A dual role for the dREAM/MMB complex in the regulation of differentiation-specific E2F/RB target genes.

E2F and RB proteins regulate the expression of genes involved in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, differentiation, and development. Recent studies indicate that they function as part of an evolutionarily conserved multiprotein complex termed dREAM/DREAM/LINC. Here we characterize the role of the Drosophila complex, dREAM, in the regulation of differentiation-specific E2F target genes in actively proliferating cells. These genes are regulated differently from cell cycle-related E2F targets, they do not depend on E2F activation, and E2F/RB repression is maintained throughout the cell cycle. In proliferating cells, their repression is dependent on dREAM. We find that dREAM plays a dual role in their regulation. First, it is required for the stability of the repressive dE2F2/RBF complexes at their promoters during S phase. Second, we find that dREAM is indispensable for both transcriptional repression mechanisms employed at these genes.

The mitotic Clb cyclins are required to alleviate HIR-mediated repression of the yeast histone genes at the G1/S transition.

The histone genes are an important group of cell cycle regulated genes whose transcription is activated during the G1/S transition and repressed in early G1, late S, and G2/M. The HIR complex, comprised of Hir1, Hir2, Hir3 and Hpc2, regulates three of the four histone gene loci. While relief of repression at the G1/S boundary involves the HIR complex, as well as other cofactors, the mechanism by which this derepression occurs remains unknown. To better understand how transcriptional repression contributes to periodic expression in the cell cycle, we sought to identify the cell cycle signals required to alleviate HIR-mediated repression of the histone genes. By measuring histone gene transcription in strains with various combinations of clb mutations, we found that the mitotic Clb1/Clb2 cyclins are required to alleviate Hir-mediated repression during the G1/S transition and that Clb2 physically interacts with the HIR complex. While the HIR complex regulates histone gene transcription in combination with two other histone H3/H4 chaperones, Asf1 and Rtt106, our data demonstrate that the mitotic Clb cyclins are necessary to specifically alleviate the repressive action of the HIR complex itself in order to allow proper expression of the histone genes in late G1/early S phase.

RB regulation of developmental transcriptional programs.

Inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) is a hallmark of human cancer. Accordingly the RB pathway has been extensively studied in mammals, flies and worms, but mostly in the context of cell cycle entry. The means by which RB proteins regulate differentiation and the transcription of genes involved in differentiation and development is less well understood. We have examined how Drosophila RB proteins regulate differentiation-specific genes in proliferating cells. We found that the mechanism of repression differs from what has been observed at cell cycle regulated genes (Figure 1). Two different chromatin modifications present at different locations contribute to the repression of such genes. We argue that this represents a novel mechanism of repression and that this type of regulation by RB proteins warrants further attention.

Drosophila RB proteins repress differentiation-specific genes via two different mechanisms.

The RB and E2F proteins play important roles in the regulation of cell division, cell death, and development by controlling the expression of genes involved in these processes. The mechanisms of repression by the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) have been extensively studied at cell cycle-regulated promoters. However, little is known about developmentally regulated E2F/RB genes. Here, we have taken advantage of the simplicity of the E2F/RB pathway in flies to inspect the regulation of differentiation-specific target genes. These genes are repressed by dE2F2/RBF and a recently identified RB-containing complex, dREAM/MMB, in a cell type- and cell cycle-independent manner. Our studies indicate that the mechanism of repression differs from that of cell cycle-regulated genes. We find that two different activities are involved in their regulation and that in proliferating cells, both are required to maintain repression. First, dE2F2/RBF and dREAM/MMB employ histone deacetylase (HDAC) activities at promoter regions. Remarkably, we have also uncovered an unconventional mechanism of repression by the Polycomb group (PcG) protein Enhancer of zeste [E(Z)], which is involved in silencing of these genes through the dimethylation of histone H3 Lys27 at nucleosomes located downstream of the transcription start sites (TSS).

The retinoblastoma protein is required for Ras-induced oncogenic transformation.

Most human cancers involve either mutational activation of the Ras oncogenic pathway and/or inactivation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) pathway. Paradoxically, tumors that harbor Ras mutations almost invariably retain expression of a wild-type pRB protein. We explain this phenomenon by demonstrating that Ras-induced oncogenic transformation surprisingly depends on functional pRB protein. Cells lacking pRB are less susceptible to the oncogenic actions of H-RasV12 than wild-type cells and activated Ras has an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of pRB-deficient human tumor cells. In addition, depletion of pRB from Ras-transformed murine cells or human tumor cells that harbor Ras pathway mutations inhibits their proliferation and anchorage-independent growth. In sharp contrast to pRB-/- 3T3 cells, fibroblasts deficient in other pRB family members (p107 and p130) are more susceptible to Ras-mediated transformation than wild-type 3T3 cells. Moreover, loss of pRB in tumor cells harboring a Ras mutation results in increased expression of p107, and overexpression of p107 but not pRB strongly inhibits proliferation of these tumor cells. Together, these findings suggest that pRB and p107 have distinct roles in Ras-mediated transformation and suggest a novel tumor-suppressive role for p107 in the context of activated Ras.

Drosophila E2F1 has context-specific pro- and antiapoptotic properties during development.

E2F transcription factors are generally believed to be positive regulators of apoptosis. In this study, we show that dE2F1 and dDP are important for the normal pattern of DNA damage-induced apoptosis in Drosophila wing discs. Unexpectedly, the role that E2F plays varies depending on the position of the cells within the disc. In irradiated wild-type discs, intervein cells show a high level of DNA damage-induced apoptosis, while cells within the D/V boundary are protected. In irradiated discs lacking E2F regulation, intervein cells are largely protected, but apoptotic cells are found at the D/V boundary. The protective effect of E2F at the D/V boundary is due to a spatially restricted role in the repression of hid. These loss-of-function experiments demonstrate that E2F cannot be classified simply as a pro- or antiapoptotic factor. Instead, the overall role of E2F in the damage response varies greatly and depends on the cellular context.

Retinoblastoma family 2 is required in vivo for the tissue-specific repression of dE2F2 target genes.

In higher eukaryotes, the Retinoblastoma and E2F families of proteins control the transcription of a large number of target genes. Here, we have mutated the second Drosophila Retinoblastoma family gene (Rbf2), and contrasted the in vivo molecular functions of RBF2 with dE2F2, the only E2F partner of RBF2. Previous studies failed to uncover a unique role for RBF2 in E2F regulation. Here we find that RBF2 functions in concert with dE2F2 in vivo to repress the expression of differentiation markers in ovaries and embryos where RBF2 is highly expressed. We have compared the profiles of transcripts that are mis-expressed in ovaries, embryos and S2 cells where RBF2 function has been ablated and find that RBF2 and dE2F2 control strikingly different transcriptional programs in each situation. In vivo promoter occupancy studies point to the redistribution of dE2F/RBF complexes to different promoters in different cell types as one mechanism governing the tissue-specific regulation of dE2F/RBF target genes. These results demonstrate that RBF2 has a unique function in repressing E2F-regulated differentiation markers and that dE2F2 and RBF2 are required to regulate different sets of target genes in different tissues.

Cell cycle-dependent and cell cycle-independent control of transcription by the Drosophila E2F/RB pathway.

To determine which E2F/RB-family members are functionally important at E2F-dependent promoters, we used RNA interference (RNAi) to selectively remove each component of the dE2F/dDP/RBF pathway, and we examined the genome-wide changes in gene expression that occur when each element is missing. The results reveal a remarkable division of labor between family members. Classic E2F targets, encoding functions needed for cell cycle progression, are expressed in cycling cells and are primarily dependent on dE2F1and RBF1 for regulation. Unexpectedly, there is a second program of dE2F/RBF-dependent transcription, in which dE2F2/RBF1or dE2F2/RBF2 complexes repress gene expression in actively proliferating cells. These new E2F target genes encode differentiation factors that are transcribed in developmentally regulated and gender-specific patterns and not in a cell cycle-regulated manner. We propose that dE2F/RBF complexes should not be viewed simply as a cell cycle regulator of transcription. Instead, dE2F/RBF-mediated repression is exerted on genes that encode an assortment of cellular functions, and these effects are reversed on sets of functionally related genes in particular developmental contexts. As a result, dE2F/RBF regulation is used to link gene expression with cell cycle progression at some targets while simultaneously providing stable repression at others.

G1 cyclin-dependent kinases are insufficient to reverse dE2F2-mediated repression.

Here we show that the cell cycle defects of dE2F1-depleted cells depend on the cooperative effects of dE2F2 and DACAPO (DAP), an inhibitor of Cyclin E/cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CycE/cdk2). The different properties of cells lacking dE2F1/dE2F2 and dE2F1/DAP lead to the surprising observation that dE2F2-mediated repression differs from retinoblastoma family protein 1 (RBF1) inhibition of dE2F1, and is resistant to both CycE/cdk2 and Cyclin D/cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CycD/cdk4). This resistance occurs even though dE2F2/RBF1 complexes are disrupted by CycE/cdk2, and may explain why dE2F2 is so potent in the absence of de2f1. The implication of these results is that cells containing dE2F2 require dE2F1 to either prevent, or reverse, dE2F-mediated repression.

Distinct mechanisms of E2F regulation by Drosophila RBF1 and RBF2.

RBF1, a Drosophila pRB family homolog, is required for cell cycle arrest and the regulation of E2F-dependent transcription. Here, we describe the properties of RBF2, a second family member. RBF2 represses E2F transcription and is present at E2F-regulated promoters. Analysis of in vivo protein complexes reveals that RBF1 and RBF2 interact with different subsets of E2F proteins. dE2F1, a potent transcriptional activator, is regulated specifically by RBF1. In contrast, RBF2 binds exclusively to dE2F2, a form of E2F that functions as a transcriptional repressor. We find that RBF2-mediated repression requires dE2F2. More over, RBF2 and dE2F2 act synergistically to antagonize dE2F1-mediated activation, and they co-operate to block S phase progression in transgenic animals. The network of interactions between RBF1 or RBF2 and dE2F1 or dE2F2 reveals how the activities of these proteins are integrated. These results suggest that there is a remarkable degree of symmetry in the arrangement of E2F and RB family members in mammalian cells and in DROSOPHILA.