Deaf perceptions about treatment for alcohol use and mental health.

INTRODUCTION: Recent research suggests that alcohol use disorder may be more prevalent in the Deaf community, a diverse sociolinguistic minority group. However, rates of treatment-seeking among Deaf individuals are even lower than in the general society. This study used the Theory of Planned Behavior to identify Deaf adults' beliefs about treatment that may prevent their treatment-seeking behaviors. METHODS: This study conducted elicitation interviews with 16 Deaf adults. The study team recruited participants from across the U.S. and conducted interviews on Zoom. Participant ages ranged from 27 to 67 years (M = 40, SD =10.8). Seventy-five percent of the sample was male, 75 % were White, and 12.5 % were Hispanic/Latine. The study conducted interviews in American Sign Language, subsequently interpreted into English by a nationally certified interpreter, and transcribed for data analyses. The study analyzed transcripts using the Framework Method. The study team coded the interviews in groups and assessed for saturation (≤ 5 % new themes) of themes throughout the analysis. This study reached saturation in the third group (six total groups). RESULTS: Identified themes followed the Theory of Planned Behavior constructs. The study identified nine Behavioral Beliefs with four advantages and five disadvantages of seeking treatment, four Normative Beliefs with one support and three oppositions to seeking treatment, and thirteen Control Beliefs with five facilitators and eight barriers to seeking treatment. Overall, the Deaf participants reported several unique beliefs based on their cultural and linguistic perspectives, including a concern about unqualified providers, experiencing stress in treatment with hearing providers, stigma within the Deaf community, less access to cultural information about alcohol and mental health, less encouragement of traditional treatment in marginalized communities, and additional barriers (e.g., communication, limited Deaf treatment options, discrimination, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: A thorough understanding of individual beliefs about treatment is necessary to develop interventions that may increase treatment-seeking behaviors. Previous research has demonstrated that individual beliefs may be modified using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy techniques to increase treatment-seeking behaviors among hearing individuals. Similar interventions may be useful with Deaf individuals; however, they must consider the unique cultural and linguistic perspectives of the community.

Use of Routine Emergency Department Care Practices with Deaf American Sign Language Users.

BACKGROUND: Deaf individuals who communicate using American Sign Language (ASL) seem to experience a range of disparities in health care, but there are few empirical data. OBJECTIVE: To examine the provision of common care practices in the emergency department (ED) to this population. METHODS: ED visits in 2018 at a U.S. academic medical center were assessed retrospectively in Deaf adults who primarily use ASL (n = 257) and hearing individuals who primarily use English, selected at random (n = 429). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for confounders compared the groups on the provision or nonprovision of four routine ED care practices (i.e., laboratories ordered, medications ordered, images ordered, placement of peripheral intravenous line [PIV]) and on ED disposition (admitted to hospital or not admitted). RESULTS: The ED encounters with Deaf ASL users were less likely to include laboratory tests being ordered: adjusted odds ratio 0.68 and 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.97. ED encounters with Deaf individuals were also less likely to include PIV placement, less likely to result in images being ordered in the ED care of ASL users of high acuity compared with English users of high acuity (but not low acuity), and less likely to result in hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Results suggest disparate provision of several types of routine ED care for adult Deaf ASL users. Limitations include the observational study design at a single site and reliance on the medical record, underscoring the need for further research and potential reasons for disparate ED care with Deaf individuals.