Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Educ ; 81(8): 1161-1176, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845300

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of nonmedically trained evaluators and image- and video-based tools in the assessment of surgical skills in a key orthopedic procedure. DESIGN: Orthopedic surgeons at varying skill levels were evaluated by their ability to repair a cadaveric bi-malleolar ankle fracture. Nonphysician viewers and expert orthopedic surgeons independently scored video recordings and fluoroscopy images of the procedure through Global Rating Scales (GRS) and procedure-specific checklist tools. Statistical analysis was used to determine if the evaluators and assessment tools were able to differentiate skill level. SETTING: An academic tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The surgical procedure was completed by 3 orthopedic residents, 3 orthopedic trauma fellows, and 4 orthopedic trauma attending surgeons. The procedure was independently evaluated by 2 orthopedic surgeons and 2 nonphysicians. RESULTS: Operating participants were stratified by ≤ or >10 bimalleolar ankle fracture cases performed alone (inexperienced, n = 5 vs experienced, n = 5). Expert surgeon viewers could effectively stratify skill group through the GRS for video and fluoroscopy analysis (p < 0.05), and the video procedure-specific checklist (p < 0.05), but not the fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklist. Nonphysician viewers generally recognized skill groupings, although with less separation than surgeon viewers. These evaluators performed the best when aided by video and fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklists. Meanwhile, breakdowns of each tool into critical zones for improvement and evaluator-independent metrics such as case experience, self-reported confidence, and surgical time also indicated some skill differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of using video recordings and fluoroscopic imaging based surgical skills assessment tools in orthopedic trauma was demonstrated. The tools highlighted in this study are applicable to both cadaver laboratory settings and live surgeries. The degree of training that is required by the evaluators and the utility of measuring surgical times of specific tasks should be the subject of future studies.


Assuntos
Cadáver , Competência Clínica , Estudos de Viabilidade , Gravação em Vídeo , Humanos , Fluoroscopia , Internato e Residência , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Lista de Checagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ortopedia/educação , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos
2.
J Hand Surg Am ; 48(8): 836.e1-836.e7, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36890082

RESUMO

There are very few descriptions of tendon transfers designed specifically to address the reconstruction of posterior interosseous nerve palsy (PINP). Unlike a radial nerve palsy (RNP), a patient with a PINP is able to extend their wrist but in radial deviation, because of the preserved innervation of the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL). Tendon transfers to restore finger and thumb extension in PINP have been extrapolated from tendon transfers to restore these functions in RNP, specifically using flexor carpi radialis, not flexor carpi ulnaris, so as not to further exacerbate the distinctive radial deviation deformity of the wrist. However, the standard pronator teres to extensor carpi radialis brevis transfer for a RNP fails to address or correct the radial deviation deformity in PINP. We present a simple tendon transfer specifically to address this radial deviation deformity in a PINP, by performing a side-to-side tenorrhaphy of the ECRL tendon to the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon, followed by transection of the ECRL insertion onto the base of the index finger metacarpal distal to the tenorrhaphy. This technique converts a functioning ECRL from a radially deforming force, transferring its vector of pull onto the base of the middle finger metacarpal and so producing centralization of wrist extension in axial alignment with the forearm.


Assuntos
Neuropatia Radial , Punho , Humanos , Antebraço/cirurgia , Transferência Tendinosa/métodos , Articulação do Punho/cirurgia , Articulação do Punho/fisiologia , Nervo Radial/cirurgia , Neuropatia Radial/cirurgia , Paralisia/cirurgia
3.
Injury ; 53(4): 1422-1429, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35101259

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study examined soft-tissue coverage techniques of open tibia fractures, described soft-tissue treatment patterns across income groups, and determined resource accessibility and availability in Latin America. METHODS: A 36-question survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons in Latin America through two networks: national orthopaedic societies and the Asociación de Cirujanos Traumatólogos de las Américas (ACTUAR). Demographic information was collected, and responses were stratified by income groups: high-income countries (HICs) and middle-income countries (MICs). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 469 orthopaedic surgeons, representing 19 countries in Latin America (2 HICs and 17 MICs). Most respondents were male (89%), completed residency training (96%), and were fellowship-trained (71%). Only 44% of the respondents had received soft-tissue training. Respondents (77%) reported a strong interest in attending a soft-tissue training course. Plastic surgeons were more commonly the primary providers for Gustilo Anderson (GA) Type IIIB injuries in HICs than in MICs (100% vs. 47%, p<0.01) and plastic surgeons were more available (<24 h of patient presentation to the hospital) in HICs than MICs (63% vs. 26%, p = 0.05), demonstrating statistically significant differences. In addition, respondents in HICs performed free flaps more commonly than in MICs for proximal third (55% vs. 10%, p<0.01), middle third (36% vs. 9%, p = 0.02), and distal third (55% vs. 10%, p<0.01) lower extremity wounds. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT or Wound VAC) was the only resource available to more than half of the respondents. Though not statistically significant, surgeons reported having more access to plastic surgeons at their institutions in HICs than MICs (91% vs. 62%, p = 0.12) and performed microsurgical flaps more commonly at their respective institutions (73% vs. 42%, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that most orthopaedic surgeons in Latin America have received no soft-tissue training, HICs and MICs have differences in access to plastic surgeons and expectations for flap type and timing to definitive coverage, and most respondents had limited access to necessary soft-tissue surgical resources. Further investigation into differences in the clinical outcomes related to soft-tissue coverage methods and protocols can provide additional insight into the importance of timing and access to specialists.


Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Fraturas da Tíbia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tíbia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 104(6): 497-503, 2022 03 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35041629

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) detects bacteria-specific DNA corresponding to the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and can identify bacterial presence with greater accuracy than traditional culture methods. The clinical relevance of these findings is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to compare the results from bacterial culture and NGS in order to characterize the potential use of NGS in orthopaedic trauma patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at a single academic, level-I trauma center. Three patient groups were enrolled: (1) patients undergoing surgical treatment of acute closed fractures (presumed to have no bacteria), (2) patients undergoing implant removal at the site of a healed fracture without infection, and (3) patients undergoing a first procedure for the treatment of a fracture nonunion who might or might not have subclinical infection. Surgical site tissue was sent for culture and NGS. The proportions of culture and NGS positivity were compared among the groups. The agreement between culture and NGS results was assessed with use of the Cohen kappa statistic. RESULTS: Bacterial cultures were positive in 9 of 111 surgical sites (110 patients), whereas NGS was positive in 27 of 111 surgical sites (110 patients). Significantly more cases were positive on NGS as compared with culture (24% vs. 8.1%; p = 0.001), primarily in the acute closed fracture group. No difference was found in terms of the percent positivity of NGS when comparing the acute closed fracture, implant removal, and nonunion groups. With respect to bacterial identification, culture and NGS agreed in 73% of cases (κ = 0.051; 95% confidence interval, -0.12 to 0.22) indicating only slight agreement compared with expected chance agreement of 50%. CONCLUSIONS: NGS identified bacterial presence more frequently than culture, but with only slight agreement between culture and NGS. It is possible that the increased frequency of bacterial detection with molecular methods is reflective of biofilm presence on metal or colonization with nonpathogenic bacteria, as culture methods have selection pressure posed by restrictive, artificial growth conditions and there are low metabolic activity and replication rates of bacteria in biofilms. Our data suggest that NGS should not currently substitute for or complement conventional culture in orthopaedic trauma cases with low suspicion of infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas Fechadas , Ortopedia , Bactérias/genética , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Sequência de DNA
5.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 363, 2021 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098974

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Academic trauma institutions rely on fracture databases as research and quality control tools. Frequently, these databases are populated by trainees, but the completeness and accuracy of such databases has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study is to determine the capture rate of a resident-populated database in collecting extremity fractures and to determine the accuracy of assigned Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at a level 1 trauma center of all adult patients who underwent treatment for extremity fractures after an emergency department or inpatient consultation. A 20% random sample was taken from these entries and compared to a resident-populated fracture database designed to capture the same patients. For all matching records containing a resident-assigned OTA classification, relevant imaging was blindly reviewed by a trauma fellowship-trained orthopedic attending surgeon for fracture pattern classification. Resident OTA classifications were compared to this gold standard to determine overall accuracy rate. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen (80%) out of 400 entries were captured by the resident-populated database. Two hundred thirty-one of these 318 entries contained an OTA classification. One hundred fifty-three (66%) of these 231 entries demonstrated concordance between resident and attending assigned OTA classifications. On subgroup analysis, 133 (70%) of the 190 lower extremity classifications were accurately identified as compared to just 20 (49%) of the 41 upper extremity classifications (p = 0.009). Seventy-nine (65%) of the 121 end segment fractures showed agreement versus 42 (67%) of the 63 diaphyseal injury patterns (p = 0.85). Accuracy of classification did not significantly vary by resident year of training (p = 0.142). CONCLUSION: Trainee generated databases at academic institutions may be subject to incomplete data entry and inaccurate fracture classifications. Quality control measures should be instituted to ensure accuracy in such databases if efforts are invested with the expectation of useful information.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Extremidades/lesões , Fraturas Ósseas/classificação , Sistema de Registros , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos , Controle de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33(8): e309-e312, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31045621

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Vibratory and acoustic feedback, drill sharpness, and material density have each been shown to influence the depth of plunging when drilling through bicortical bone. We hypothesized that drilling technique can also influence the depth of plunging. METHODS: Six subjects of various training levels (PGY1 to 16-year experienced surgeon) were asked to drill through a cortical bone surrogate, third-generation Sawbones tube with similar density and compressive modulus of healthy cortical bone. Using a sharp 4.5-mm drill bit and System 6 drill, each participant drilled 30 holes wearing surgical gloves to mimic tactile feedback and using 3 different techniques (10 holes each). The techniques were single-handed smooth, single-handed bounce, and 2-handed smooth drilling. A 60 frame-per-second high-definition video recorder was placed a standard distance from the model and used to calculate the depth of plunging. Analysis of variance with Fisher PLSD post hoc was used to compare techniques (significance P < 0.05). RESULTS: The average ± SD plunge depths were 13.0 ± 4.2 mm (range 6.2-26.8 mm) for single-handed smooth, 17.2 ± 5.0 mm (range 8.0-28.8 mm) for single-handed bounce, and 10.6 ± 3.5 mm (range 5.8-19.2) for 2-handed smooth techniques. Difference among all 3 groups reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Bounce technique had the greatest average depth and variance. The 2-handed technique demonstrated the least plunge and the lowest variance, indicating the highest degree of control. This study supports the use of a 2-handed technique for drilling when intraoperative circumstances permit.


Assuntos
Osso e Ossos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Modelos Anatômicos
7.
J Orthop Trauma ; 32(7): e251-e257, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29916991

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for early reoperation after operative fixation of acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Seven hundred ninety-one patients with displaced acetabular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from 2006 to 2015. Average follow-up was 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early reoperation after acetabular ORIF, defined as secondary procedure for infection or revision within 3 years of initial operation. RESULTS: Fifty-six (7%) patients underwent irrigation and debridement for infection and wound complications. Four associated risk factors identified were length of stay in the intensive care unit, pelvic embolization, operative time, and time delay between injury and surgical fixation. Sixty-two (8%) patients underwent early revision, including 45 conversions to total hip arthroplasty, 10 revision ORIF, 6 fixation device removals because of concern for joint penetration (2 acutely and 4 > 6 months after surgery), and 1 stabilization procedure. Three risk factors associated with early revision were hip dislocation, articular comminution, and concomitant femoral head or neck injury. Combined injuries to the pelvic ring and acetabulum, fracture pattern, marginal impaction, and body mass index had no significant effect on early revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for early reoperation after operative fixation of acetabular fractures differed based on the reason for return to the operating room. Infection was more likely to occur in patients who had prolonged stays in the intensive care unit, had prolonged operative times, were embolized, or experienced delay in time to fixation. Revision was more likely with hip dislocation, articular comminution, femoral head or neck fracture, and advancing age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Acetábulo/lesões , Fratura-Luxação/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Redução Aberta/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Acetábulo/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fratura-Luxação/diagnóstico por imagem , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Redução Aberta/métodos , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Centros de Traumatologia
8.
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg ; 14(3): 143-9, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20818215

RESUMO

Individual fracture patterns demand specific and adequate fixation. Locked volar plating has become popular in the operative fixation of distal radius fractures. However, in cases in which there is a radial styloid fragment or in cases of severe comminution, the amount of fixation from volar plating alone can be inadequate and may lead to loss of reduction. The use of locked radial column plates or Kirschner (K) wires provides additional radial column fixation and allows the surgeon to tailor the amount of fixation to the individual fracture pattern. Outlined here is the technique of combining volar plating with locked radial column plating or K-wire fixation, as well as a step-by-step outline to help achieve fracture reduction.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Placas Ósseas , Parafusos Ósseos , Fios Ortopédicos , Humanos , Rádio (Anatomia)/cirurgia
9.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 17(5): 722-8, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18558498

RESUMO

This biomechanical study compared 2 repair techniques for high-grade, partial, articular-sided supraspinatus tendon tears of the rotator cuff: transtendon in situ repair and tear completion with repair. Standardized, 50% partial, articular-sided supraspinatus lesions were created in 10 pairs of matched fresh, frozen cadaveric shoulders: 10 underwent partial lesion repair with an in situ transtendon technique using 2 suture anchors. In the contralateral 10 shoulders, the partial lesion was converted to a full-thickness tear and repaired with a double-row technique, using 4 suture anchors. Cyclic loading to failure of the supraspinatus tendon was performed using a material testing machine. Gap formation was measured for each rotational position and each incremental load. The in situ transtendon repair had statistically significant less gapping (P = .0001) and higher mean ultimate failure strength (P = .0011) than the double-row repair. In situ transtendon repair was biomechanically superior to tear completion for partial, articular-sided supraspinatus tears.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Traumatismos dos Tendões/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia , Adulto , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Cadáver , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manguito Rotador/fisiopatologia , Técnicas de Sutura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...