Mind the Gap: A Questionnaire on the Distance between Diagnostic Advances and Clinical Practice in Skin Cancer Treatment.

Background and Objectives: Significant progress has been made in skin cancer diagnosis, with a surge in available technologies in recent years. Despite this, the practical application and integration of these technologies in dermatology and plastic surgery remain uneven. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive 20-question survey was designed and distributed using online survey administration software (Google Forms, 2018, Google, Mountain View, CA, USA) from June 2023 to September 2023. The survey aimed to assess the knowledge and utilization of dermatologic diagnostic advancements among plastic surgeons in various European countries. Results: Data were obtained from 29 plastic surgeons across nine European countries, revealing a notable gap between diagnostic technologies and their routine use in surgical practice. The gap for some technologies was both cognitive and applicative; for electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and multispectral imaging, only 6.9% of the sample knew of the technologies and no surgeons in the sample used them. In the case of other technologies, such as high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), 72.4% of the sample knew about them but only 34.5% used them, highlighting a more significant application problem. Conclusions: Spotlighting this discrepancy provides a valuable foundation for initiating collaborative efforts between units and facilitating knowledge exchange among diverse specialists. This, in turn, contributes to advancing clinical practice by integrating the innovative opportunities presented by ongoing research.

Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders in Aesthetic Surgery.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to characterize and objectify the prevalence of psychiatric disorders and the use of psychotropic drugs in patients interested in undergoing aesthetic surgery. The psychiatric profile of this population is particularly interesting and is related to self-perception and the general concept of beauty. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, and bicenter study of 2092 patients seen in plastic surgery departments. Data on general characteristics, pathology, psychiatric history (PH), use of psychotropic drugs, addictions, surgical requests, and surgical complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Based on our inclusion criteria, we selected 524 patients. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was 32.25%. The prevalence of depressive disorders (19.27%), anxiety disorders (8.21%), and sleep-wake cycle disorders (7.06%) should be noted. Comparing the population with psychiatric history (PH+) and without psychiatric history (PH-), significant differences were found in patient ethnicity, addictions (tobacco, 37.50% vs 15.00%; drugs, 3.26% vs 0.59%), and comorbidities. In the 66.86% (n = 113) of PH+ patients, the plastic surgeon did not record the presence of psychiatric disorders in the medical record. DISCUSSION: This study offers a broad view of the prevalence and characteristics of psychiatric disorders and the use of psychotropic drugs among patients who want to undergo aesthetic surgery. The prevalence of psychiatric problems in the study population is higher than in the general population (32.25% vs 15.02%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that plastic surgeons should be properly trained to manage these patients. A multidisciplinary approach involving plastic surgeons, psychiatrists, and psychologists is advocated.

Demographic Study and Description of the Surgical Demand in Aesthetic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The demand for aesthetic surgery presents a continuously growing trend over the years. The population wishing to undergo this type of surgery presents unique characteristics that are profoundly different in motivational, demographic, and clinical features from patients in other specialties. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our multicenter study is to objectively define the surgical demand and the demographic characteristics of our patients comparing them with general population. We try to better define who are our patients. METHODS: We conducted an observational, multicenter, retrospective study analyzing 3329 consultations involving a total of 2092 patients between January 2019 and June 2019. Based on the inclusion criteria, we selected 524 patients whose demographic characteristics, body mass index, addictions, comorbidities, and aesthetic surgery demand were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of our population is 38.58 years (female-to-male ratio, 9:1). The mean body mass index is 27.50 (5.23). A total of 22.90% of the sample have smoking habits, 3.63% have alcohol addiction, 1.53% have drugs addiction, and 53.63% of the population have relevant comorbidities.The 56.68% of the patients have already undergone surgery. The conversion rate of our first consultations to surgery is 49.05%. The most requested operation is abdominoplasty (36.45%), followed by liposuction (22.90%), breast reduction (17.56%), mastopexy (14.79%), and rhinoplasty (7.63%). CONCLUSIONS: This topic is downplayed and seldom studied in the literature; our effort is to make patient profiling crucial and evidence-based in aesthetic surgery.

Fat graft for reducing pain in chronic wounds.

BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds are one of the most important challenge for regenerative surgery. Plastic surgeon can use fat graft to increase wound healing because its growth factors can enhance tissue regeneration. In a recent study, the authors evaluated a reduction of pain in a cohort of patients submitted to breast reconstruction with breast implant and lipofilling, putting into evidence that growth factors in fat graft can reduce post-surgical pain. The aim of this work is to evaluate ultra-filtered fat graft potential in reducing pain in chronic wounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty new patients with chronic wounds of different etiology were recruited for this study and divided into two groups: A, treatment and B, control. Twenty-five patients per group. Negative pressure therapy dressing was applied after surgical debridement. Three days later patients in group A received ultrafiltered fat graft. Pain was evaluated with preoperative Visual Analogic Scale, repeated twice a day for 14 days and finally 21 days from procedures. RESULTS: In group A (treated patients), pain was lower. These data were confirmed even after 7 days. The overall statistical analysis of the average of all values (SD 1.72) confirmed that the differences were significant at the 95% with the Chi-square test and analysis of variance (P value < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The ultra-filtered fat graft placed on the wound bed and edges was effective in reducing pain in chronic wounds. The reduction of pain was statistically significant.