Reasons Why Young Women in the United States Choose Their Contraceptive Method.

Background: Understanding reasons for birth control method choice may inform interventions that help young women choose the best method for them. The purpose of this study was to examine why young women in the general population select their method of contraception. Methods: An online survey was advertised through social media in 2017. After consenting, participants were gated through questions that ensured they were female, within the age range (16-25 years old), lived in the 50 U.S. states, and using intrauterine devices (IUDs), hormonal birth control, or barrier methods specified in the survey. Surveys with incompatible responses were excluded. Satisfaction, plans to discontinue, and primary reason for using current contraceptive method were examined and compared by contraception types using chi-square analyses. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to examine satisfaction between contraceptive methods and races/ethnicities. Results: A total of 2632 responses were included. A high frequency of women using less effective methods (48.6% of nonhormonal birth control) chose them primarily to prevent pregnancy (20.6% of Copper T IUD, 23.0% of hormonal IUD, and 30.9% of Mirena IUD users), while other more effective birth control methods were often chosen primarily for other reasons. Recommendations from family or friends (14.6%) were used by some to make their contraception decision. Black respondents were less likely and Hispanic respondents were more likely to be satisfied with their birth control compared to white women. Conclusion: Providers should consider that their young patients may want to better understand benefits and side effects of their birth control outside of pregnancy prevention. Furthermore, young women may utilize their friends and family to make their contraceptive choice, which should be taken into consideration when counseling patients.

Levonorgestrel IUD: is there a long-lasting effect on return to fertility?

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are effective and safe long-acting reversible contraceptive methods for preventing unplanned pregnancies. While extensive studies were conducted to evaluate return to fertility after removal of IUDs, majority of them were focused on multiparous women using copper IUDs. Current trends indicate increased use of levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs in nulliparous women for very long periods of time, with both nulliparity and long duration of LNG-IUD use being potentially associated with trends towards longer time to conception post removal. Understanding the effects that LNG-IUDs may have on endometrial morphology and gene expression has important implications to further understanding their mechanism of action. Studies examining endometrial gene expression show persistent changes in receptivity markers up to 1 year after removal of an inert IUD, and no similar studies have been performed after removal of LNG-IUDs. Given the current gap in the literature and trends in LNG-IUD use in nulliparous young women, studies are needed that specifically look at the interaction of nulliparity, long-term use of LNG-IUD, and return to normal fertility. Herein, we review the available literature on the mechanism of action of IUDs with a specific focus on the effect on endometrial gene expression profile changes associated with IUDs.

Achieving high HPV vaccine completion rates in a pediatric clinic population.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of an intervention utilizing patient navigators (PNs) to 1) educate families on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in a clinic setting and 2) provide personalized reminders for follow-up. Method: Families with 9-17 year-old children who had no record of completing the HPV vaccination series receiving primary or specialty care in 3 pediatric clinics were approached by PNs between February 1, 2015 and August 31, 2016. Demographic characteristics, visit type, preferred contact method, rates and correlates of completion, and appointments missed were analyzed. In addition, qualitative interviews of 21 providers and PNs assessed their perceptions of the program. Results: 1,391 adolescents were identified out of 2,162 patients approached as unvaccinated or partially vaccinated prior starters; among the unvaccinated, 930 received the 1st dose after being counseled by the PN (66.9%), either immediately or at a follow-up visit soon thereafter. This included 118 siblings of patients who did not have an appointment that day. Of initiators approached between 2/1/2015 and 8/31/2016, 93% (864/930) completed the series by 8/31/2017. No differences in series completion among initiators were observed by gender or race/ethnicity, but older patients (15-17 years old) were less likely to complete than 11-12 year olds. Of the 688 patients identified as prior starters, 85% completed the series through the program. Qualitative interviews demonstrated that providers felt the program addressed major barriers to HPV vaccination. Conclusion: Employing PNs dramatically increased HPV vaccine series completion among boys and girls with historically low HPV vaccination rates at pediatric clinics in Texas. Clinic providers felt this program addressed many barriers they observed prior to program implementation. This approach could markedly improve HPV vaccine series completion rates in the US.