Alabama Community Pharmacists' Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding Fentanyl Test Strips: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are used to detect the presence of fentanyl in other substances, but Alabama pharmacists' opinions regarding FTS provision are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perceptions of Alabama pharmacists regarding FTS and factors influencing pharmacists' FTS provision intentions across community pharmacy locations and types. METHODS: An anonymous cross-sectional survey was distributed via email to Alabama pharmacists employed in community (retail) pharmacies. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions and 5-point Likert-type scales (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree) informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Primary outcome measures included: knowledge; general attitudes; perceived benefits; perceived barriers; self-efficacy; subjective norms; perceived behavioral control (PBC); and intention regarding FTS provision. Outcomes were characterized using descriptive statistics and differences in scales scores across pharmacy locations (rural versus urban) and types (corporately- versus independently-owned) were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Predictors of FTS provision intentions were evaluated using multiple linear regression (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Respondents (N=131; 3.82% response rate) were mostly female (64%) and Caucasian (92%). No respondents stocked FTS at their pharmacy and knowledge about FTS was low (mean[SD] knowledge score: 58.7%[15.1]). Despite the existence of perceived barriers (mean[SD] scale score: 3.2[0.6]), pharmacists' general attitudes (3.4[0.5]), perceived benefits (3.7[0.6]), self-efficacy (3.1[0.8]), and intentions (3.2[0.7]) were positive. While subjective norms were positive (3.5[0.6]), PBC over FTS decision-making was negative (2.7[0.8]). Subjective norms were higher (p=0.040) and PBC was lower (p<0.001) amongst corporately- versus independently-owned pharmacies, but no differences existed between rural and urban locations for any measures. Additionally, perceived benefits (ß=0.342, p=0.002), PBC (ß=0.133, p=0.045), and self-efficacy (ß=0.142, p=0.034) were positive predictors and perceived barriers (ß=-0.211, p=0.029) was a negative predictor of intention. CONCLUSION: Alabama community pharmacists have positive attitudes regarding FTS, but future research should focus on strategies to increase PBC and overcome perceived barriers.

Evaluation of a poverty-focused educational program and simulation for pharmacists.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited literature explores the impact that poverty-focused educational simulations can have on practicing clinicians. This study used a poverty simulation, specifically created to resemble the lives of Medicare patients, to sensitize practicing pharmacists to the situations faced by people living in poverty. The study evaluated how a poverty-focused educational program impacted practicing pharmacists' actual knowledge gain, intention to assist patients with limited income, and satisfaction with the educational program. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A quasi-experimental one-group pre-/posttest design of practicing pharmacists was utilized. The intervention was a live continuing educational (CE) program at a pharmacy alumni event and a pharmacy convention. The CE program was delivered in person and included a Medicare poverty simulation and a 75-min didactic lecture. Pre- and posttests were used to assess outcomes. The primary outcome was change in knowledge as measured by test scores. Secondary outcomes included intention to assist future low-income patients and participant satisfaction with the educational program. FINDINGS: Eighty-nine pharmacists participated in the educational program. Participants' mean knowledge increased from 2.76 (SD = 0.97) to 3.61 (SD = 1.21) (P < .001) out of 5. The majority (88.3%) agreed they were interested in assisting patients with limited income in the future. Most participants strongly agreed that the program was satisfactory and contributed to their learning. SUMMARY: This is the first identifiable study that incorporated a poverty simulation into an educational program for practicing pharmacists. The study may help inform the development of future educational programs for practicing pharmacists.

Participation in emergency preparedness and response: a national survey of pharmacists and pharmacist extenders.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the critical role of pharmacists in pandemic response. To enhance pharmacist's involvement in future emergency situations, there is a critical need to understand pharmacists' knowledge, willingness and preparedness in response to various emergency situations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe pharmacists and pharmacist extenders on their participation in emergency response activities and training, preparedness and willingness to respond in emergency situations, and knowledge of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and their pharmacy's emergency preparedness plans. METHODS: A cross-sectional design with an online survey of pharmacist, pharmacy owner, and pharmacy technician members of the National Community Pharmacists Association was employed in the United States in July - August 2020. Descriptive statistics summarized participants' level of actual participation and their willingness to participate in emergency situations and training and their knowledge of MOU and their pharmacy's emergency plans. A non-response bias investigation was conducted by comparing the early and late responders. RESULTS: Of the 6,486 members, 255 completed the questionnaire (RR1 = 4.0%). With the confidence level of 95%, the margin of error was 6%. About 60% were independently owned and in urban areas. More than 80% and 64% of the participants have not volunteered in any emergency or participated in any emergency training program, respectively. Over 60% were very willing to assist with the distribution of medications and vaccine administration. Less than 10% had MOUs with health departments. More than 60% of respondents were not aware of what MOU is. CONCLUSION: Despite limited involvement in actual emergency activities and training, pharmacists and pharmacist extenders exhibited a high level of willingness to participate in emergency training and assist in case of emergencies. This study recommends the development of programs aimed at increasing pharmacists' and pharmacist extenders' participation in emergency training and in future public health emergencies.

Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Because Medicare plan coverage and costs change annually and older adults, the major beneficiaries of Medicare, are faced with multiple health conditions and changing medical needs, Medicare beneficiaries should evaluate their options during open enrollment every year. However, because of the complexity of plan selection, it may be challenging for Medicare beneficiaries to make an appropriate decision from among competing options. OBJECTIVES: To (a) identify factors that beneficiaries consider having influenced their plan selection decision and (b) describe the decision-making process according to the consumer decision-making model (CDM). The 2 research questions guiding this study included (a) factors Medicare beneficiaries considered having influenced their Medicare plan selection decision and (b) characteristics of decision-making processes employed by Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: This is a phenomenological qualitative study. Semistructured in-person or telephone interviews with Alabama residents who have Medicare as the sole insurance provider were conducted between June and August 2019. Participant recruitment continued until reaching the saturation point. Each interview session consisted of structured questions identifying characteristics of participants and open-ended questions used to elicit participant Medicare plan decisionmaking process and factors affecting their decision. Data were analyzed using content analysis with a process of qualitative inductive coding. RESULTS: Twenty participants were interviewed. Twenty codes were identified and categorized into 5 themes regarding the factors influencing plan selection decisions by beneficiaries. When making a plan selection, participants were influenced by plan attributes (including cost, coverage, access to doctors, region, quality rating, and transportation); information resources and personal assistance; knowledge about Medicare; status and changes in personal situation; and experience with Medicare. Additionally, we identified 7 codes relating to beneficiary characteristics during decision-making processes, including being proactive, setting priorities, limiting choices, evaluating plans against personal needs, acquiescing to recommendations, sticking to the status quo, and weighing trade-offs. We consulted the CDM and created a conceptual model demonstrating a 5-step Medicare plan selection decision-making process and the factors influencing that process. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Auburn University Undergraduate Research Program. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. CONCLUSIONS: This study created a step-by-step decision flowchart of Medicare plan selection to illustrate the complexity of the plan selection that Medicare beneficiaries must use. We uncovered the plan selection decision-making process among Medicare beneficiaries and factors affecting that process. Drawing from the CDM and the study findings, we developed a conceptual model. Findings will help researchers and community agencies target Medicare beneficiaries with different needs for assistance and design decision-making interventions/tools to help beneficiaries make rational decisions when selecting Medicare plans. These findings suggest that health care professionals should be involved in assistance programs to maximize efficiency of Medicare plan selection and to improve monitoring and consulting mechanisms to ensure the reliability of assistance information and services.

Recommendations to protect patients and health care practices from Medicare and Medicaid fraud.

Fraud is defined as knowingly submitting, or causing to be submitted, false claims or making misrepresentations of a fact to obtain a federal health care payment for which no entitlement would otherwise exist. In today's health care environment, Medicare and Medicaid fraud is not uncommon. The negative impact of fraud is vast because it diverts resources meant to care for patients in need to the benefit of fraudsters. Fraud increases the overall costs for vital health care services and can potentially be harmful to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. The objectives of this commentary are to describe the types and trends of Medicare and Medicaid fraud that are committed, and provide recommendations to protect patients and health care practices. Specifically, this article identifies types of Medicare and Medicaid fraud at beneficiary (patient) and provider level, and it can be intentional or unintentional. This article also describes the 3 primary laws that prohibit fraud and gives fraud case examples relevant to each law, including the False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback Statute, and the Stark Law. We also discuss currently trending and emerging areas, including opioid and pharmacogenetic testing; both have experienced heavier and higher-profile instances of fraud in today's health care landscape. Last, the article summarizes detection methods and recommendations for health care providers and patients to protect themselves against fraud. Recommended strategies to combat fraud are discussed at policy, practice, and grassroots levels. Health care practitioners, including pharmacists, can use these strategies to protect themselves and their patients from becoming victims of fraud or unknowingly committing fraud.