Development of an Orthopedic Surgery Anatomy Curricular Model for Fourth Year Medical Students Using a Modified Delphi Method.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop anatomy-focused learning outcomes that can be used to design a fourth-year elective for students matriculating into orthopedic surgery residencies. DESIGN: A series of proposed learning outcomes (N=72) was developed using the ACGME Orthopedic Milestones 2.0 as a framework. In 2021, these were converted into a survey asking participants to rate the importance of each outcome on a 5-point Likert scale. The modified Delphi Method was used to refine the list of outcomes until group consensus was achieved. The consensus was defined using a conservative 3-tier approach. SETTING: Eighteen academic centers with an associated orthopedic surgery residency. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six orthopedic surgeons (ranging from 1 to 42 years in practice). RESULTS: Of the 72 learning outcomes from the first-round survey, 25 met consensus criteria. Of the 62 learning outcomes from the second-round survey, 45 met consensus criteria. All learning outcomes that met consensus criteria after the second-round survey were stratified into low-yield (n = 8), intermediate-yield (n = 34), and high-yield (n = 28) categories. CONCLUSION: Using a modified Delphi Method, this study elicited feedback from experts in the field of orthopedic surgery to develop a framework for a fourth-year elective focused on anatomical concepts important for students applying to residencies in orthopedic surgery. The product of this process affords a great deal of flexibility when utilizing the results of this study in institution-specific curricular development.

An Organizational Approach to Addressing Racism in Orthopaedic Surgery: AOA Critical Issues Symposium.

ABSTRACT: This article highlights the key topics that were presented at a symposium of the American Orthopaedic Association in May 2021, with the primary objectives of acknowledging the existence of systemic racism within the field of orthopaedic surgery, developing a plan for combating racism before it manifests within orthopaedic departments and practices, and understanding the benefit of pipeline programs in diversifying the orthopaedic surgeon workforce. When the word racism is mentioned among a group of orthopaedic surgeons, it may have the immediate effect of stifling honest conversations. Therefore, the crippling effects of racism within orthopaedic surgery are not addressed, and there are downstream effects that influence patient care by perpetuating disparities in health care. If orthopaedic departments want to fix the lack of diversity within the specialty, the magnitude of the problem must first be measured. Fortunately, through the efforts of the J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society, data sets are being created that better measure the diversity of individual orthopaedic residency programs. In addition to hiring diverse faculty, orthopaedic departments and practices should focus on the mentorship, sponsorship, retention, and promotion of these faculty. Finally, pipeline programs such as Nth Dimensions have a proven track record for improving the diversity of the orthopaedic workforce and can serve as the primary mechanism employed by departments and practices in making their orthopaedic surgeon workforce look more like the demographics of the United States.

A track record of diversity: Medical schools ranked by successful black applicants to orthopaedic residencies.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery is the least diverse surgical subspecialty in medicine. However, to date, there is no literature that shows which medical schools have successfully contributed to improving orthopaedic surgeon diversity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify the top U.S. medical schools that have successfully matched black applicants into orthopaedic surgery residencies and juxtapose this ranking to the current top medical schools as ranked by the U.S. News and World Report (USNWR). METHODS: The J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society (JRGOS) database was queried for all orthopaedic surgeons, fellows, and residents who identified as black or multi-racial with black being one of the included races, yielding 938 physicians, of which 672 met our inclusion criteria. From this list, a ranking of the top 20 medical schools was generated. RESULTS: The top five medical schools ranked in the JRGOS database are Howard University College of Medicine (HUCOM), Meharry Medical College, Harvard Medical School (HMS), the University of Pennsylvania, and Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM). In addition, 10 (50%) of the medical schools ranked in the top 20 by the JRGOS database were also ranked by the USNWR. When ranking medical schools for black female applicants, HUCOM, MSM, HMS are the top three programs. Lastly, a ranking by region identified that the northeast contained the highest number of ranked medical schools. CONCLUSION: There are both historically black and non-historically black medical schools which have a proven track record of producing a significant number of future black orthopaedic surgery residents.

Closing the Gender Gap: Barriers to Success for Recruitment and Retention of the Female Orthopaedic Surgery Applicant.

¼ Orthopaedic surgery reports one of the lowest proportions of female residents among all medical specialties. While the number of female medical students has increased, our field has been particularly slow to respond to the gender gap. ¼ There are several barriers to increased female representation in orthopaedics, including "jock" culture and male dominance, the residency application process, pregnancy and lifestyle concerns, a limited number of mentors and role models, and lack of early exposure to the field. ¼ Organizations such as the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), the Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society, The Perry Initiative, Nth Dimensions, and the J. Robert Gladden Society, as well as social media channels, are working to close the gender gap, but there is still more that needs to be done. ¼ By acknowledging and addressing these barriers, both at an individual and institutional level, we can hopefully bring more women into the field. This will ultimately benefit not only ourselves, but our patients as well.

Effect of Opioid Limiting Legislation on Postoperative Opioid Utilization in Patients Treated for Ankle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The state of Ohio implemented legislation in August of 2017 limiting the quantity of opioids a provider could prescribe. The purpose of this study was to identify if implementation of legislation affected opioid and nonopioid utilization in patients operatively treated for ankle fractures in the initial 90-day postoperative period after controlling for injury severity and preoperative narcotic usage. METHODS: A retrospective review of 144 patients treated for isolated ankle fractures in a pre-law group (January 2017-July 2017; n = 73) and post-law group (January 2018-July 2018; n = 71) was completed using electronic medical records and a legal prescriber database. Total number of opioid prescriptions, pills, milligrams of morphine equivalents (MMEs), and nonopioid prescriptions were recorded. Multiple regression analysis was run to identify predictors of opioid prescribing after controlling for law group, demographic, preoperative narcotic use, and injury severity characteristics. RESULTS: Mean MME prescribed per patient significantly decreased from 817.2 MME pre-law to 380.9 post-law (P < .01). Mean number of opioid pills prescribed per patient decreased from 99.1 in the pre-law group and 55.3 in the post law group (P < .001), respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis to predict the mean number of opioid pills prescribed was statistically significant (R 2 = 0.33; P < .001), with law group adding significantly to the prediction (P < .001). The multiple linear regression analysis to predict MME per patient was found to be statistically significant (R 2 = 0.31; P < .001), with the law group contributing significantly (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The Ohio prescriber law successfully contributed to the decreased number of opioid pills and MME prescribed in the initial 90-day postoperative period after controlling for injury severity and preoperative narcotic usage. Policies on opioid prescriptions may serve as an important public health tool in the fight against the opioid epidemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Patterns in Opioid Prescription for Patients Operatively Treated for Ankle Fractures Following Implementation of 2017 Ohio Opioid Prescriber Law.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report patterns of opioid prescription for patients treated operatively for ankle fractures after implementation of the 2017 Ohio Opioid Prescriber Law in comparison to the previous year. METHODS: A total of 144 patients operatively treated for isolated ankle fractures during two 6-month periods, January 2017 to July 2017 (pre-law) and January 2018 to July 2018 (post-law), were retrospectively identified. Preoperative and postoperative patient narcotic use was reviewed using a legal prescriber database. Total number of prescriptions, quantity of pills, and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per patient prescribed during the 90-day postoperative period were compared between those treated before and those treated after implementation of the Ohio prescriber law. RESULTS: The average number of opioid prescriptions prescribed per patient in the 90-day postoperative period was 2.3 in the pre-law group and 2.1 in the post-law group (P = .625). The average MMEs prescribed per patient dropped from 942.4 MME pre-law to 700.5 MME post-law (P = .295). Differences in the average number of pills per prescription pre- and post-law (49.7 vs 36.2) and average MME per prescription (382.1 mg vs 275.2 mg) were statistically significant (P < .001 and P = .016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Following the implementation of the 2017 Ohio Opioid Prescriber Law, there was a downward trend in the number of pills per prescription and MMEs per prescription in patients operatively treated for isolated ankle fractures. The presence of a downward trend in the quantity of opioids prescribed in this patient cohort suggests the effectiveness of the state law. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study.

Peroneal Tendon Tears: We Should Consider Looking at the Muscle Instead.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether tears of the peroneus brevis (PB) tendon correlate with increased fatty infiltration of the PB muscle on MRI compared with musculature without clinical evidence of peroneal pathology. METHODS: Ankle MRI scans of patients with PB tendon tearing (tear group) were compared with those of patients without clinical evidence of peroneal pathology (control group). Two reviewers graded the PB muscle belly according to the Goutallier classification. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in each group. The mean Goutallier scores for the tear and control groups were 0.52 (±0.72) and 0.05 (±0.15), respectively (P = 0.0019). The level of interobserver agreement between reviewers was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.85). DISCUSSION: Patients with PB tendon tear demonstrate markedly higher grades of fatty degeneration compared with patients without peroneal pathology. The Goutallier classification may become a valuable instrument for assessing the severity of a PB tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.

Venous Thromboembolism Disease Prophylaxis in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

There are limited data to guide the use of venous thromboembolism disease (VTED) prophylaxis after foot and ankle surgery. Although there is general consensus that the overall risk is lower than after hip or knee replacement, subpopulations of patients may be at relatively heightened risk. Furthermore, existing data are often conflicting regarding the efficacy of prophylaxis, with little acknowledgment of the tradeoffs between VTED prophylaxis and potential complications associated with the use of such medications. This article provides an overview of currently available evidence to guide decision making regarding VTED prophylaxis in patients who undergo foot and ankle surgery.

Preventing influenza: vaccine systems and practices in the Southeast.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine from state and local health departments: (1) how they purchase, distribute, and fund influenza vaccine; (2) whether they experienced a shortage in 2003/04; (3) how the shortages were handled; and (4) how they prepared for distribution in 2004/05. METHODS: A web-based survey was completed from June to August 2004 in eight Southeastern states. RESULTS: Data were obtained from each state and 222 local health departments. Major differences between and within states were found with regard to purchasing, distributing, and funding influenza vaccine. Although the majority of health departments experienced periods of shortages in 2003/2004, surpluses of vaccine remained at the end of the season. There was little evidence of interaction between the public and private sectors to share vaccine resources in response to shortages. Tracking systems for redistribution of vaccine or follow-up were often not in place. Entering the 2004/05 season, 25% of states and 11% of counties were not developing any special procedures to deal with shortages beyond what was in place earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Better systems and funding are needed, especially for adult influenza vaccine delivery and for redistribution of influenza vaccine in response to shortages.