Bluetooth Noise-Canceling Headphones Improve the Quality of Ophthalmic Exams in Patients With Hearing Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This study tests the utilization of Bluetooth noise-canceling headphones in improving the quality of eye exams in patients with hearing loss. This prospective study was approved on ethical standards by the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Institutional Review Board (Approval No. 22-0079) and registered with the National Institutes of Health (NCT05420038). METHODS: UTMB patients above 55 years of age were screened for hearing loss using soundcheck audiometry. Twenty-nine subjects answered pre-recorded ophthalmic exam questions that solicited precise responses. As controls, subjects were randomly administered half of the questions via headphones and half via a smartphone at normal speech volume (60 decibels). Points were awarded for responses demonstrating comprehension, and a post-exam survey was collected. RESULTS: Collectively, the mean score was 1.79 with headphones versus 0.96 with control on the Amsler grid segment and 1.90 with headphones versus 0.97 with control on education questions (p=0.001). Between red zone and yellow zone hearing loss patients, the more severe red zone group answered significantly better in both Amsler (1.78 versus 0.50; p=0.0003) and education questions (1.88 versus 0.44; p<0.0001) with headphones. The yellow zone group answered better with headphones overall but failed to reach significance. Post-exam survey indicated that 28 of 29 patients (97%) preferred the headphones during ophthalmic exams. CONCLUSION: Patients with hearing loss demonstrated better comprehension with Bluetooth headphones. These low-cost devices show great promise at improving effective, compassionate communication between providers and hearing loss patients.

Factors associated with longer survival among older medicare patients after diagnosis of supratentorial primary brain malignancies: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite recent advances, the prognosis for primary malignant brain tumors (PMBTs) remains poor. Some commonly prescribed medications may exhibit anti-tumor properties in various cancers, and neurodegenerative diseases may activate pathways that counteract gliomagenesis. Our study is focused on determining if there is a correlation between the use of metformin, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or the presence of Parkinson's disease (PD), and the survival rates following a diagnosis of a PMBT. METHODS: This analysis of the 100% Texas Medicare Database identified patients aged 66+ years diagnosed with a supratentorial PMBT from 2014-2017. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to analyze survival following diagnosis and associations of survival with surgical intervention, radiation, PD diagnosis, and prescription of metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs. RESULTS: There were 1,943 patients who met study criteria, and the median age was 74 years. When medication utilization was stratified by none, pre-diagnosis only, post-diagnosis only, or both pre- and post-diagnosis (continuous), continuous utilization of metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with prolonged survival compared to no utilization (hazard ratio [HR]:0.45, 95% CI:0.33-0.62; HR:0.71. 95% CI:0.59-0.86; HR:0.59, 95% CI:0.48-0.72; and HR:0.45, 95% CI:0.35-0.58 respectively). PD was also associated with longer survival (HR:0.59-0.63 across the four models). DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, ARBs, and comorbid PD are associated with a survival benefit among geriatric Medicare patients with supratentorial PMBTs.

Effects of treatment methods on cutaneous melanoma related mortality and all-cause mortality in Texas: TCR-Medicare 2007-2017 database.

PURPOSE: The incidence of cutaneous melanoma is rising, and Melanoma related deaths are highest among people aged 65-74. Herein, we aim to understand the impact of novel and established melanoma treatment methods on CM related mortality and all-cause mortality. We further compared these effects among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). METHODS: The data was extracted from the Texas Cancer Registry from 2007 to 2017. A Cox Proportional Hazard regression analysis was performed to assess treatment effect on melanoma mortality and all-cause mortality, with race-ethnicity as an effect modifier. RESULTS: A higher percentage of Hispanic patients presented with CM-related mortality (22.11%) compared to NHW patients (14.39%). In both the Hispanic and NHW, post-diagnosis radiation (HR = 1.610, 95% CI 0.984-2.634, HR = 2.348, 95% CI 2.082-2.648, respectively), post-diagnosis chemotherapy (HR = 1.899, 95% CI 1.085-3.322, HR = 2.035, 95% CI 1.664-2.489, respectively), and post-diagnosis immunotherapy (HR = 2.100, 95% CI 1.338-3.296, HR = 2.402, 95% CI 2.100-2.748) are each associated with an increased risk in CM-related mortality. Similar results were seen with post-diagnosis radiation (Hispanic HR = 1.640, 95% CI 1.121-2.400, NHW HR = 1.800, 95% CI 1.644-1.971), post-diagnostic chemotherapy (Hispanic HR = 1.457, 95% CI 0.898-2.364, NHW HR = 1.592, 95% CI 1.356-1.869), and post-diagnosis immunotherapy (Hispanic HR = 2.140, 95% CI 1.494-3.065, NHW HR = 2.190, 95% CI 1.969-2.435) with respect to all-cause mortality. Post-diagnosis surgery (HR = 0.581, 95% CI 0.395-0.856, HR = 0.622, 95% CI 0.571-0.678) had the opposite effect in CM-related mortality for Hispanics and NHWs respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results propose differences in all-cause and CM-only related mortality with separate treatment modalities, particularly with chemotherapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapy. In addition, this retrospective cohort study showed that health disparities exist in the Hispanic Medicare population of Texas with CM.

Outcomes of Medicare-covered diabetes self-management training for cancer survivors with diabetes.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the impact of utilization of the Medicare-covered Diabetes Self-Management Training (DSMT) on the likelihood of receiving preventive care and on outcomes among cancer survivors with diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 1999-2019 Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare linkage data for beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate, colorectal, or breast cancer for ≥5 years. We used propensity score matching to estimate the beneficiaries' probability of receiving DSMT and matched it with non-users. The observed DSMT outcomes were hospitalization, ER visit, eye exam, HbA1c test, foot exam, nephropathy, and all-cause mortality. DSMT utilization was set at attending 1, 2, and 3 or more sessions. Conditional Cox proportional hazard regression was built to determine the association between DSMT use and each respective outcome, unadjusted and adjusted for patients' covariates. RESULTS: A total of 79,271 beneficiaries (65% had diabetes-related complications, and 41% were either prostate or breast cancer survivors) were included. We found that (1) DSMT users had more eye exams (HR=1.27), HbA1c tests (HR=1.47), foot exams (HR=1.21), and nephropathy visits (HR=1.11), and less hospitalization (HR=0.86) and overall mortality (HR=0.70) (p≤0.01 each vs. non-users); (2) among DSMT users, 56% attended one session, 24% attended 2 sessions, and 20% attended 3 or more sessions; (3) attending 2 or ≥3 DSMT sessions was associated with more eye exams (HR=1.14), HbA1c tests (HR=1.12), and foot exams (HR=1.24). CONCLUSIONS: DSMT is instrumental to preventing or delaying complications of diabetes in cancer survivors and reducing their overall mortality. The findings may inform future efforts to promote the value of DSMT for cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Medicare-covered DSMT offers a great value to cancer survivors with diabetes.

Association of Medication-Assisted Therapy and Risk of Drug Overdose-Related Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visits in Patients With Opioid Use Disorder.

Objective To examine the differential impacts of medication-assisted therapy (MAT) medications (naltrexone, methadone, and buprenorphine) on drug overdose-related hospitalizations or emergency room (ER) visits in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients 18 years or older diagnosed with OUD, using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database. To ensure a new diagnosis of OUD from 2018 to 2019, each patient required one year of continuous enrollment before OUD diagnosis. The primary outcome was the incidence of drug overdose-related hospitalization or ER visits in the follow-up period. Patients were censored at loss of coverage or end of the study (9/30/2020). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was built to compare the outcomes across three MAT medications (buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone). Results Only 10.38% of the 145,317 OUD patients received MAT prescriptions in the 12 months after diagnosis. The majority of MAT users (77.8%) received buprenorphine. At one year of follow-up, the incidence of drug overdose-related hospitalization or ER visits varied by MAT drug type: naltrexone (14.26%), methadone (12.26%), and buprenorphine (10.23%). Compared to methadone drug users, buprenorphine users had a lower risk of negative outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.97). Conclusion Buprenorphine was associated with the lowest risk of drug overdose-related hospitalization or ER visits among the MAT drugs. However, only 10.38% of OUD patients received MAT. Increasing MAT availability to patients with OUD is a key step toward preventing relapse and reducing adverse health outcomes.

Utilization of diabetes self-management program among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: Using 2006-2019 Texas Medicare data.

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment is associated with inferior health outcomes such as diabetes. Medicare provides Diabetes Self-Management Training (DSMT) program to beneficiaries to achieve normal metabolic control and reduce the risk of micro and macro-vascular complications. This study aimed to examine the trend of DSMT utilization among cancer survivors and assess individual characteristics associated with it. METHODS: The data for this study was from Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare linkage data of patients with prostate, breast, or colorectal cancer diagnosed in 1999-2017. Outcome variables include the number of first-time DSMT users, the number of total users, and the average number of DSMT utilization in minutes. We performed logistic regression and gamma regression to obtain a multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for the association between DSMT utilization and individual characteristics. RESULTS: The number of first-time users has slowly increased over the years (from 99 to 769 per 1,000) but suddenly dropped after 2016. The number of all users (first-time and follow-up users) has increased (from 123 to 1,201 per 1,000) and plateaued after 2016. Determinants including Hispanic ethnicity (O.R. = 1.10) and Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility (O.R. = 1.25) are positively associated with both the initiation and retention of the DSMT. A barrier to both initiation and retention of DSMT is living in a metropolitan area (O.R. = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-level strategies to enhance accessibility and availability of DSMT programs for Medicare beneficiaries are highly recommended. Examining the determinants of initiation and retention of DSMT over 14 years provides insights on strategies to meet the needs of cancer survivors and reduce the burden of diabetes on them.

Pre-Diagnosis Pain in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Signals the Need for Aggressive Symptom Management.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impact of pancreatic cancer (PC) pain on associated symptoms, activities, and resource utilization from 2016 to 2020 in an online patient registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Responses from PC patient volunteers (N = 1978) were analyzed from online surveys in a cross-sectional study. Comparisons were performed between PC patient groups reporting, (1) the presence vs. absence of pre-diagnosis PC pain, (2) high (4-8) vs. low (0-3) pain intensity scores on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), and (3) year of PC diagnosis (2010-2020). Descriptive statistics and all bivariate analyses were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's Exact tests. RESULTS: PC pain was the most frequently reported pre-diagnosis symptom (62%). Pre-diagnostic PC pain was reported more frequently by women, those with a younger age at diagnosis, and those with PC that spread to the liver and peritoneum. Those with pre-diagnostic PC pain vs. those without reported higher pain intensities (2.64 ± 2.54 vs.1.56 ± 2.01 NRS mean ± SD, respectively, P = .0039); increased frequencies of post-diagnosis symptoms of cramping after meals, feelings of indigestion, and weight loss (P = .02-.0001); and increased resource utilization in PC pain management: (ER visits N = 86 vs. N = 6, P = .018 and analgesic prescriptions, P < .03). The frequency of high pain intensity scores was not decreased over a recent 11-year span. CONCLUSIONS: PC pain continues to be a prominent PC symptom. Patients reporting pre-diagnosis PC pain experience increased GI metastasis, symptoms burden, and are often undertreated. Its mitigation may require novel treatments, more resources dedicated to ongoing pain management and surveillance to improve outcomes.

Disparities in Late-Stage Breast and Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Among Hispanic, Non-Hispanic White, and Non-Hispanic Black Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study of Texas Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in late-stage breast or colorectal cancer diagnosis in younger populations are associated with social determinants of health (SDOH; education, poverty, housing, employment). We hypothesized that, in older Medicare beneficiaries, disparities in late-stage cancer diagnosis between Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients would be associated with SDOH, comorbidities, and primary care physician (PCP) access. METHODS: We analyzed 2005-2017 Texas Cancer Registry data linked with Medicare data for patients aged ≥ 66 (n = 86,501). Variables included age at diagnosis, sex, comorbidities, poverty level, education, PCP, and relevant cancer screening within 1 year. RESULTS: For breast cancer in women (Hispanic, n = 6380; NHW, n = 39,225; NHB, n = 4055), a fully adjusted model showed significantly higher odds of late-stage cancer diagnosis only in NHB patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.22) compared with NHW; adjustment for comorbidities and SDOH partially decreased the odds of late-stage diagnosis relative to NHWs. Interaction terms between race-ethnicity and poverty were not significant. For colorectal cancer, a fully adjusted multivariate model showed significantly higher odds of late-stage diagnosis only among NHBs (n = 3318, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19-1.40) relative to NHWs (n = 27,470); adjustment for SDOH partially decreased the odds of late-stage diagnosis in NHB patients. Interaction terms between race-ethnicity and poverty were not significant. CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in late-stage breast and colorectal cancer diagnoses remain after adjustment for SDOH and clinically relevant factors, underscoring the need to optimize access to screening and timely cancer treatment in racial/ethnic minorities.

Association of Medication-Assisted Therapy with New Onset of Cardiac Arrhythmia in Patients Diagnosed with Opioid Use Disorders.

BACKGROUND: No data exist on comparative risk of cardiac arrhythmias among 3 Medication-Assisted Therapy (MAT) medications in patients with opioid use disorder. Understanding MAT medications with the least risk of arrhythmia can guide clinical decision-making. METHOD: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed of patients 18 years or older diagnosed with opioid use disorder by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modification without baseline arrhythmia in 2018-2019, using Clinformatics Data Mart Database (Optum, Eden Prairie, Minn). Everyone required 1 year of continuous enrollment prior to and after the diagnosis. Patients with MAT were propensity score-matched to those without MAT. Primary outcome was rate of arrhythmia across MAT (methadone, naltrexone, and buprenorphine). A multivariable logistic regression model was built to examine the outcome difference across 3 medications adjusted for patient's demographic and comorbidity. RESULT: Only 14.1% of the 66,083 patients with opioid use disorder received MAT prescriptions in the 12 months after diagnosis. New-onset arrhythmia diagnoses occur more frequently among MAT vs non-MAT users (4.86% vs 3.92%), with 29% risk of incident arrhythmias among MAT users, even after adjusting relevant confounders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.52). Incidence of arrhythmia varied by drugs: naltrexone (9.57%), methadone (5.71%), and buprenorphine (3.81%). Difference among the MAT drugs in incidence of arrhythmia remained significant even after adjusting covariates (aOR 2.44; 95% CI, 1.63-3.64 and buprenorphine aOR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00, with methadone as reference). CONCLUSION: MAT users had higher risk of cardiac arrhythmia than non-users. Naltrexone is associated with the highest risk of arrhythmia, suggesting caution with naltrexone use, especially in opioid use disorder patients with pre-existing heart conditions.