Efficacy and safety of long-term indwelling plastic stents after resolution of pancreatic fluid collections with endoscopic transmural drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) may recur after resolution with endoscopic transmural drainage (ETD) and standard stent removal (SSR). Herein, we compared the efficacy and safety of leaving long-term indwelling plastic stents (LTIS) vs. standard stent removal after PFC resolution with ETD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to September 2022. Full-text articles comparing long-term (> 6 months) outcomes of LTIS and SSR were eligible, as well as single-arm studies with ≥ 10 patients with LTIS. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Measured outcomes included the following: (A) PFC recurrence; (B) interventions for PFC recurrence; (C) technical success; and (D) adverse events (AEs). Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models. RESULTS: We included 16 studies, encompassing 1285 patients. Compared to SSR after PFC resolution with ETD, LTIS was associated with significantly lower risk of PFC recurrence (3% vs. 23%; OR 0.22 [95%CI 0.09-0.52]; I2 = 45%) and need for interventions (2% vs. 14%; OR 0.35 [95%CI 0.16-0.78]; I2 = 0%). The superiority of LTIS on reducing PFC recurrence was found with walled-off necrosis, with or without disconnected pancreatic duct, and with placement of ≥ 2 LTIS. When using LTIS, the pooled proportion of AEs was 8% (95%CI 4-11%) and technical success was 93% (95%CI 86-99%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that LTIS after PFC resolution with ETD is feasible, safe, and superior to SSR in reducing the risk of PFC recurrence and need for interventions.

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Is Common in Chronic Pancreatitis and Associates With Diabetes, Chronic Pancreatitis Severity, Low Zinc Levels, and Opiate Use.

OBJECTIVES: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is often present in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) with persistent steatorrhea, despite pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. Overall prevalence of SIBO, diagnosed by glucose breath test (GBT), varies between 0% and 40% but 0%-21% in those without upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. We investigated the prevalence and nonsurgical independent predictors of SIBO in CP without upper GI surgery. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-three patients ≥18 years old had a presumptive diagnosis of CP and a GBT between 1989 and 2017. We defined CP by Mayo score (0-16) ≥4 and a positive GBT for SIBO by Rome consensus criteria and retrospectively collected data for 5 a priori variables (age, opiates, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus (DM), gastroparesis) and 41 investigational variables (demographics, GI symptoms, comorbidities, CP etiologies and cofactors, CP symptom duration, Mayo score and nondiabetes components, and biochemical variables). RESULTS: Ninety-eight of 273 patients had definite CP and 40.8% had SIBO. Five of 46 variables predicted SIBO: opiates, P = 0.005; DM, P = 0.04; total Mayo score, P < 0.05; zinc, P = 0.005; and albumin, P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis of 3 noncorrelated variables identified zinc level (odds ratio = 0.0001; P = 0.03) as the sole independent predictor of SIBO (model C-statistic = 0.89; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: SIBO, diagnosed by GBT, occurs in 40.8% of patients with CP without upper GI surgery. In patients with CP, markers of more severe CP (low zinc level, DM and increased Mayo score) and opiate use should raise clinical suspicion for SIBO, particularly in patients with persistent steatorrhea or weight loss despite pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.

Recent advances in understanding and managing acute pancreatitis.

This review highlights advances made in recent years in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis (AP). We focus on epidemiological, clinical, and management aspects of AP. Additionally, we discuss the role of using risk stratification tools to guide clinical decision making. The majority of patients suffer from mild AP, and only a subset develop moderately severe AP, defined as a pancreatic local complication, or severe AP, defined as persistent organ failure. In mild AP, management typically involves diagnostic evaluation and supportive care resulting usually in a short hospital length of stay (LOS). In severe AP, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to minimize morbidity and mortality over the course of a protracted hospital LOS. Based on evidence from guideline recommendations, we discuss five treatment interventions, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, feeding, prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis. This review also highlights the importance of preventive interventions to reduce hospital readmission or prevent pancreatitis, including alcohol and smoking cessation, same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis, and chemoprevention and fluid administration for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Our review aims to consolidate guideline recommendations and high-quality studies published in recent years to guide the management of AP and highlight areas in need of research.

The Chronic Pancreatitis International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification Code 577.1 Is Inaccurate Compared With Criterion-Standard Clinical Diagnostic Scoring Systems.

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies utilizing administrative databases use the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code (577.1) to identify patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). We hypothesized that coding of CP in these databases is inaccurate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1343 consecutive patients having an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 577.1 between October 1, 2005, and November 1, 2008. We labeled patients as definite CP or non-CP, defined as fulfilling any of the 3 diagnostic criteria for definite CP: Mayo, Ammann's, and the Japanese Pancreas Society criteria. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-eight subjects (49%) had definite CP. Definite CP among Mayo, Ammann's, and Japanese Pancreas Society criteria was similar (49.0, 42.1, and 43.8, respectively); 84.3% of the definite CP fulfilled all 3 criteria, 6.7% fulfilled 2, and 9.0% filled 1 criterion. Etiologies of definite CP were definite/suspected nonalcohol (57.8%) or alcohol (33.5%) and not reported (8.7%). In non-CP (n = 685), 93.7% had available imaging (5.7% had endoscopic ultrasonography ≥5 or Cambridge II-III scores), and 63.5% had symptoms suggestive of CP but did not fulfill other features for definite CP. The CP versus non-CP groups had similar mean ages but significantly more men and patients ever smoking and ever drinking alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty-one percent of subjects coded as CP do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for definite CP. Relying solely on the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification code for CP in administrative databases may lead to erroneous epidemiological conclusions.

Chronic Pancreatitis: Landmark Papers, Management Decisions, and Future.

On May 16, 2015 at the invitation of the American Gastroenterological Association Institute Council E.P.D. presented a state-of-the-art lecture at Digestive Disease Week 2015. The aims were to discuss a selection of landmark papers in chronic pancreatitis (CP) that influence modern management and to conclude by suggesting some future directions. This is based on that presentation. We will specifically review the following: duct anatomy and pancreas divisum, description of chronic relapsing pancreatitis and its differentiation from recurrent acute pancreatitis and established CP (ECP), natural histories and gene discoveries of alcoholic, idiopathic and hereditary pancreatitis, development of pancreatic cancer in CP, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and calculation of dose and delivery of enzymes, endoscopic ultrasonography, and autoimmune pancreatitis. With some exceptions, we exclude basic science and surgery.

Clinical update on fluid therapy and nutritional support in acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this focused review is to provide a valuable and updated source of information for clinical practice on fluid therapy (FT) and nutritional support in acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: The review encompasses important new clinical information that has become available for understanding and offering these specific treatments since the 2013 publication of two guidelines, both the joint International Association of Pancreatology and American Pancreatic Association and the American College of Gastroenterology. The 2015 Revised Japanese Guideline is discussed selectively. To this end, the review is divided into 7 sections, including timing and cause of mortality; severity classification systems; predicting severity; response to treatment; nutritional support; fluid therapy and steps for further research. CONCLUSIONS: In mild AP, begin oral feeding when nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain are improving. In (predicted) severe AP, feeding decisions should commence by 72 h, offering oral feeding if GI symptoms improve or enteral feeding if patients are symptomatic and/or intolerant to orals. All patients should be offered goal-directed FT during the first 6-12 h of presentation. Cautious FT is advised in those age >55 years or with preexisting organ failure or predictors of developing fluid sequestration.

Do larger periprocedural fluid volumes reduce the severity of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis?

OBJECTIVE: Fluid therapy is a cornerstone of the early treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP), but data are conflicting on whether it affects disease severity. Administering greater fluid volumes (FVs) during induction of experimental AP preserves pancreatic perfusion and reduces severity but does not prevent onset of AP. We hypothesized that administering larger FV during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) associates with less severe post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we identified 6505 patients who underwent 8264 ERCPs between January 1997 and March 2009; 211 of these patients developed PEP (48 mild, 141 moderate, and 22 severe). Data for FVs were available for 173 patients with PEP. RESULTS: In univariable analysis, only 1 of 16 variables was significantly associated with moderate to severe PEP--larger periprocedural FV was protective (0.94 T 0.3 L vs 0.81 T 0.4 L; P = 0.0129). Similarly,multivariable analysis of moderate to severe PEP identified 1 independent predictor-- larger periprocedural FV was protective (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.83). Conversely, moderate to severe disease correlated with larger FV administered after PEP diagnosis(reflecting treatment decisions). CONCLUSIONS: This hypothesis-generating study suggests that administering larger periprocedural FVs is protective against moderate to severe PEP. Prospective studies on this topic are warranted.

A combined paging alert and web-based instrument alters clinician behavior and shortens hospital length of stay in acute pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: There are many published clinical guidelines for acute pancreatitis (AP). Implementation of these recommendations is variable. We hypothesized that a clinical decision support (CDS) tool would change clinician behavior and shorten hospital length of stay (LOS). DESIGN/SETTING: Observational study, entitled, The AP Early Response (TAPER) Project. Tertiary center emergency department (ED) and hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two consecutive samplings of patients having ICD-9 code (577.0) for AP were generated from the emergency department (ED) or hospital admissions. Diagnosis of AP was based on conventional Atlanta criteria. The Pre-TAPER-CDS-Tool group (5/30/06-6/22/07) had 110 patients presenting to the ED with AP per 976 ICD-9 (577.0) codes and the Post-TAPER-CDS-Tool group (5/30/06-6/22/07) had 113 per 907 ICD-9 codes (7/14/10-5/5/11). INTERVENTION: The TAPER-CDS-Tool, developed 12/2008-7/14/2010, is a combined early, automated paging-alert system, which text pages ED clinicians about a patient with AP and an intuitive web-based point-of-care instrument, consisting of seven early management recommendations. RESULTS: The pre- vs. post-TAPER-CDS-Tool groups had similar baseline characteristics. The post-TAPER-CDS-Tool group met two management goals more frequently than the pre-TAPER-CDS-Tool group: risk stratification (P<0.0001) and intravenous fluids >6L/1st 0-24 h (P=0.0003). Mean (s.d.) hospital LOS was significantly shorter in the post-TAPER-CDS-Tool group (4.6 (3.1) vs. 6.7 (7.0) days, P=0.0126). Multivariate analysis identified four independent variables for hospital LOS: the TAPER-CDS-Tool associated with shorter LOS (P=0.0049) and three variables associated with longer LOS: Japanese severity score (P=0.0361), persistent organ failure (P=0.0088), and local pancreatic complications (<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The TAPER-CDS-Tool is associated with changed clinician behavior and shortened hospital LOS, which has significant financial implications.