Plasma Sequencing for Patients with GIST-Limitations and Opportunities in an Academic Setting.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in GIST is of interest for the detection of heterogeneous resistance mutations and treatment monitoring. However, methodologies for use in a local setting are not standardized and are error-prone and difficult to interpret. We established a workflow to evaluate routine tumor tissue NGS (Illumina-based next generation sequencing) panels and pipelines for ctDNA sequencing in an academic setting. Regular blood collection (Sarstedt) EDTA tubes were sufficient for direct processing whereas specialized tubes (STRECK) were better for transportation. Mutation detection rate was higher in automatically extracted (AE) than manually extracted (ME) samples. Sensitivity and specificity for specific mutation detection was higher using digital droplet (dd)PCR compared to NGS. In a retrospective analysis of NGS and clinical data (133 samples from 38 patients), cfDNA concentration correlated with tumor load and mutation detection. A clinical routine pipeline and a novel research pipeline yielded different results, but known and resistance-mediating mutations were detected by both and correlated with the resistance spectrum of TKIs used. In conclusion, NGS routine panel analysis was not sensitive and specific enough to replace solid biopsies in GIST. However, more precise methods (hybridization capture NGS, ddPCR) may comprise important research tools to investigate resistance. Future clinical trials need to compare methodology and protocols.

Tropomyosin receptor kinases in sarcomas - of joy and despair.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The relatively recent discovery of neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene arrangements as pan-tumor predictive biomarkers has led to impressive novel treatments for patients with TRK fusions. Although the number of patients who qualify for treatment is vanishingly small for cancer patients in general, a few histological subsets of sarcomas exhibit NTRK fusions more commonly leading to large expectations within the sarcoma community. RECENT FINDINGS: Larotrectenib and entrectenib have recently been approved based on durable responses in TRK positive cancers with nonresectable or metastatic disease, including many sarcomas. Identification of resistance mutations to TRKi has led to the development of novel salvage therapies which may soon further expand the armamentarium of treatments. The greatest barrier and frustration to date is the actual identification of patients who harbor the fusion. The dimension of rarity in sarcomas remains difficult to comprehend for both patients and caregivers. Diagnosis of NTRK fusions is complex, particularly in the context of sarcomas and can involve immunohistochemistry as a screening tool but frequently requires fluorescence-in-situ hybridization or next-generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm the diagnosis. SUMMARY: The growing evidence on subtype-specific incidence of NTRK fusions will help to improve strategic prioritization or exclusion of subtypes to reduce the burden of negative testing. Next-generation inhibitors provide potential salvage treatment options for patients failing first-line therapy.