Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 16 Suppl 2: S34-8, 1999 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10613553

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: New less invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of coronary artery single-vessel disease have been developed by either avoiding median sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass or both, however, until now no prospective randomized trial has been carried out to compare these techniques to the conventional approach with special respect to the psychosomatical effects. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial four different surgical techniques were compared. Group 1: conventional technique (median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass) in ten patients (eight male, two female, age 59.6 +/- 11.0 years); Group 2: off-pump coronary artery bypass with median sternotomy in nine patients (six male, three female, age 65.7 +/- 11.1 years); Group 3: lateral minithoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass in eight patients (five male, three female, age 62.3 +/- 9.9 years). Group 4: off-pump procedure and lateral minithoracotomy in nine patients (eight male, one female, age 63.8 +/- 11.3 years). All patients due to coronary artery single-vessel disease. The tests used for psychosomatic situation were post-traumatic stress disorders scale, pain behavior rating scale, pain visual analog scale, and 6' walking-distance. For detection of false results due to surgical technical failures 3-month follow-up was undertaken including echocardiography and coronary angiogram. RESULTS: There were no deaths or major complications. Operative time was longer in lateral minithoracotomy procedures, but intensive care unit stay and hospitalization were equal in all groups. Pain visual analog scale and pain behavior rating scale showed a peak on post-operative day 4 in median sternotomy procedures. Post-traumatic stress disorder scale revealed higher values on post-operative day 4 and equalizing with lateral minithoracotomy procedures 1 month post-operatively. Six-minutes walking distance on post-operative day 4 was longer in the group with lateral minithoracotomy. Three-month follow-up revealed patency of all grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Even if surgery is successful in all procedures, operative time is longer in lateral minithoracotomy procedures without compromising intensive care unit stay and hospital stay. More pain with multiple post-traumatic stress disorders is related to median sternotomy, and post-operative convalescence is superior for lateral minithoracotomy procedures.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/etiologia , Esterno/cirurgia , Toracotomia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Angiografia Coronária , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Testes Psicológicos , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 16 Suppl 2: S48-52, 1999 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10613556

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In order to evaluate the benefit provided through less invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease, a prospective clinical trial was started. METHODS: Group 1 included 53 patients (38 males, 15 females, age 51-79 years, mean 62.8 +/- 6.1 years) receiving conventional bypass surgery, group 2 included 69 patients (59 male, 10 female, age 43-82 years, mean 61.9 +/- 8.6 years) receiving less invasive surgical procedure including minithoracotomy in combination with cardiopulmonary bypass. RESULTS: No perioperative death occurred in the whole series of patients. Time of operation was 267 +/- 61 min in group 2 and 162.9 +/- 53.6 min in group 1. Intensive Care Unit stay was 1 day for both groups and Hospitalization 6.9 +/- 6.0 for group 1 and 7.5 +/- 2.6 days for group 2. Perioperative bleeding was less in group 2 (P > 0.01). Back and chest pain assessment on postoperative day 3 showed less pain in group 2 (P < 0.05). Three-month follow-up revealed ischemia in stress electrocardiogram in two patients (3.8%) in group 1 and in 2 patients (2.9%) in group 2. Coronary angiograms confirmed the stress ECG findings. There was one (1.4%) redo operation in group 2 and two (3.8%) in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques are equal efficient. Even though time of operation is longer in patients receiving less invasive procedure, intensive care unit stay and hospitalization is exactly as long. Patients receiving minimally invasive surgery bleed less and have less pain early postoperatively.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Esterno/cirurgia , Toracotomia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografia , Eletrocardiografia , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...