Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 55(7): 1631-1639, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32237275

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the level of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered by three different CPAP delivery interfaces (RAM cannula system, Hudson prongs, and nasal mask) in preterm neonates with respiratory distress. METHODS: Preterm neonates with gestation between 28 weeks and 34 weeks and birth weight more than or equal to 1000 g and requiring nasal CPAP for respiratory distress were eligible for the study. During the study period, consecutive infants requiring CPAP were started on Hudson prongs or RAM cannula or nasal mask in that order. We measured the mean oropharyngeal pressure, which approximates the applied CPAP level. Oropharyngeal pressures in the recruited neonates were measured between 24 and 48 hours of postnatal age, when stable and in sleep or quiet awake state. Comparison of the delivered oropharyngeal pressures when on three different nasal interfaces at the same set flow rate and at set CPAP of 5 cm or 6 cm of H2 O was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Data was analyzed from 30 neonates in each group. We found that measured oropharyngeal pressures were less than set CPAP level in all three studied interfaces. Maximum drop in oropharyngeal pressure was observed with use of RAM cannula with measured oropharyngeal pressures being 1.1 and 1.2 cm H2 O less than set CPAP of 5 and 6 cm H2 O respectively. Pharyngeal pressure best correlated to set CPAP level with the use of nasal mask. CONCLUSION: None of the nasal interfaces delivered oropharyngeal pressure equivalent to the set CPAP. However, nasal mask delivered oropharyngeal pressure best matched to the set CPAP.


Assuntos
Cânula , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/instrumentação , Máscaras , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Masculino , Nariz , Orofaringe/fisiologia
2.
Sudan J Paediatr ; 19(1): 19-24, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31384084

RESUMO

The current study aims to compare the feeding outcome, morbidity and mortality in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants who received early colostrum (<12 hours of life) and those who did not. All VLBW infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were eligible for the study. Eligible infants were enrolled after obtaining written informed consent from either of the parents. Newborns who received colostrum within the first 12 hours after birth formed the study cohort and all others the control cohort. Both cohorts were followed till discharge from NICU. During the study period, 205 VLBW infants were admitted in NICU of whom 171 (83%) infants were enrolled in the study. Both study groups were comparable for mean birth weight, mean gestation and male sex. The proportion of infants with abnormal Doppler was significantly higher in the control group. All outcomes were adjusted for antenatal Doppler abnormalities. The primary outcome of time to reach full feeds in the study population was 6.90 ± 4.4 days as compared to 9.80 ± 4.86 days in the control group with a significant weighted mean difference of -2.4 (-0.8 to -3.9) days. Duration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) days and mortality were all lower in the study cohort. Risk of sepsis and necrotising enterocolitis was similar in the both groups. Enteral colostrum within first 12 hours of birth in VLBW infants reduces the time to reach full feeds, TPN days and mortality.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...