Transvenous extraction of cardiac rhythm device leads: a report of the experience from a single referral centre in Greece.

INTRODUCTION: As rates of implanted cardiac electronic devices continue to rise, lead extraction procedures are crucial for the management of complications. The optimal method for such procedures has been constantly debated. We sought to review our experience of lead extraction using a conventional technique. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of lead extraction procedures in a major referral centre in Greece. Leads were extracted in a series of 66 consecutive patients (69% men, age range 53-90 years) who visited our centre between August 2008 and June 2012. The extraction procedure was performed in the catheterization lab with a widely used system composed of a locking stylet and sheath. RESULTS: A total of 120 leads were extracted (51 atrial, 69 ventricular) including 19 defibrillator leads and 9 coronary sinus leads. The most frequent indication for lead extraction was infective endocarditis (28 patients, 42%), followed by generator pocket infection (22 patients, 33%), and lead malfunction (16 patients, 24%). Extraction was achieved through the venous entry-site approach in all procedures. The leads were completely extracted in 65 patients (98.5%). Only one complication was recorded: perforation of the right atrium in one patient (1.5%), who eventually underwent emergency cardiac surgery with a good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that a conventional mechanical technique is highly effective for successful extraction of all types of implanted cardiac electronic device leads and is associated with very limited complications.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy activation for high risk patients with relatively well preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Does it really work?

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death have used a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% as a critical point to justify implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in post myocardial infarction patients and in those with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We compared mortality and ICD activation rates among different ICD group recipients using a cut-off value for LVEF ≤ 35%. METHODS: We followed up for a mean period of 41.1 months 495 ICD recipients (442 males, 65.6 years old, 68.9% post myocardial infarction patients, 422 with LVEF ≤ 35%). Prevention was considered primary in patients who fulfilled guidelines criteria or had inducible ventricular arrhythmia during programmed ventricular stimulation for patients with LVEF >35%. RESULTS: Over the course of the trial, 84 of 495 patients died; 69 experienced cardiac death (6 sudden) and 15 non cardiac death. ICD recipients with LVEF ≤ 35% compared to those with preserved LVEF (mean LVEF=43%) had a greater incidence of total mortality (18% vs. 11%, log rank p=0.028) and cardiac death (15.4% vs. 5.5%, log rank p=0.005). There was no difference in the incidence for appropriate device therapy between patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and those with LVEF >35% (56.9% vs. 65.8%, log rank p=0.93). In the multivariate analysis the presence of advanced New York Heart Association stage predicted both total mortality (HR=2.69, 95% CI 1.771-4.086) and cardiac death (HR=3.437, 95% CI 2.163-5.463). CONCLUSIONS: ICD therapy may protect heart failure patients at early stages from arrhythmic morbidity and mortality, based on an electrophysiology-guided risk stratification approach.

ST-Segment Depression in Hyperventilation Indicates a False Positive Exercise Test in Patients with Mitral Valve Prolapse.

Objectives. Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a known cause for false positive exercise test (ET). The purpose of this study was to establish additional electrocardiographic criteria to distinguish the false positive exercise results in patients with MVP. Methods. We studied 218 consecutive patients (53 ± 6 years, 103 males) with MVP (according to echocardiographic study), and positive treadmill ET was performed due to multiple cardiovascular risk factors or angina-like symptoms. A coronary angiography was performed to detect coronary artery disease (CAD). Results. From 218 patients, 90 (group A) presented with normal coronary arteries according to the angiography (false positive ET) while the rest 128 (group B) presented with CAD. ST-segment depression in hyperventilation phase was present in 54 patients of group A (60%) while only in 14 patients of group B (11%), P < .05. Conclusions. Presence of ST-segment depression in hyperventilation phase favors a false positive ET in patients with MVP.