Defining the Current Landscape of Women in Urology: An Analysis of Female Applicants, Residents, and Faculty at AUA-Accredited Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current landscape of women in academic Urology and determine if there is a correlation between female applicant matches and the proportion of female faculty/residents at their home institution or matched program. METHODS: We obtained 2020 American Urological Association (AUA) Match applicant demographics through social media platforms and program inquiries. The gender of full-time faculty and residents at AUA accredited programs was obtained from program websites. Correlations between proportions of female matched applicants and female faculty and residents were analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: A total of 353 residency slots at all 142 non-military programs were filled in the 2020 AUA Match, with 105 filled by women (30%). Of all applicants, 221 of 286 (77%) males and 105 of 122 (86%) females matched. Regarding institutions with urology residencies, women made up 27% of residents and 16% of full-time faculty. A total of 23 (17%) did not have any female faculty and 8 (6%) had no female residents. We found a positive correlation between the proportion of female residents and female faculty (r2 = 0.12, P <.0001). There was no significant correlation between the proportion of female matched applicants and female faculty or female residents at their matched programs or home institutions. CONCLUSION: The proportion of female residents within a urology program is positively correlated with the number of female faculty in the department, although further studies are needed to examine contributing factors. The current distribution of female applicants may demonstrate further narrowing of the gender gap within residency programs.

Techniques for optimizing lead placement during sacral neuromodulation.

We present a video describing technical considerations for optimizing lead placement for sacral neuromodulation. A 56-year-old female presented with urinary urgency incontinence refractory to behavioral modification, physical therapy, and oral pharmacotherapy. An Interstim device had been placed 3 years prior by another provider, but the patient did not find it beneficial and had uncomfortable stimulation despite reprogramming. After counseling, she opted for device revision. The S3 foramen is identified using fluoroscopy in anterior-posterior and lateral views; a needle is advanced through the cephalad and medial aspect of the foramen and tested for bellows and toe responses. After the directional guide is placed, the introducer is advanced until it is midway through the bony table. The lead, with a curved stylet, is advanced for repeat testing prior to deployment. It should have a cephalad-to-caudad appearance and curve laterally. Motor responses are tested and optimally should be < 2 V with all electrodes. The lead is then advanced fully, deployed, and retested. The patient's daytime frequency improved to 6 per day from 11 per day at baseline; her urgency incontinence and the uncomfortable stimulation resolved. Optimization of lead placement for sacral neuromodulation is crucial for improving clinical results.