Prognostic factors in two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction: Is it possible to predict surgical failure?

INTRODUCTION: Two-stage surgical reconstruction of the flexor tendons by the Hunter technique is the salvage option in case of old tears or a severely damaged fibro-osseous canal. HYPOTHESIS: The identification of poor prognostic factors during the assessment of injuries at presentation could help determine indications and predict failures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a retrospective single center series of reconstruction of zone 2 of the flexor digitorum profundus of the long fingers between 2000 and 2012, in 22 patients, mean age 33 years old with a mean follow-up of 36.4 months. RESULTS: The total active range of motion (TAM) of the rays was 110° with a mean range of motion of the PIP and DIP of 71° and 39° respectively. Sixty-three percent of patients were satisfied and 73% returned to their professional activities. A group with good and fair results was determined based on the Strickland classification (68%, 15 patients, mean TAM 126°, mean QuickDASH 22.6) and a group with poor results (32%, 7 patients, mean TAM 77°, mean QuickDASH 43.4). The factors of a poor prognosis were associated injuries to the extensor apparatus, infection (phlegmon) (P=0.023) and joint injuries (P=0.09). DISCUSSION: There are no factors in the literature to predict a poor prognosis except for reconstruction of the flexor pollicis longus. A simplified procedure could provide better results in patients with associated injuries to the extensor apparatus, infection (phlegmon) or osteoarticular damage, in terms of the duration of physical therapy, additional surgery and overall socioeconomic cost. The results in the literature of superficialis finger reconstruction are significantly better (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the Hunter technique is still the reference procedure for the reconstruction of flexor tendons, our study identified prognostic factors of poor functional results such as infection and associated extensor apparatus damage, which should orient the surgeon towards a simplified technique such as the superficialis finger procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV: retrospective study.

Revision surgery for recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical results and factors affecting outcomes.

Thirty-eight hands in 36 patients with recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were reviewed retrospectively after a mean of 51 months (range 12-86) to identify factors that may lead to poor outcomes after surgical management. Clinical assessment focused on pain and sensitivity recovery, measured with a VAS and Weber's two-point discrimination test, respectively. At the latest follow-up, we found 11 excellent, 15 good, nine fair and three poor results. The risk of fair or poor results was significantly higher in the presence of intraneural fibrosis, severe preoperative sensory deficit, neuroma of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve, workers compensation claims and number of previous surgeries. This last factor also significantly increased the risk of intraneural fibrosis. Despite disappointing outcomes, identification of these factors may improve our prognostic ability for revision surgery in cases of recurrent CTS.

Impact of cardiovascular risk factor on the prevalence and severity of symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

INTRODUCTION: The natural history of rotator cuff (RC) tears is likely multifactorial. Two theories have been put forward to explain them: extrinsic and intrinsic. Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors may be important in the context of the intrinsic theory. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the influence of CV risk factors and their cumulative effect on the prevalence of symptomatic full-thickness RC tears and on the severity of these lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational case-control study was carried out with 206 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The control population consisted of 100 consecutive patients of the same age who had asymptomatic unoperated shoulders and were being operated in the orthopedics unit. The full-thickness RC tears were classified intraoperatively using the Southern California Orthopaedic Institute (SCOI) classification described by Snyder. CV risk factors were rated as either present or absent: smoking, high blood pressure (HBP), diabetes, alcoholism, dyslipidemia, obesity and CV history. RESULTS: Using a multivariate analysis, two factors were identified as having a significant influence on the prevalence of RC tears: smoking (OR=8.715, 95%CI=4.192-18.118, P<0.0001) and dyslipidemia (OR=4.920, 95%CI=2.046-11.834, P=0.0004). The following factors had a significant effect on the severity of RC tears: smoking (OR=1.98, P=0.0341, 95%CI=1.05-3.74), HBP (OR=3.215, P=0.0005, 95%CI=1.67-6.19) and history of CV disease (OR=6.17, P<0.0001, 95%CI=2.5-14.78). The case patients had an average of 2.09 CV risk factors while the control patients had an average of 0.74 (OR=3.56, 95%CI=2.18-6.33, P=0.0012). The average number of CV risk factors increased as the severity of the tear increased: 0.19 for stage 1, 1.75 for stage 2, 2.75 for stage 3 and 2.90 for stage 4. DISCUSSION: Modification of the vascular background appears to influence the severity and prevalence of tears. This corroborates anatomical studies in which a hypovascular area was identified in the tendon, 10-15 mm from the lesser trochanter attachment. Smoking, high blood pressure and obesity have been identified in other published studies as risks factors for the severity and prevalence of RC tears. However, it will be important to dissociate prevalence issues from that of RC healing in patients with compromised vascularity. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular risk factors have a significant role in the pathology of RC tears. The prevalence of RC tears is greater in patients who smoke or have dyslipidemia. Their severity is greater in patients who smoke, have high blood pressure or have experienced at least one CV event. The next step will be to study how these factors affect tendon healing, as this information could change our indications for cuff repair.

Total elbow arthroplasty: Influence of implant positioning on functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Restoring the axis of rotation is often considered crucial to achieving good functional outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty. The objective of this work was to evaluate whether variations in implant positioning correlated with clinical outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: Clinical outcomes are dictated by the quality of implant positioning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of data from 25 patients (26 elbows). Function was assessed using a pain score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Score, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The patients also underwent a clinical evaluation for measurements of motion range and flexion/extension strength. Position of the humeral and ulnar implants was assessed by computed tomography with reconstruction using OsiriX software. Indices reflecting anterior offset, lateral offset, valgus, height, and rotation were computed by subtracting the ulnar value of each of these variables from the corresponding humeral value. These indices provided a quantitative assessment of whether position errors for the two components had additive effects or, on the contrary, counterbalanced each other. Elbows with prosthetic loosening or extensive epiphyseal destruction were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 26 elbows, 5 were excluded. In the remaining 21 elbows, the discrepancy between the humeral and ulnar lateral offsets was significantly associated with pain intensity (P ≤ 0.05) and the MEPS (P ≤ 0.05). Anterior position of the ulna relative to the humerus was associated with decreased extension strength (P ≤ 0.05) and worse results for all functional parameters (P ≤ 0.05). DISCUSSION: In the absence of loosening, positioning errors seem to adversely affect functional outcomes, probably by placing inappropriate stress on the soft tissues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.