An Online Investigation Into Direct-to-Consumer Men's Health Clinics: The Who, What, and Where.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize direct-to-consumer (DTC) men's health clinics by reviewing their online content. Increasing numbers of patients are seeking treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) and hypogonadism from DTC "men's health" clinics. Treatments are often used off-label, with lack of transparency of provider credentials and qualifications. METHODS: We identified DTC Men's Health Clinics in the United States by internet search by state using the terms, "Men's Health Clinic," and "Low T Center." All stand-alone clinics were reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-three clinics were reviewed, with 147 (65.9%) offered ED treatments and 196 (87.9%) offering testosterone replacement, and 120 (53.8%) offering both ED treatment and testosterone replacement. Of those clinics offering ED treatments, 93 (63.3%) advertised shockwave therapy and 84 (57.1%) PRP therapy. There were 56 (38%) who offered shockwave therapy and PRP. ICI was significantly more likely to be offered if there was a urologist on staff (p <.001). Clinic providers represented 20 different medical and alternative medicine specialties. Internal medicine was most common (17.4%), followed by family medicine (11.1%). A nonphysician (nurse practitioner or physician assistant) was listed as the primary provider in 10 clinics (4.5%) and 45 clinics (20.1%) did not list their providers. Urologists were listed as the primary provider in 10.3% of clinics. A naturopathic provider was listed as a staff member in 22 (11.6%) of clinics. CONCLUSION: There is significant heterogeneity and misinformation available to the public regarding men's health. Familiarity with and insight into practice patterns of "men's health" clinics will help provide informed patient care and counseling.

Vasectomy Regret Among Childless Men.

OBJECTIVE: To address historical concerns surrounding vasectomy in childless men, we sought to evaluate for the level of regret in this unique cohort. METHODS: The records of patients who underwent vasectomy via single surgeon between 2006 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and those who had not fathered children in any capacity at time of vasectomy were selected. We devised a 6-question survey inquiring about regret and thoughts on vasectomy reversal and assisted reproductive technology (ART). The questions are listed in Table 1. Patients were queried via a telephone call to rate their level of regret, both immediately after vasectomy and present day. The cohort was analyzed via age at time of vasectomy, time since vasectomy and marital status. RESULTS: There were 4812 overall patients who underwent vasectomy in this interval, with 205 (4.3%) who were childless. The response rate was 33.2% (68/205). Average age was 36.6 years with average time since vasectomy at time of phone call was 5.51 years. Regret rate was 4.4% immediately following vasectomy and 7.4% at time of telephone interview. A confirmatory, second consultation before vasectomy was present in 6.8% (14/205). The majority of patients 150/205 (73.1%) were married. When patients were stratified by marital status, there was no significant difference in any of the questions. The majority of patients were satisfied with their decision, with few contemplating or pursuing reversal or ART (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Regret in childless patients who undergo vasectomy is very rare, with the majority of patients feeling that their life was improved.

Plication for Correction of Congenital Penile Curvature: With or Without Degloving?

INTRODUCTION: Previously, incisionless plication (IP) for correction of congenital penile curvature (CPC) has been performed after penile degloving via a circumscribing incision. AIM: To describe our experience with non-degloving incisionless penile plication (NDIP) for correction of CPC and compare these outcomes with those of men who underwent degloving incisionless penile plication (DIP). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of men ≤ 45 years of age who underwent incisionless penile plication for correction of CPC between 2008 and 2020 at two adult tertiary hospitals. Patients underwent either NDIP, performed through a 2-3 cm longitudinal incision along the proximal-to-mid shaft opposite the point of maximum penile curvature, or DIP via a sub-coronal circumscribing incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the non-degloving and degloving groups. RESULTS: Among the 38 men (mean age, 26 years) who met the inclusion criteria, 25 underwent NDIP, including 6 patients with biplanar curvature (2 Ventral, 4 Dorsal, 6 Lateral). Thirteen patients underwent DIP, including 1 patient with biplanar curvature (1 ventral, 1 lateral). Curvature reduction was 50 ± 23 degrees for the NDIP group and 36 ± 10 degrees for the DIP group (P = .04). Five (20%) patients in the NDIP group and nine (69%) patients in the DIP group experienced a reduction in stretched penile length following plication (SPL) (P = .01). One patient in the NDIP group underwent an additional plication for recurrent curvature. CONCLUSION: Both NDIP and DIP are safe and highly efficacious techniques for the correction of CPC. Kusin SB, Khouri RK, Dropkin BM, et al., Plication for Correction of Congenital Penile Curvature: With or Without Degloving?. Sex Med 2021;9:100462.

Is mesenteric defect closure needed in urologic surgery using ileum?

INTRODUCTION: Classic surgical teaching advocates for closure of the mesenteric defect (MD) after bowel anastomosis but the necessity is controversial. We sought to evaluate the necessity of MD closure at the time of harvest of ileum for genitourinary reconstructive surgery (GURS) by analyzing the incidence of early and late gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAE) in patients with and without MD closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing urologic reconstruction with ileum to identify incidence of ileus, small bowel obstruction (SBO), gastrointestinal (GI) fistula and stoma complications. Patient and procedure variables were analyzed to identify risk factors for GIAE. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients met inclusion criteria and 93% of GURS was for urinary diversion following cystectomy. MD was closed in 194 cases (67%). Median follow up was 19 months. Early (< 30 day) GIAE rates were 16.5% (n = 32) and 21.3% (n = 20) in the closure and non-closure groups, respectively (p = 0.22). The rate of early ileus/SBO requiring nasogastric tube decompression or laparotomy were similar after closure (15.0%) and non-closure (21.3%) (p = .18). The late GIAE rates were 5.7% (n = 11) and 6.4% (n = 6) in the closure and non-closure cohorts, respectively (p = 0.56). The rate of late SBO were similar and no cases of early or late SBO in either cohort were due to internal herniation. On multivariate analysis, increasing BMI was associated with both early and late GIAE. CONCLUSIONS: After harvesting ileum for urologic reconstruction, the MD can safely be left open as we found no association between non-closure and early or late GIAE..

Polyisobutylene Urolithiasis Due to Ileal Conduit Urostomy Appliance: An Index Case.

Polyisobutylene (PIB) is a synthetic elastomer that is a component of sealants, adhesives, and chewing gum base. We report a case of bilateral PIB urolithiasis in a patient with an ileal conduit urinary diversion due to neurogenic bladder from spinal cord injury. Infrared spectroscopy confirmed the composition of bilateral stones and adhesive from the patient's urostomy appliance to be PIB. No previous cases of PIB urolithiasis are reported in the literature.