Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and blood transfusion safety.

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) are untreatable, fatal neurologic diseases affecting mammals. Human disease forms include sporadic, familial and acquired Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). While sporadic CJD (sCJD) has been recognized for near on 100 years, variant CJD (vCJD) was first reported in 1996 and is the result of food-borne transmission of the prion of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, 'mad cow disease'). Currently, 230 vCJD cases have been reported in 12 countries, the majority in the UK (178) and France (27). Animal studies demonstrated highly efficient transmission of natural scrapie and experimental BSE by blood transfusion and fuelled concern that sCJD was potentially transfusion transmissible. No such case has been recorded and case-control evaluations and lookback studies indicate that, if transfusion transmission occurs at all, it is very rare. In contrast, four cases of apparent transfusion transmission of vCJD infectivity have been identified in the UK. Risk minimization strategies in response to the threat of vCJD include leucodepletion, geographically based donor deferrals and deferral of transfusion recipients. A sensitive and specific, high-throughput screening test would provide a potential path to mitigation but despite substantial effort no such test has yet appeared. The initial outbreak of vCJD appears to be over, but concern remains about subsequent waves of disease among those already infected. There is considerable uncertainty about the size of the infected population, and there will be at least a perception of some continuing risk to blood safety. Accordingly, at least some precautionary measures will remain in place and continued surveillance is necessary.

Effectiveness of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) recipient tracing (lookback) and the current HTLV-I and -II confirmatory algorithm, 1999 to 2004.

BACKGROUND: This study reports on the efficacy of an investigational human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I and -II lookback program in the context of differing confirmatory testing algorithms. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The results of testing approximately 35 million donations for anti-HTLV-I and -II were evaluated for two recent periods reflecting the use of two different confirmatory algorithms. The number of seroconverting donors was established for the entire period, and the results of lookback on their prior donations were investigated. RESULTS: The dual enzyme immunoassay (EIA) strategy was used throughout both study periods and resulted in a 57 to 76 percent reduction in the number of samples requiring confirmatory testing. From May 2000 to February 2002, a total of 9138 samples were repeatedly reactive by the primary screening test; of the concordant EIA-reactive samples, 461 (12%) were confirmed by Western blot, whereas 3083 (79%) were indeterminate. From March 2002 to December 2004, a total of 21,291 samples were repeatedly reactive; of the concordant EIA-reactive samples, 1099 (22%) were confirmed by the State of California's reference laboratory and only 273 (5%) were equivocal. Overall, 38 or 1 in 921,000 donations were from a seroconverting donor with 32 prior donations within the lookback period. Of those 32, components from only 11 were transfused to recipients who survived; of these, 4 were tested and all were nonreactive for HTLV-I and -II antibodies. CONCLUSION: Use of creative algorithms can increase the efficacy of anti-HTLV-I and -II confirmatory testing and reduce the number of indeterminate results. Currently, lookback for HTLV-I and -II has a very low yield, and its public health benefit is questionable.

Self-reported symptoms associated with West Nile virus infection in RNA-positive blood donors.

BACKGROUND: In 2003, West Nile virus (WNV) nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) was implemented to detect potentially infected donors. Of more than 5.3 million donations screened prospectively by the American Red Cross during the epidemic periods of 2003 and 2004, 974 were NAT-reactive and 519 confirmed-positive. A subset of both the confirmed-positive and the false-positive groups was assessed for demographic characteristics, symptoms, and symptom reporting relative to date of donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All donors with initial WNV NAT-reactive results were invited to participate in a study that included a demographic, symptom, and date-of-symptom questionnaire. WNV confirmed-positive cases were compared to false-positive controls for comparison of frequency of symptom reporting before, on the day of, and after donation. RESULTS: Enrolled cases and controls were similar in all characteristics except cases were more likely to live in rural areas. Symptoms were reported by 61 percent of cases versus 20 percent of controls, with 74 percent of symptoms reported by cases within the 14 days after donation. The frequency of headache and fever reported together in the 7 days before donation was not significantly different between cases and controls; only the individual frequencies of headache, eye pain, and new rash during this time were significantly different. The most commonly reported symptoms, after adjustment for symptom reporting by controls, were headache, new rash, and generalized weakness; these symptoms were reported by 25 percent of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The demographic characteristics of infected donors reflected the rural nature of the 2003 to 2004 WNV epidemics. This study suggests that asking donors about predonation headache and fever had no detectable contribution to blood safety.

Current estimates of transfusion safety worldwide.

Blood safety is a global public health priority. However, the degree to which blood is, or is not free of infection risk varies greatly around the world. The major determinants of this variation in risk are the availability of resources to support blood safety measures such as testing and the qualitative and quantitative epidemiological patterns of blood-borne infections. These factors are outlined and examples are presented.

Current impact of the confidential unit exclusion option.

BACKGROUND: In 1986, the FDA recommended using a confidential unit exclusion (CUE) option in blood centers; this was rescinded in 1992. The American Red Cross (ARC) has continued using the option. This study assessed its current impact. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donor records from ARC for 1995 through 2001 were examined for CUE use in association with the prevalence and frequency of seroconversion of infectious disease markers. The likely yield of CUE was also estimated. RESULTS: Donations with CUE use had a higher prevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis markers than those without CUE use, although both the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of CUE were low. Seroconverters had a higher frequency of using the CUE option than nonseroconverters. Similarly, the sensitivity and PPV of CUE were low. Based on analysis of infectious disease residual risk, the CUE option was estimated to have prevented the collection of 0.2 to 1.3 window-period units annually within the entire ARC system. CONCLUSION: The CUE option had minimal effectiveness in further reducing the transmission of infectious diseases through window-period units. Further study of its current impact on reduction of units from risky but test-negative donors, as well as on loss of safe donors, may be warranted.

Risk factors for HCV infection among blood donors confirmed to be positive for the presence of HCV RNA and not reactive for the presence of anti-HCV.

BACKGROUND: In 1999, NAT of blood donations was implemented to detect "window-period" infections. Blood donors who have confirmed NAT results positive for the presence of HCV in the absence of anti-HCV are likely to have been recently infected. Of over 26.8 million donations tested between March 3, 1999, and March 31, 2003, 810 were HCV-reactive by NAT. A subset of these donors was assessed for recent exposure risk. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All anti-HCV- blood donors with reactive, unconfirmed HCV NAT results were invited to participate in a study that included an extensive demographic and risk questionnaire. Confirmed HCV+ cases were compared to HCV- (falsely positive) controls for histories of potential risk factors during the 6 months before donation. RESULTS: Recent injection drug use (IDU) was independently associated with HCV infection (29.2% vs. 0% of cases vs. controls, p < 0.001). In addition, likely sources were identified for three other cases (4.6%), including occupational exposure, sexual contact with an HCV-infected partner (who was an IDU), and perinatal exposure, none of which was known to the donors at the time of donation. Incarceration was independently associated with HCV infection among the group not reporting IDU and after removal of the three donors with likely sources of risk (14.6% vs. 1.3% of cases vs. controls, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A likely risk, primarily IDU, was found for 43 percent of HCV+ donors whose infections were identified solely by NAT. Because the maximum efficiency of the donor history questions may have been reached, NAT will continue to be an important measure to interdict recently infected blood donors.

Current prevalence and incidence of infectious disease markers and estimated window-period risk in the American Red Cross blood donor population.

BACKGROUND: There has been continuing progress in measures to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted infection, including introduction of serologic tests of increased sensitivity and the recent implementation of investigational NAT in small pools of samples. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data relating to all blood donations to the American Red Cross have been consolidated into a single database. The prevalence of confirmed-positive test results for HBsAg, HCV, HIV, and HTLV were evaluated for each year for first-time donors from 1995 through 2001. Incidence rates for these infections were evaluated among repeat donors having at least two donations in a 2-year period. The frequencies of HIV-1 RNA- and HCV RNA-positive, seronegative donations were assessed for first-time and repeat donations. The relationship risk = (window period) x (incidence) was used to assess residual risk among repeat donations and to evaluate the incidence of HCV and HIV infection among first-time donors. RESULTS: During the study period, prevalence rates for all markers declined significantly over time: in 2001, the rates per 100,000 were 75.6 for HBsAg, 299 for HCV, 9.7 for HIV, and 9.6 for HTLV; the corresponding incidence rates (/100,000 person-years) were 1.267, 1.889, 1.554, and 0.239, respectively. Estimates of residual risk in donations from repeat donors (after NAT) for HCV and HIV were 1 per 1,935,000 and 1 per 2,135,000, respectively. However, incidence rates for these agents are approximately two times greater among first-time donors. For both HCV and HIV, NAT yield was concordant with that predicted by current window-period models. CONCLUSION: These data cover about half of all the whole blood collected in the United States. They suggest increasing improvement in transfusion safety and clearly define the benefit of pooled NAT.

Reducing the risk of blood transfusion.

There are continuing concerns over the safety of the nation's and the world's blood supply. The allogeneic blood supply is tested for antibodies to HIV1/2, HTLVI/II, hepatitis B, hepatitis C (HCV) and syphilis. Testing is also performed for donor ALT (SGOT) levels, for the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) p24 antigen and, using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT), for HIV and HCV nucleic acids. Still, there are concerns regarding other pathogenic agents. Dr. Roger Dodd addresses a series of pathogens that are already known to be transmissible by transfusion. These include malaria, Chagas' disease, babesiosis, bacteria and some viral agents. The need for new donor screening assays to protect the integrity and purity of the blood supply must be balanced against the loss of potential donors and the cost of developing and implementing these new screening assays. This issue will be highlighted. Dr. Edward Snyder reviews the status of research into development of systems for pathogen inactivation (PI) of blood and its components. A proactive technology wherein PI reagents such as psoralen, riboflavin, dimethylmethylene blue or inactine are added to blood collection bags could assure multiple log reduction of a variety of pathogens including viruses, bacteria, protozoa and fungi without the need to initially pre-screen the blood for a specific pathogen. Such a program could also cover new pathogens as they enter the blood supply. As a key issue relates to the toxicology of these agents, Dr. Snyder provides data on a novel carcinogenicity assay that uses a heterozygous p53 knock-out mouse model. The criteria likely to be needed for PI technology to be adopted by the transfusion community are summarized.

Absence of risk factors for false-positive test results in blood donors with a reactive test result in an automated treponemal test (PK-TP) for syphilis.

BACKGROUND: Screening and confirmatory serologic tests for syphilis are known to generate false-positive results in low-risk populations, which include blood donors. This study assessed whether conditions previously reported to cause biological false-positive (BFP) test results for syphilis are relevant to contemporary syphilis testing of blood donors and the extent to which seropositive donors report a history of syphilis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A history of conditions reported to be associated with BFP syphilis tests or a history of syphilis infection was assessed by a case-control study of donors with reactive and nonreactive automated treponemal test results, using an anonymous mail survey. Analysis of cases was stratified by fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) result. RESULTS: Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for reported BFP-associated conditions were 1.3 (0.8-2.1) for FTA-ABS-positive cases and 0.8 (0.3-1.9) for FTA-ABS-negative cases. Among responding blood donors, syphilis history was reported in 78 (51%) of 153 FTA-ABS-positive cases, 0 of 142 FTA-ABS-negative cases, and 3 (0.4%) of 716 automated treponemal test (PK-TP)-negative controls. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of donors with FTA-ABS-positive test results reported a syphilis history. There was no difference between reported BFP conditions for FTA-ABS-positive or FTA-ABS-negative cases and controls. This information may be useful when providing donors with better predonation or post-test counseling information about syphilis testing.

Seroprevalence of known and putative hepatitis markers in United States blood donors with ALT levels at least 120 IU per L.

BACKGROUND: ALT testing of blood donors was initiated as a surrogate marker for non-A, non-B hepatitis. Increased sensitivity of subsequent HBV and HCV tests used for standard donor screening make any residual value of ALT testing questionable. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 166 of 645 eligible blood donors from three American Red Cross regions whose ALT was > or =120 IU per L and whose standard donor screening tests were negative. Of these enrolled donors, 124 (75%) completed follow-up. Samples obtained from the index donation, at enrollment (1 month), and at follow-up (6 months) underwent the standard donor screening tests, as well as those for HCV RNA and HGV RNA (RT-PCR), antibodies to the virus envelope E2 protein of GB virus type C (GBV-C E2 antibody), and IgM antibody for CMV, parvovirus B19, EBV VCA, and HAV. Participants completed a brief demographic and exposure history questionnaire at follow-up. RESULTS: All study samples were negative in standard donor-screening tests. ALT levels were variable at return visits, with 80 to 86 percent <120 IU per L. No participants were positive for HCV RNA; 4 percent were positive for HGV RNA, and 10 percent were positive for GBV-C E2 antibody. Results of CMV, parvovirus B19, EBV VCA, and HAV testing were similar to published background rates. No demographic or exposure history variables had significant correlation with ALT or other testing results. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an ALT > or =120 IU per L in blood donors with negative standard screening tests has questionable value as a surrogate marker for seronegative HBV or HCV infection. Continued ALT testing may contribute little, if anything, to the safety of blood components or plasma for further manufacture.

Current viral risks of blood and blood products.

A number of viruses may be transmitted by blood transfusion, the most important of these are HIV, human T-cell lymphotrophic retrovirus (HTLV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). A series of overlapping safety measures are in place and are being improved and supplemented continuously. As a result, the risk of transmission of these viruses in the USA has been reduced to between one and four per million blood components transfused.

Transmission of parasites and bacteria by blood components.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although most attention has been paid to viral infections as a complication of transfusion, some parasitic infections are readily transmissible and generate a heavy burden of disease, particularly in the developing world. Additionally, bacterial infection as a result of transfusion is the most frequent serious outcome of transfusion in the developed world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of current literature and ongoing research studies. RESULTS: Malaria and Chagas' disease continue to be a serious problem in endemic areas, but are also of concern as a result of their introduction into other regions. Means to control or detect bacterial contamination, particularly of platelet concentrates, are needed, but no simple, effective approach is available. CONCLUSION: Continued development and implementation of tests and of inactivation procedures will result in the eventual control of transfusion-transmitted parasitic and bacterial disease.