Can harmful lifestyle, obesity and weight changes increase the risk of breast cancer in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers? A Mini review.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 genes are associated with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer with a cumulative risk of 60% in BRCA 1 mutation carriers and of 30% in BRCA 2 mutation carriers. Several lifestyle factors could play a role in determining an individual's risk of breast cancer. Obesity, changes in body size or unhealthy lifestyle habits such as smoking, alcohol consumption and physical inactivity have been evaluated as possible determinants of breast cancer risk. The aim of this study was to explore the current understanding of the role of harmful lifestyle and obesity or weight change in the development of breast cancer in female carriers of BRCA 1/2 mutations. METHODS: Articles were identified from MEDLINE in October 2020 utilizing related keywords; they were then read and notes, study participants, measures, data analysis and results were used to write this review. RESULTS: Studies with very large case series have been carried out but only few of them have shown consistent results. Additional research would be beneficial to better determine the actual role and impact of such factors.

Assessing resilience of healthcare infrastructure exposed to COVID-19: emerging risks, resilience indicators, interdependencies and international standards.

In the moment of preparation of this paper, the world is still globally in grip of the Corona (COVID-19) crisis, and the need to understand the broader overall framework of the crisis increases. As in similar cases in the past, also with this one, the main interest is on the "first response". Fully appreciating the efforts of those risking their lives facing pandemics, this paper tries to identify the main elements of the larger, possibly global, framework, supported by international standards, needed to deal with new (emerging) risks resulting from threats like Corona and assess the resilience of systems affected. The paper proposes that future solutions should include a number of new elements, related to both risk and resilience. That should include broadening the scope of attention, currently focused onto preparation and response phases, to the phases of "understanding risks", including emerging risks, and transformation and adaptation. The paper suggests to use resilience indicators in this process. The proposed approach has been applied in different cases involving critical infrastructures in Europe (energy supply, water supply, transportation, etc., exposed to various threats), including the health system in Austria. The detailed, indicator-based, resilience analysis included mapping resilience, resilience stress-testing, visualization, etc., showing, already before the COVID-19, the resilience (stress-testing) limits of the infrastructures. A simpler (57 indicator based) analysis has, then been done for 11 countries (including Austria). The paper links these results with the options available in the area of policies, standards, guidelines and tools (such as the RiskRadar), with focus on interdependencies and global standards-especially the new ISO 31,050, linking emerging risks and resilience.

BRCA germline mutation test for all woman with ovarian cancer?

BACKGROUND: Delivering widespread BRCA testing to patients with ovarian cancer has been suggested by several scientists, recommended by professional societies and solicited by patients organizations. However, based on the lack of studies clearly demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of such approach compared to standard practice, we evaluated the possibility to better select subgroups of ovarian cancer (OC) patients with higher probability to be a BRCA mutation carrier'. METHODS: We analyzed the database of 2222 germline BRCA analyses from OC patients recently published by Song et al. (Song 2014) by applying multivariate and conditional inference regression tree-analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 178/2192 (8.1%) evaluable OC women showed pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA genes (84 BRCA1;94 BRCA2). BRCA mutations resulted significantly more frequent in Epithelial tumors (10.7%), less differentiated tumours (11.0%) and younger subjects (13.4%). Regression tree analysis permitted to individualize a subset of 66% OC patients with particularly low risk (3.5%) to carry a BRCA mutation vs a subgroup (24% of the series), with a probability higher than 17% to carry a pathogenic mutation. Younger age, OC and Breast Cancer family history were confirmed powerful factors in selecting subgroups of patients with significantly different BRCA mutation probability. CONCLUSIONS: Our regression tree-analysis can represent an innovative approach taking into consideration all main clinical pathological information to select OC patients to be candidated for BRCA test.

Hereditary and non-hereditary branches of family eligible for BRCA test: cancers in other sites.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of relationships of BRCA alterations with cancer at sites other than breast/ovary may provide innovative information concerning BRCA pathogenic role and support additional clinical decisions. Aim of this study is to compare presence of cancers in other sites in members of hereditary (H) and not-hereditary (nH) branches of families of patients eligible to BRCA test. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of cancer in other sites in members of 136 families eligible for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic counseling at Centro Studi Tumori Eredo-familiari of our Institute; we compared the frequency of other cancer types in 1156 members of the H-branch with respect to 1062 members of nH-Branch. The families belonging to a proband case and with informative members in at least three generation entered the present study. RESULTS: The frequency of other Cancers in members of H-branch was significantly higher than that in members of nH-branch (161 vs 75 cancers; p < 0.0001). In specific, members of H-branch had a significantly higher probability to have more lung cancer (38 vs 9;p < 0.0006), kidney cancer (23 vs 5;p < 0.0005), liver cancer (13 vs 3;p < 0.02) and larynx cancer (14 vs 4;p < 0.03). Interestingly, to belong to H-branch resulted significantly associated with a higher probability of lung cancer (OR 4.5; 2.15-9.38 95%C.I.), liver cancer (OR: 4.02; 1.14-14.15 95% C.I.) and larynx cancer (OR:3.4; 1.12-10.39 95%C.I.) independently from Gender and Age. CONCLUSIONS: Members belonging to the H-branch of families of patients eligible to BRCA test have a higher risk of tumors in lung, larynx and liver. Clinicians should consider the increased risk for these cancers to activate prevention/early diagnosis practices in members of families with breast/ovarian familial cancer syndrome.

Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a comparison of affected and unaffected women.

The objective of this study is to evaluate women's awareness and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk, to identify socio-demographic factors, to analyse the reasons for wanting or not wanting to be tested and finally to determine whether breast cancer patients and healthy women have different attitudes towards genetic testing. Consecutive series of 879 women without and with breast cancer participated in a 20-item self-completing questionnaire. Among breast cancer patients, 57% answered that they would definitely or probably accept being tested, compared with 84% of women without breast cancer. At the multiple logistic regression analysis only to have a diagnosis of breast cancer conditioned significantly the interest to have genetic testing. Surprisingly, a family history of breast cancer was found to have no significant impact. The most frequently cited reason for being interested in genetic testing was 'to learn about your children's risk'. Although women's awareness about breast cancer genes is inadequate, the interest in genetic testing is substantial and higher both in healthy women and in women with breast cancer. These results provide important indications for the development of educational strategies.

BRCA1 mutations and polymorphisms in a hospital-based consecutive series of breast cancer patients from Apulia, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary breast cancer has been partly attributed to germline mutations in the BRCA1 gene that are deleterious for BRCA1 protein activity. This paper analyzes the incidence and characteristics of detectable BRCA1 mutations and polymorphisms in a hospital-based consecutive series of breast cancer patients from southern Italy to investigate the incidence and the association of these molecular alterations with breast cancer biology and family history. METHODS: One hundred cases with familial characteristics were selected from a consecutive series of 511 patients with a first diagnosis of breast cancer. DNA from peripheral blood was screened for whole BRCA1 gene mutations utilizing dHPLC as a pre-screening analysis and automatic DNA sequencing for the identification of specific alterations. RESULTS: In the overall series of 511 patients, 100 had a family history of breast cancer and were investigated for BRCA1 mutations. Two types of BRCA1 mutations were identified, 5382insC in six cases and 4566delA in one case. The 5382insC mutation was present in two out of six cases with ovarian cancer while 4566delA in one case of male cancer. The most frequent missense polymorphisms were E1038G, P871L, K1183R in exon 11, S1613G, M1652I in exon 16 and D1778G in exon 22. Confirming what found in previous studies, patients in whom pathological BRCA1 mutations were detected had early-onset breast cancer (p=0.05), positive nodal status (p=0.05), lower ER (p=0.02) and PgR (p=0.01) content. Interestingly, the K1183R polymorphism and, less strongly, S1613G polymorphism were associated to mutational risk (K1183R: OR 0.1 p=0.03; S1613G: OR 2.7 p=0.08). CONCLUSION: Mutations in the BRCA1 gene are frequent also in our consecutive series of patients from southern Italy. An association between two detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and BRCA1 mutational risk was ascertained. Finally, we confirm the fact that peculiar clinical-pathological features seem to characterize patients with a family history of breast cancer and BRCA1 alterations.

Temperature-dependence of the age-related difference in the inotropic effect of norepinephrine in the rat myocardium.

The influence of temperature on the myocardial inotropic response to norepinephrine was studied in rats of different ages. Right papillary muscles isolated from 3-, 12-, and 24-month-old rats were superfused at two temperatures (29 degrees C and 37 degrees C) with progressively larger doses of norepinephrine. At 29 degrees C, the contraction duration was longer and the inotropic effect of norepinephrine was significantly smaller in 24-month muscles than in 3- and 12-month preparations. In muscles superfused at 37 degrees C, these age-related differences in the contraction duration and in the response to norepinephrine disappeared. Analysis of variance and covariance showed that temperature, but not age, is responsible for the differences in the inotropic response to norepinephrine observed. These results show that experimental conditions, among which temperature may play a major role, deeply affect the responsiveness of cardiac preparations to beta-adrenergic agonists.

[Pneumoconiosis in bauxite miners]. / Pneumoconiosi in minatori di bauxite.

The authors examined a group of 40 miners who were being working at an Apulian bauxite mine, presently inactive. Radiographic findings of pulmonary micronodulation without significant reduction of lung functions were showed in 15 miners. Mineralogical analysis of mine dust samples excluded any presence of more than 1% free silica. As a result of this study hypotheses have been formulated about pathogenesis of this moderated and non-invasive pneumoconiosis, showed in long exposed subjects to low silica content dusts.