Association of Racial and Economic Privilege on Postoperative Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

INTRODUCTION: Social determinants of health can play an important role in patient health. Privilege is a right, benefit, advantage, or opportunity that can positively affect all social determinants of health. We sought to assess variations in the prevalence of privilege among patient populations and define the association of privilege on postoperative surgical outcomes. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, colectomy, and lung resection were identified. The Index of Concentration of Extremes (ICE), a validated metric of both social spatial polarization and privilege was calculated and merged with county-level data obtained from the American Community Survey. Textbook outcome (TO) was defined as absence of postoperative complications, extended length of stay, 90-day mortality, and 90-day readmission. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between ICE and TO. RESULTS: Among 1,885,889 Medicare beneficiaries who met inclusion criteria, 655,980 (34.8%) individuals resided in areas with the highest privilege (i.e., White, high-income homogeneity), whereas 221,314 (11.7%) individuals resided in areas of the lowest privilege (i.e., Black, low-income homogeneity). The overall incidence of TO was 66.2% (n = 1,247,558). On multivariable regression, residence in the most advantaged neighbourhoods was associated with a lower chance of surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.91), a prolonged length of stay (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.79-82), 90-day readmission (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95), and 90-day mortality (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.68-0.74) (all P < 0.001). Residence in the most privileged areas was associated with 19% increased odds of achieving TO (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.18-1.21), as well as a 6% reduction in Medicare expenditures versus individuals in the least privileged counties (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.94-0.94) (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Privilege, based on the ICE joint measure of racial/ethnic and economic spatial concentration, was strongly associated with the likelihood to achieve an "optimal" TO following surgery. As healthcare is a basic human right, privilege should not be associated with disparities in surgical care.

Association of surgeon-patient sex concordance with postoperative outcomes following complex cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sex concordance may impact the therapeutic relationship and provider-patient interactions. We sought to define the association of surgeon-patient sex concordance on postoperative patient outcomes following complex cancer surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for lung, breast, hepato-pancreato-biliary, or colorectal cancer between 2014 and 2020 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. The impact of surgeon-patient sex concordance or discordance on achieving an optimal postoperative textbook outcome (TO) was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 495 628 patients, 241 938 (48.8%) patients were sex concordant with their surgeon while 253 690 (51.2%) patients were sex discordant. Sex discordance between surgeon and patient was associated with a decreased likelihood to achieve a postoperative TO (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; p < 0.001). Sex discordance was associated with a higher risk of complications (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07; p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09; p = 0.011). Of note, male patients treated by female surgeons (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.017) had a similar lower likelihood to achieve a TO as female patients treated by male surgeons (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sex discordance was associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving an "optimal" postoperative course following complex cancer surgery.

Association of County-Level Food Deserts and Food Swamps with Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition has been linked to the development of hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancer. We sought to examine the association between food swamps and food deserts on surgical outcomes of patients with HPB cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for HPB cancer between 2014 and 2020 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. Patient-level data were linked to the United States Department of Agriculture data on food swamps and deserts. Multivariable regression was performed to examine the association between the food environment and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 53,426 patients, patients from the worse food environment were more likely to be Black, have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and reside in areas with high social vulnerability. Following surgery, the overall incidence of textbook outcome (TO) was 41.6% (n = 22,220). Patients residing in the worse food environments less often achieved a TO versus individuals residing in the healthiest food environments (food swamp: 39.4% vs. 43.9%; food desert: 38.5% vs 42.2%; p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, individuals residing in the poorest food environments were associated with lower odds of achieving TO compared with individuals living in healthiest food environments (food swamp: OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.75-0.92, food desert: OR 0.86, 95%CI 0.76-0.97; both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The surrounding food environment of patients may serve as a modifiable socio-demographic risk factor that contributes to disparities in surgical outcomes of HPB cancer.

Cohort contributions to trends in the incidence and mortality of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are increasing worldwide. We used age-period-cohort (APC) modeling to evaluate the contribution of cohort effects to trends in ICC incidence and mortality in the US. METHODS: Incidence data were acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER) program. Mortality data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER Database. APC models using restricted cubic splines were fitted to estimate change in incidence and mortality risk over age, and modification of incidence and mortality risks according to birth cohort and period of diagnosis or death. Likelihood ratio tests were used to summarize improvement in model fit with APC modeling. RESULTS: There were 4,053 cases of ICC at SEER registry sites between 1973-2012. ICC incidence increased with older age and across all birth cohorts examined. Inclusion of cohort effects tended to improve model fit relative to an age-period model (likelihood ratio test P=0.082). The national crude ICC-related mortality rate increased from 2.9 to 5.0 per 100,000 among males and 2.7 to 4.6 per 100,000 among females. Among males, ICC mortality risk varied across birth cohorts, and inclusion of cohort effects in a model predicting ICC mortality risk improved model fit (likelihood ratio test P=0.001), but cohort effects did not alter model fit among females (P=0.223). CONCLUSIONS: ICC incidence and mortality have increased over time in the United States. Birth cohort effects influenced increased ICC incidence and ICC mortality among males, but were not evident in the trend of ICC mortality among females.

Evaluation of the 8th edition American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) using a cancer registry. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry was queried to identify 1008 patients who underwent surgical resection of ICC during 1998-2013. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze long-term survival. The relative discriminative abilities were assessed using the Harrell's concordance index. RESULTS: Median patient age was 62 years and 47.6% of the patients were male. Most tumors were T1 or T2 (n = 413, 41.0% and n = 329, 32.6%, respectively) and 22.1% of patients had lymph node (LN) metastasis. Median tumor size was 5.5 cm. With a median follow-up of 18 months, median survival was 27 months and 5-year OS was 30.6%. The OS c-index for the AJCC 8th staging system was 0.669, which was comparable with the c-index for the 7th edition AJCC staging system (c-index: 0.667); the AJCC 8th-edition did provide more discrete stratification of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The new AJCC 8th-edition staging system for ICC was largely comparable to the 7th-edition version and did not provide a marked improvement in overall prognostic discrimination.