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Primary outcomes were 5- and 10-year endocrine remission (ER) and endocrine control (EC). Secondary outcomes were 10-year radiographic local control (LC), visual toxicity, and hypopituitarism rates. Weighted random effects meta-analyses using the DerSimonian and Laird methods were conducted to characterize and compare effect sizes. Mixed effects regression models were used to examine correlations between potential prognostic factors and primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 1533 patients across 20 published studies with acromegaly treated with SRS were included. At 5-years, estimated ER and EC rates were 43.2% (95% CI 31.7-54.6%) and 55.0% (95% CI 27.6-82.4%), respectively. At 10-years, estimated ER and EC rates were 56.9% (95% CI 47.5-66.4%) and 69.7% (95% CI 47.7-91.8%), respectively. The estimated 10-year LC rate was 92.8% (95% CI 83.0-100%). Visual toxicity and hypopituitarism following SRS were estimated to be 2.7% (95% CI 1.3-4.2%) and 26.8% (95% CI 16.9-36.7%), respectively. Every 1 Gy increase in margin prescription dose beyond 17 Gy was estimated to result in a 0.41% increased risk of visual toxicity (p = 0.03). No prognostic factors were associated with EC, ER, LC, or hypopituitarism. CONCLUSIONS: SRS was well-tolerated in the management of pituitary acromegaly resulting in gradually improving ER and EC rates over time that approached 60% and 70%. SRS-related visual loss is an uncommon treatment-related side effect, and patient-specific clinical decision making remains critical.