Editor's Choice - Sex Differences in Response to Administration of Heparin During Non-Cardiac Arterial Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Females are more prone to complications during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAPs) than males. The current study investigated the difference in the effect of peri-procedural prophylactic heparin in males and females, using the activated clotting time (ACT). This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective NCAP using heparin and ACT measurements between January 2016 and March 2020 were included. Two heparin dosage protocols were used: weight based dosing of 100 IU/kg (international units per kilogram) or a bolus of 5 000 IU. The primary outcome was the anticoagulatory effect of heparin after five minutes, measured by ACT. Secondary outcomes were the effect of heparin after 30 minutes, bleeding complications, and arterial thromboembolic complications (ATECs). RESULTS: A total of 778 patients were included; 26% were female. After 100 IU/kg (n = 300), females more often reached longer ACT (< 200 seconds: 22% vs. 25%, p = .62; 200 - 250 seconds: 41% vs. 53%, p = .058; 251 - 280 seconds, 26% vs. 15%, p = .030). The mean ACT after 100 IU/kg heparin was 233 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI] 224 - 243) for females and 226 seconds (95% CI 221 - 231) for males (p = .057). After a bolus of 5 000 IU of heparin (n = 411), females reached significantly higher levels of anticoagulation than males (mean ACT 204 seconds vs. 190 seconds: p ≤ .001; ACT < 200 seconds: 44% vs. 66%; p < .001; ACT 200 - 250 seconds: 47% vs. 30%, p = .001; ACT 251 - 280 seconds: 7.8% vs. 2.3%, p = .009). Thirty minutes after heparin administration, 58% of all patients had an ACT < 200 seconds. ATECs did not differ between females and males (6.9% vs. 5.1%, p = .33) but bleeding complications were higher in females (27% vs. 16%, p = .001). CONCLUSION: Heparin leads to significantly longer ACT in females during NCAP. Further research is needed to investigate whether individually based heparin protocols lead to fewer bleeding complications and lower incidence of ATECs.

Weight Based Heparin Dosage with Activated Clotting Time Monitoring Leads to Adequate and Safe Anticoagulation in Non-Cardiac Arterial Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin has an unpredictable effect in an individual patient. The activated clotting time (ACT) can be used to measure the effect of heparin in the individual patient and guide additional heparin dosages. Previous cohort studies showed that a standardized bolus of 5,000 IU during noncardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) does not lead to an adequate ACT in the vast majority of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an initial heparin dose of 100 IU/kg leads to an adequate but safe ACT, from 200 to 300 s. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective study, 186 patients undergoing NCAP were enrolled and received an initial heparin dose of 100 IU/kg. Target ACT was set at ≥250 s initially; during the course of the study the target ACT was lowered to ≥200 s. After the initial heparin dose, additional heparin dosages were administered depending on the ACT values following a heparin dose protocol. ACT measurements and complications were monitored. RESULTS: The mean baseline ACT was 134 ± 17 s. The mean ACT 5 minutes after the initial heparin dose was 227 ± 37 s. After the initial dose of heparin, 78 and 46% of patients reached an ACT of 200 and 250 s, respectively. Seven patients (4%) reached an ACT of 300 s or more. Ninety-four patients (51%) received at least one additional dose of heparin. After one additional dose of heparin, 91% of patients reached an ACT of 200 s and 13 patients (7%) reached an ACT of 300 s or more. Arterial thromboembolic complications occurred in 4.3% and bleeding complications occurred in 9.7%. CONCLUSIONS: A bolus of 100 IU/kg of heparin during NCAP results in adequate coagulation in most patients. ACT measurements enable accurate additional dosing, ensuring the individual patient tailored and safe coagulation. KEY WORDS: anticoagulants; heparin; blood coagulation tests; vascular surgical procedures; peripheral vascular disease.

More Effective Anticoagulation During Non-Cardiac Arterial Procedures Using Activated Clotting Time Guided Heparin Administration.

OBJECTIVES: Arterial thrombo-embolic complications (ATEC) are still common during and after non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) despite the administration of (a fixed bolus of) heparin. These ATEC could be due to existing individual differences in heparin sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of an ACT guided heparin dose protocol and to evaluate if a more effective target ACT can be achieved during NCAP. METHODS: In this multi-center prospective study, 194 patients undergoing elective and non-elective NCAP were enrolled and received heparin according to a heparin dose protocol which aimed to obtain a target ACT of 250 seconds (s.), measured by the Medtronic HMS Plus. Patients received a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU followed by additional boluses depending on the actual ACT. Primary outcome was the ACT value reached. Secondary outcomes were incidence of all ATEC and haemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: The mean baseline ACT was 138 ± 17 s. The mean ACT five minutes after the initial heparin bolus of 5 000 IU was 197 ± 31 s. 48% of patients reached an ACT of 200 s. and six per cent of patients reached an ACT of 250 s. Additional dosages of heparin were administered in 72% of patients. With this ACT guided heparin protocol 86% of patients reached an ACT of 200 s. and 26% of patients reached an ACT of 250 s. A negative correlation was found between body weight and the ACT at T1 (P ˂ 0.001). ATEC and haemorrhagic complications occurred in 11.3% and 16.5% of patients. The lowest incidence of ATEC was found in patients with peak ACT between 200 and 250 s, namely 6.3%. CONCLUSION: This ACT guided heparin protocol proved to be feasible, safe and more patients reached an ACT > of 200 s. compared to a standardized heparin bolus of 5 000 IU. Further research is needed to investigate if ACT guided heparin administration could be preferable over not monitoring the anticoagulant effect of peri-procedural heparin and results in a lower incidence of ATEC, without an increase in haemorrhagic complications.

A Standardized Bolus of 5 000 IU of Heparin Does not Lead to Adequate Heparinization during Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures.

BACKGROUND: In non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP), heparin is administered to prevent arterial thromboembolic complications (ATEC). Heparin has a nonpredictable effect in the individual patient, also known as variation in heparin sensitivity. Various dosing protocols are in use, but the optimal dose is currently still unknown. A standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin is most frequently used by vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. The activated clotting time (ACT) is an established method to measure the level of anticoagulation, but has, until now, not gained widespread use in NCAP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anticoagulant effect during NCAP of a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin by measuring the ACT. METHODS: In this prospective study, 190 patients undergoing NCAP were enrolled between December 2016 and September 2018. The ACT was measured during open and endovascular/hybrid procedures. All patients received a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin. The ACT was measured by the Hemostasis Management System Plus (HMS Plus, Medtronic®), before, 5 minutes after administration of heparin, and every 30 minutes thereafter. The primary outcome was periprocedural ACT values measured. Secondary outcomes were ATEC and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: A large individual patient variability in the response to heparin was found. The mean baseline ACT in all patients was 129 ± 18 s., and the mean ACT 5 minutes after the initial bolus of heparin was 191 ± 36 s. After the initial dose of 5 000 IU heparin 60 (33%) and 10 (6%) patients reached an ACT of 200 and 250 s., respectively. Despite the use of heparin, ATEC occurred in 17 patients (9%). The lowest number of ATEC occurred in the group of patients with an ACT between 200 and 250 s. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin does not lead to adequate and safe heparinization in non-cardiac arterial procedures. Patient response to heparin shows a large individual variability. Therefore, routine ACT measurements are necessary to ascertain adequate anticoagulation. Further research is needed to investigate if heparin dosing based on the ACT could result in less arterial thromboembolic complications, without increasing hemorrhagic complications.

No Concluding Evidence on Optimal Activated Clotting Time for Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Heparin has a non-predictable effect in the individual patient. The activated clotting time (ACT) is used to measure the level of anticoagulation after administration of heparin. To date, appropriate heparin dose protocols and corresponding therapeutic ACT values have not been established in non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). The aim of this review was to study the use of ACT monitoring during NCAP, and whether an optimal ACT could be determined based on the fewest arterial thrombo-embolic complications (ATEC) and bleeding complications. METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database. Any associations were evaluated between peri-procedural ACT levels and ATEC and bleeding complications detected during the same admission as the primary procedure or during 30 day follow up. Also, heparin dose protocols, peri-procedural target ACTs, different ACT devices, protamine use and pre-, peri-, and post-procedural anticoagulation therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 21 studies with 3982 patients were included, on both open and endovascular NCAP. Four studies were primarily designed to correlate peak peri-procedural ACT with clinical outcomes; however, the definitions of the results and the clinical outcomes were too heterogeneous for analysis. There was major variability in all studied aspects of ACT measurement, heparin and protamine use, and in the type of procedures in the included studies. Overall methodological quality of the included studies was poor. No randomised controlled trials were found. Studies were at a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates a lack of data and no consensus in the literature concerning the optimal ACT, and the possible association with haemorrhagic complications and ATEC during NCAP.