RESUMO
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can be damaged during the aseptic compounding process, with aggregation being the most prevalent form of degradation. Protein aggregates represent one of several risk factors for undesired immunogenicity of mAbs, which can potentially lead to severe adverse drug reactions and less effective treatments. Since data on aggregate and particle formation by robotic compounding is missing, we aimed to compare the antibody stability between robotic- and manual compounding of mAbs with regard to formation of (sub)visible aggregates. Infliximab and trastuzumab were compounded into infusion bags with the APOTECAchemo robot or manually by nurses or pharmacy technicians. The products were analyzed by quantifying (sub)visible particles with nanoparticle tracking analysis, dynamic light scattering (DLS), light obscuration, micro-flow imaging, high pressure size exclusion chromatography (HP-SEC), and visual inspection. HP-SEC showed high percentages monomers in trastuzumab (99.4 % and 99.4 %) and infliximab (99.5 % and 99.6 %) infusion bags for both manual and robotic compounding, respectively. DLS indicated more consistent and reproducible results with robotic compounding, and confirmed monodisperse samples with a higher polydispersity index for manual compounding (0.16, interquartile range; IQR 0.14-0.18) compared to robotic compounding (0.12, IQR 0.11-0.15). This study shows that the studied compounding methods had a minor impact on the number of aggregates and particles, and that robotic compounding of mAbs provided at least similar quality as manual compounding.
